Huw Edwards accused by multiple teens of inappropriate behaviour

[thesheriff443]

Well the Mum has tried to get them to answer who know she might have involved the whiter than white not Met as well and when she hit a brick wall took it to the Sun like any parent would if the employee is on Tv after she reported him

The police have to investigate allegations so I don’t believe the family went to the police first

[Cherie]

The police have to investigate allegations so I don’t believe the family went to the police first

it doesnt matter who they went to, its their call, I wouldnt trust the police either to do anything tbh not after recent events ....and historically like Saville and Rochdale where it was all swept aside by powerful people, not sure why you and Liam are victim blaming the mother in all this, she had done what she thought was right who is anyone to question that, we are not in her shoes and dont know her previous history with the police or otherwise

[user104658]

... ... ... ... ... ... I think the truth of the matter is likely that the 17 year old involved was probably already a drug addict unrelated to this, and was providing the pictures to fund their drug habit.

And with that in mind - to be frank - no I wouldn't be surprised if the parents of an already-drug-addicted 17 year old aren't telling the whole story and have ulterior motives.

In terms of whichever presenter is involved all of that is largely irrelevant - funding a child's drug habit by buying underage pornography of them is both illegal and morally abhorrent. Really just bottom-of-the-barrel low.

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-8ff841d3-d034-430f-a698-a42e4dd6b3c9.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-28cd793c-5ac5-4829-85d0-098b3fecfa6d.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-0ed891fc-c9fd-45e4-b12a-bcf74f9f9880.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-a3e01ac4-6a72-449e-b77d-bc1d7503fb0c.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-9cd4cf82-8048-4609-b75d-5bc067f30b78.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-aba37f2b-b009-4687-848c-1eaca1e28cc8.jpeg

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-be2ca7bc-dac4-4731-b2eb-90dd155917ba.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-27a96f40-b373-4f04-9251-208515017986.jpeg

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-e58f7e92-9b6d-472c-acd7-5429f40292ad.png

[thesheriff443]

it doesnt matter who they went to, its their call, I wouldnt trust the police either to do anything tbh not after recent events ....and historically like Saville and Rochdale where it was all swept aside by powerful people, not sure why you and Liam are victim blaming the mother in all this, she had done what she thought was right who is anyone to question that, we are not in her shoes and dont know her previous history with the police or otherwise

I’m not victim blaming so you can drop that for a start

Your happy to pull names out of a hat on who it could be

I like hard facts and professionals not the internet detectives, the same idiots that went down to the spot were Nichola bully drowned in the river

The met police are not perfect by any means and that’s because it’s human beings in uniforms at the end of the day, but without the police the world would be a free for all

[thesheriff443]

... ... ... ... ... ... I think the truth of the matter is likely that the 17 year old involved was probably already a drug addict unrelated to this, and was providing the pictures to fund their drug habit.

And with that in mind - to be frank - no I wouldn't be surprised if the parents of an already-drug-addicted 17 year old aren't telling the whole story and have ulterior motives.

In terms of whichever presenter is involved all of that is largely irrelevant - funding a child's drug habit by buying underage pornography of them is both illegal and morally abhorrent. Really just bottom-of-the-barrel low.

We don’t know if the presenter knew the 17 year old was supporting a drug habit with the money we also don’t know if the presenter knew their real age

So it’s all speculation .

[Kate!]

If who I'm seeing over and over again mentioned on socials is who it is, colour me absolutely gobsmacked because they're the last person I'd have thought would be caught up in something like this. Wow! :omgno:

Who is it? I'm dying to know?

[LaLaLand]

Who is it? I'm dying to know?

There's a photo doing the rounds on Twitter. :skull:

[bots]

Who is it? I'm dying to know?

Nick Robinson and Graham Norton are trending :laugh:

[Kate!]

There's a photo doing the rounds on Twitter. :skull:

I don't have twitter. Don't get the appeal xx

[arista]

There's a photo doing the rounds on Twitter. :skull:


Post it.


Eamon Holmes says it's a open secret
who it is?

[arista]

The Dirty Bugger BBC Presenter
phoned the home of the lad,
just last week
Asking "what have you done"


Reported on today's Sun
front page.

[Cherie]

I’m not victim blaming so you can drop that for a start

Your happy to pull names out of a hat on who it could be

I like hard facts and professionals not the internet detectives, the same idiots that went down to the spot were Nichola bully drowned in the river

The met police are not perfect by any means and that’s because it’s human beings in uniforms at the end of the day, but without the police the world would be a free for all


We have no other choice as the BBC are protecting the perv I said time and time again its unfair on the innocent maile pressenters who have to go public to say it is not them... you like hard facts, I have suggested a few people it might be ...whats the big deal about that exactly

We have a right to know who this person is I dont know why the BBC are protecting them and you have victim blamed saying the family should have gone to the police first that is not your call to make

[Cherie]

Post it.


Eamon Holmes says it's a open secret
who it is?

Nor another open secret :facepalm:

[arista]

Social Media is putting his Name out,
Reports say.


Another Twitter Fella
has used the Great Film Image:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F0pBlcmXsAEO6il?format=jpg&name=900x900

[bots]

Nick Robinson ticks all the right boxes

[Cherie]

Nick Robinson ticks all the right boxes

maybe

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F0oh1QyWcAM0F5d?format=png&name=900x900


This List is Stupid
BBC Confirmed it is a Man
not a BBC Woman Worker

So Mishal
should not be on this list


Also Dan Walker
works for Ch5HDnews
now
Not the BBC.

[bots]

thats a joke graphic arista with Norton on 100%

[arista]

thats a joke graphic arista with Norton on 100%


But, some presenters are getting Angry

[thesheriff443]

We have no other choice as the BBC are protecting the perv I said time and time again its unfair on the innocent maile pressenters who have to go public to say it is not them... you like hard facts, I have suggested a few people it might be ...whats the big deal about that exactly

We have a right to know who this person is I dont know why the BBC are protecting them and you have victim blamed saying the family should have gone to the police first that is not your call to make

You can’t see your own hypocrisy

You are going on about the innocent people at the bbc but at the same time happy to throw innocent names about.

Try going into a police station and demanding to see the names of those who have been accused of a crime, you will get told to do one.

[arista]

Lucy Frazer KC MP
Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport,
is in contact with BBC CEO Tim Davie.

Legal Expert on SkyNewsHD
said one of the problems
is the suspended worker
may have lawyers telling him not to speak
to the BBC.

[thesheriff443]

Lucy Frazer KC MP
Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport,
is in contact with BBC CEO Tim Davie.

Legal Expert on SkyNewsHD
said one of the problems
is the suspended worker
may have lawyers telling him not to speak
to the BBC.

The bbc are only his employer they not the police

[arista]

The bbc are only his employer they not the police


Yes, many hope the Police soon Arrest him
then his name is Front Page


Dirty Bugger BBC Worker

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F0pjjXmX0AAXlbx?format=jpg&name=900x900

[Cherie]

You can’t see your own hypocrisy

You are going on about the innocent people at the bbc but at the same time happy to throw innocent names about.

Try going into a police station and demanding to see the names of those who have been accused of a crime, you will get told to do one.

Lol …I’m suggesting names on TiBB in a jokey way you are moaning about the family and how they handled the situation …look in the mirror

[thesheriff443]

Lol …I’m suggesting names on TiBB in a jokey way you are moaning about the family and how they handled the situation …look in the mirror

No I won’t

If the family went to the police first you wouldn’t be joking about possible innocent people it could be.

Even those accused of a crime have rights.

Some how you think having a tv license gives you rights above and beyond the laws of this country.

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F0p9yk3WcAA6JC_?format=jpg&name=small

[arista]

No I won’t

If the family went to the police first you wouldn’t be joking about possible innocent people it could be.

Even those accused of a crime have rights.

Some how you think having a tv license gives you rights above and beyond the laws of this country.


We do not know what the Mother knows.
The BBC are slow in process
And the Police can now Arrest
that BBC Dirty Bugger.

[bots]

the bbc did nothing for 2 months after the allegation was first made. They have done their utmost to cover the whole thing up. That requires investigation

[arista]

the bbc did nothing for 2 months after the allegation was first made. They have done their utmost to cover the whole thing up. That requires investigation


Yes the BBC claim the first contact
2 months back was brief?

[Cherie]

There was another payment made AFTER the mother went to the BBC, she went to the BBC to ask them to stop the payments being made, in my view that was the right way to go as the payments are funding the drug habit, so she wanted to cut off the source ....how anyone can argue with that is mind boggling

[thesheriff443]

the bbc did nothing for 2 months after the allegation was first made. They have done their utmost to cover the whole thing up. That requires investigation

I think you are forgetting the recent events with Philip scholfield

ITV asked the questions and the presenter told them the accusations/rumours were not true, the same could be said about this situation

Look what happened to cliff Richard

People made false accusations, his home was raided live on tv

He was cleared and was he not awarded a massive some of money?

[Cherie]

I think you are forgetting the recent events with Philip scholfield

ITV asked the questions and the presenter told them the accusations/rumours were not true, the same could be said about this situation

Look what happened to cliff Richar

People made false accusations, his home was raided live on tv

He was cleared and was he not awarded a massive some of money?

The complaint was made on the 19th May...how long do the BBC need... they victim blamed the mother saying she didn't give them enough information, its only after it came out in the press they have swung into action....shameful

[Cherie]

Did Kay Burley just confirm it was a boy there, she mentioned 'son' then backtracked.

[thesheriff443]

The complaint was made on the 19th May...how long do the BBC need... they victim blamed the mother saying she didn't give them enough information, its only after it came out in the press they have swung into action....shameful

See reference to above post to bitontheside
Bbc ending up paying out 2 million to cliff Richard for getting it wrong

[Crimson Dynamo]

See reference to above post to bitontheside
Bbc ending up paying out 2 million to cliff Richard for getting it wrong

Cliff Richard was an allegation that could be denied

This case had phone conversations by text, money transfers and a pic of the accused semi-naked on the child's phone

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/07/10/07/73034477-0-image-m-4_1688972029203.jpg

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12281853/BBC-bosses-meet-police-star-sex-pics-scandal.html

[thesheriff443]

Cliff Richard was an allegation that could be denied

This case had phone conversations by text, money transfers and a pic of the accused semi-naked on the child's phone

If it can’t be proven that they were 17 at the time there is no criminal case
Just like Phil

[Liam-]

I hope the people being accused do end up suing those spreading lies about them

[Crimson Dynamo]

If it can’t be proven that they were 17 at the time there is no criminal case
Just like Phil

the evidence will all be dated (phone logs) so that wont be a problem

[bots]

If it can’t be proven that they were 17 at the time there is no criminal case
Just like Phil

it doesnt need to be a criminal case. Simply put, if the guy has tarnished the reputation of the bbc that is grounds for dismissal, end of. That's why this whole investigation drama is a joke. If they even have a sniff of impropriety, they can get shot of him

[thesheriff443]

it doesnt need to be a criminal case. Simply put, if the guy has tarnished the reputation of the bbc that is grounds for dismissal, end of. That's why this whole investigation drama is a joke. If they even have a sniff of impropriety, they can get shot of him

I’m not disagreeing with that but if there is no criminal case he will be given a lump sum to go quietly

[thesheriff443]

the evidence will all be dated (phone logs) so that wont be a problem

You don’t know that because it’s not the alleged victim making the claim it’s his mother

Who knows if the alleged victim will cooperate

Questions about Phil meeting the guy while under aged we’re asked the victim in that case gave no evidence to say any wrongdoing had gone on so no charge for mr Phil

[Crimson Dynamo]

Just said on Talk TV the presenter earns over £410,000 a year


https://www.prolificnorth.co.uk/news/manchester-news/2022/07/bbc-reveals-202122-top-presenter-salaries-list-full

[thesheriff443]

Just said on Talk TV the presenter earns over £410,000 a year


https://www.prolificnorth.co.uk/news/manchester-news/2022/07/bbc-reveals-202122-top-presenter-salaries-list-full

Phil was on a lot more

[Crimson Dynamo]

oop there is a bare-ar$e pic all over twitter

I think we will get the name today...

[thesheriff443]

oop there is a bare-ar$e pic all over twitter

I think we will get the name today...

Get the champagne ready

[bots]

oop there is a bare-ar$e pic all over twitter

I think we will get the name today...

so it's looking more likely my first guess was correct

[bots]

Huw was that?

The name sake of my lighting

[Niamh.]

I never heard of that guy

[Cherie]

I never heard of that guy

He covers all the big events for the BBC including announcing the Queens death :skull:

[Niamh.]

He covers all the big events for the BBC including announcing the Queens death :skull:

I don't really watch the BBC :shrug:

[bots]

it's kind of difficult to identify him from this pic

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F0lGdkSWYAABb0t?format=jpg&name=medium

[Crimson Dynamo]

the pic is rather disturbing

and i dont mean blobby

[bots]

images can easily be faked

[Crimson Dynamo]

images can easily be faked

and lets hope the jumper, watch, bedroom, pic in hallway and adjacent room have also been faked

:fc:

[bots]

and lets hope the jumper, watch, bedroom, pic in hallway and adjacent room have also been faked

:fc:

just ask prince andrew, he was never there

[Crimson Dynamo]

just ask prince andrew, he was never there

he can deny all he wants the pic was verified

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11687313/Proof-Prince-Andrew-photo-not-fake-Evidence-image-royal-Virginia-Giuffre-real.html

[bots]

ive just seen a pic of Huw and they have a pic of Jimmy Savilles face covering his ass :laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

ive just seen a pic of Huw and they have a pic of Jimmy Savilles face covering his ass :laugh:

i unfortunately saw the naked one D:

[Zizu]

just ask prince andrew, he was never there


… and he doesn’t sweat either ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

he can deny all he wants the pic was verified

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11687313/Proof-Prince-Andrew-photo-not-fake-Evidence-image-royal-Virginia-Giuffre-real.html


I recall seeing an image of him standing in a doorway waving goodbye to that girl !!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[user104658]

Just said on Talk TV the presenter earns over £410,000 a year


https://www.prolificnorth.co.uk/news/manchester-news/2022/07/bbc-reveals-202122-top-presenter-salaries-list-full

:umm2: They might as well just have said the name :joker:.

"I've heard that this presenter earned more than £411,288 last year!"

[bots]

i unfortunately saw the naked one D:

When asked today about 'that picture', Huw Edwards refused to be drawn and turned the other cheek...

[bots]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F0qn5LdWIAA1alZ?format=jpg&name=small

[rusticgal]

TIBB Force crack another case...:cheer2:

[thesheriff443]

Tibb men working themselves into a frenzy desperate to see another old man naked

[Cherie]

:umm2: They might as well just have said the name :joker:.

"I've heard that this presenter earned more than £411,288 last year!"

That was the point surely to out him without naming him :shrug:

[Cherie]

Tibb men working themselves into a frenzy desperate to see another old man naked

Hardly

[Cherie]

uw Edwards is married to Vicky Flind, a BBC producer and editor for This Week123. They have been married for over 20 years and have five children: Dan, Amos, Hannah, Rebecca, and Sammy13. They live in Dulwich, London1. Edwards has not been involved in any extramarital affairs3

poor woman and kids

[Cherie]

Huw Edwards arse, frequently asked questions

https://vandebharat.com/faqs-news/huw-edwards-arse/

[thesheriff443]

Hardly

Do you now identify as a man ?

[arista]

Many claim it is Graham Norton

He has that kind of Dosh

[Redway]

Rylan? Left Strictly it takes two, Radio 2, and got divorced?

Where’s he going to get 35 grand from just like that?

[arista]

He phoned the home
asking "What have you done"

on Friday

[Swan]

I've read that the BBC want to charge you more money for their tax scam depending on how much money you actually have. So basically, if you've worked hard, been sensible with money, and saved up a nice amount, the BBC plain to charge you more.

Seriously, everyone just needs to stop paying this revolting organisation.

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F0qn5LdWIAA1alZ?format=jpg&name=small


Graham Norton, Joe.

[Cherie]

Graham Norton, Joe.

mmmm I dont think it it?

[Niamh.]

No not Graham, I hope it isn't him

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/07/10/14/73044661-0-image-m-31_1688994831805.jpg

[Cherie]

No not Graham, I hope it isn't him

He has just got married, I dont think it is him

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1YqxoApvLmbGv?t=4m8s

welp

[Niamh.]

https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1YqxoApvLmbGv?t=4m8s

welp

Just listened to the start, from what they're saying it isn't Graham then because they said it's between two men and this person never said they were interested in men, that must rule openly gay men out

[Crimson Dynamo]

Just listened to the start, from what they're saying it isn't Graham then because they said it's between two men and this person never said they were interested in men, that must rule openly gay men out

did you make it to 4.10?

[Niamh.]

did you make it to 4.10?

I'm passed that now, why?

[Crimson Dynamo]

I'm passed that now, why?

go to 4.00 to 4.15

[Niamh.]

go to 4.00 to 4.15

OH :laugh2: can't believe I missed that

[Crimson Dynamo]

OH :laugh2: can't believe I missed that

Please hand in your badge and weapon on the way out :oh:

[Niamh.]

Please hand in your badge and weapon on the way out :oh:

:laugh:

[Beso]

I hope its Norton

[user104658]

I hope its Norton

I'm fairly certain it isn't but for the drama... it would be pretty explosive... :umm2:.

[Niamh.]

I'm fairly certain it isn't but for the drama... it would be pretty explosive... :umm2:.

Well if that video LT posted is right then it's definitely the original person named.

[user104658]

Well if that video LT posted is right then it's definitely the original person named.

Yeah I think whatever way the story goes the identity of the "accused" is known at this point.

Really tbh the worst part of this story is how freely other people's names were thrown around :umm2:.

[Zizu]

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230710/e4db5ffc67827c782a35180592179af8.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Beso]

https://www.mylondon.news/news/local-news/hanwell-pupils-lesson-bbcs-huw-5999068

[UserSince2005]

I hope its Norton

Its a member of BBC Staff, Norton is a contractor.

[Redway]

“Speculation” is a word what often gets badly misused but this is a prime example of it. There’s no putting going ’round x20 in circles about it on the basis of the very little we know. I’d rather stick to just discussing what happened rather than who exactly did what. That’s not for us to say at this point so let’s quit the gossip-speculation, yeah?

[user104658]

“Speculation” is a word what often gets badly misused but this is a prime example of it. There’s no putting going ’round x20 in circles about it on the basis of the very little we know. I’d rather stick to just discussing what happened rather than who exactly did what. That’s not for us to say at this point so let’s quit the gossip-speculation, yeah?

I agree when it comes to public discourse Redway (twitter and wider social media, and I don't think the press SHOULD do it, but they do) but honestly when it comes to good ol' TiBB these days I find the discussions here more akin to chatter in the home or a bit of workplace gossip.

We're a small anonymous group and the things we chat about here are of no concern to and have no effect on the wider world. It's just idle chatter to pass the time... sometimes it's fun to speculate.

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://tattle.life/attachments/screenshot_20230710-165859_chrome-jpg.2298347/

[user104658]

To be fair the young man was only selling pictures of his taint to aged TV presenters for crack money.

Good for him.

We won't shame an industrious king and also shouldn't shame his john either. A paying customer, supporting local business.

[Crimson Dynamo]

The chap in question's Instagram has now gone...

[Redway]

I agree when it comes to public discourse Redway (twitter and wider social media, and I don't think the press SHOULD do it, but they do) but honestly when it comes to good ol' TiBB these days I find the discussions here more akin to chatter in the home or a bit of workplace gossip.

We're a small anonymous group and the things we chat about here are of no concern to and have no effect on the wider world. It's just idle chatter to pass the time... sometimes it's fun to speculate.

I think with me I’m just anti-rumour when it comes to people you/we really don’t know at all but I have to acknowledge that analogy about office teas. I’m not even going to lie, I love a bit of workplace gossip.

[Zizu]

It seems clear enough who it is .. or is it ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Redway]

https://tattle.life/attachments/screenshot_20230710-165859_chrome-jpg.2298347/

We’ll just have to see.

[Zizu]

The chap in question's Instagram has now gone...


Seems like a done deal then .. .

“ no internet connection “



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Crimson Dynamo]

Seems like a done deal then .. .

“ no internet connection “


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

i feel it will be announced tonight

[Gusto Brunt]

'The star received an award ten days ago and then partied with BBC execs. But so far his name in unknown.'

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FzpaPY4WIAYidbx?format=jpg&name=small

[user104658]

I think with me I’m just anti-rumour when it comes to people you/we really don’t know at all but I have to acknowledge that analogy about office teas. I’m not even going to lie, I love a bit of workplace gossip.

Ideally these things wouldn't start circulating until the facts are more established but information travels too quickly for that to be possible these days. I also don't class these things in particular as "none of the public's business" - I do actually think it's in the public interest for us to know that so many of the very high paid faces that have been all over our screens for decades are just dirty bastards...

[UserSince2005]

If it is Huw then he needs to give me a call before he goes to prison because I would totally do him

[Redway]

Ideally these things wouldn't start circulating until the facts are more established but information travels too quickly for that to be possible these days. I also don't class these things in particular as "none of the public's business" - I do actually think it's in the public interest for us to know that so many of the very high paid faces that have been all over our screens for decades are just dirty bastards...

Yeah, no, I’m not necessarily saying that the general public has no right to know. I just don’t want the wrong names being tainted with a dodgy reputation based on something that has nothing to do with them. The BBC might never actually name the person and if that’s the case it’ll end up being a case of speculation directed at all the wrong people. It’s almost like when Samantha Womack got subjected to all that abuse in early 2011 (during the baby-swap storyline on Eastenders with her, Kat and Tommy) by people who couldn’t differentiate between Ronnie Mitchell and the actual actress. You don’t want the wrong people to be indefinitely tainted when there’s no way of actually knowing for sure who the perv is.

[Cherie]

https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1YqxoApvLmbGv?t=4m8s

welp

page gone what was it, send by pm please

[Crimson Dynamo]

WOW

The young person has denied claims that anything untoward has happened between them and the alleged perp.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Going against the Mum and the Sun :shocked:

letter to BBC today from a lawyer representing the 20 year old

[Cherie]

Going against the Mum and the Sun :shocked:

letter to BBC today from a lawyer representing the 20 year old

Hired a top legal team I wonder how he knew who to appoint a complete mystery

[Crimson Dynamo]

Hired a top legal team I wonder how he knew who to appoint a complete mystery

what with him being a crack addict?

they tend not to be the best critical thinkers

[Liam-]

So the mother goes to the persons boss rather than the police and the alleged ‘victim’ has denied everything and gone against their mother.. paid to keep quiet or is the mother a grifter out for some quick hopefully quick cash?

[Crimson Dynamo]

So the mother goes to the persons boss rather than the police and the alleged ‘victim’ has denied everything and gone against their mother.. paid to keep quiet or is the mother a grifter out for some quick hopefully quick cash?

maybe she is the addict and she saw an oppo to blackmail watching the Schofield thing playout?

[Cherie]

maybe she is the addict and she saw an oppo to blackmail watching the Schofield thing playout?

Why didn’t she take payment from the Sun then

[Cherie]

This has been handled so badly by the BBC who would want to work for them :joker:

[hijaxers]

So the mother goes to the persons boss rather than the police and the alleged ‘victim’ has denied everything and gone against their mother.. paid to keep quiet or is the mother a grifter out for some quick hopefully quick cash?

If she was out for quick cash she would have taken £££ from The Sun.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Why didn’t she take payment from the Sun then

maybe that is bollocks and she hasnt at mo but will at a later date

[Crimson Dynamo]

"Iv not taken any money for the story!"

will you though?

"not until August, then i get £250k"

[hijaxers]

Looks like back peddeling to save the 'person' bit late for that.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Looks like back peddeling to save the 'person' bit late for that.

it does make you wonder if someone has been given a brown envelope?:shocked:

[Crimson Dynamo]

surely the young person would deny it immediately not wait until some fancy lawyers had been hired?

this stinks

[thesheriff443]

WOW

The young person has denied claims that anything untoward has happened between them and the alleged perp.

If you go back a few pages i told you that but with your big head you told me evidence wouldn’t be a problem.

You lot on here are an embarrassment

The need to fill your lives with other peoples business is out of control

[Cherie]

Massive power at play here …just like Saville …would never happen again ha ha

[hijaxers]

it does make you wonder if someone has been given a brown envelope?:shocked:

Not improbable, but i still think the media is like a dog with a bone and its not going away. Just ask Phil.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Massive power at play here …just like Saville …would never happen again ha ha

rugs brushes and carpets

[Cherie]

If you go back a few pages i told you that but with your big head you told me evidence wouldn’t be a problem.

You lot on here are an embarrassment

The need to fill your lives with other peoples business is out of control

How naive can you get..where did the cash come from to employ a top legal firm…:whistle:

[Crimson Dynamo]

News at 10 should be appointment viewing...

[thesheriff443]

Massive power at play here …just like Saville …would never happen again ha ha

It’s nothing of the sort

The mother came forward to stop the son feeding his drug habit

The son wants to keep his drug habit fed so it’s bloody simple

But you can’t see the woods from the trees

[thesheriff443]

How naive can you get..where did the cash come from to employ a top legal firm…:whistle:

The son has a drug habit and is 20 now and still happy to take handfuls of cash for a few pics

But you can’t see it

The man don’t want to stop it’s the mother that wants it to stop

[bots]

the bbc can either let the story go on without naming him, in which case innocent bbc employees will continue to be under scrutiny until they do or name him and move on

[Crimson Dynamo]

why has the presenter stayed silent?

would you not come out and say "btw this is sh1te"

[bots]

The Sun have either got evidence or they don't. If they published this story without evidence, they will be in a whole world of trouble :laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

The Sun have either got evidence or they don't. If they published this story without evidence, they will be in a whole world of trouble :laugh:

they will go full News of the Screws

[Liam-]

Apparently the person claimed to be involved told the sun that this story wasn’t true before it was printed and they still went ahead with it anyway

[Cherie]

It’s nothing of the sort

The mother came forward to stop the son feeding his drug habit

The son wants to keep his drug habit fed so it’s bloody simple

But you can’t see the woods from the trees

And you are happy to pay the wages of a married man who presents a wholesome image who started this at 17 and worse than that knows what the money funds I wonder how he would feel if this was one of his kids …

[thesheriff443]

why has the presenter stayed silent?

would you not come out and say "btw this is sh1te"

Because he has done it

But without evidence there is no case to answer to

Are you just pretending to be thick ?

[Cherie]

Money went into a bank account is that not evidence?

[thesheriff443]

Money went into a bank account is that not evidence?

Not if you say it’s a gift

[thesheriff443]

And you are happy to pay the wages of a married man who presents a wholesome image who started this at 17 and worse than that knows what the money funds I wonder how he would feel if this was one of his kids …

It’s a big bad world out there

How many in the bbc are sucking boat loads of Charlie up there noses?

I’m sorry but you are a bread roll short of a picknick if you think you get to say what people spend their wages on

[bots]

LT has been too busy looking at male BBC presenters arses to do wordle today :fist:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Apparently the person claimed to be involved told the sun that this story wasn’t true before it was printed and they still went ahead with it anyway

where did you hear that?

[Crimson Dynamo]

LT has been too busy looking at male BBC presenters arses to do wordle today :fist:

iv been to Home Bargains to get Eye Bleach:nono:

[bots]

iv been to Home Bargains to get Eye Bleach:nono:

don't you mean ass bleach? :laugh:

[thesheriff443]

where did you hear that?

That again is standard
They go to the person to confirm or deny it and possibly give there side of the story

Hence when Phil came out in the sun newspaper

[Crimson Dynamo]

Jeremy Kyle just said further allegations on the presenters conduct in tomorrow's news

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://tattle.life/attachments/screenshot_20230710-191236_twitter-jpg.2298681/

[bots]

if the Sun have any evidence at all, it will go nuclear over night

[Crimson Dynamo]

the whole "crack addict" thing never sat right with me

are any gen z's addicted to crack these days?

[thesheriff443]

What a joke, people waiting for the sun news paper to produce evidence rather than the police.

[bots]

What a joke, people waiting for the sun news paper to produce evidence rather than the police.

thats because this is about public information rather than criminality. The police are more than likely to come back with no case to answer

[thesheriff443]

thats because this is about public information rather than criminality. The police are more than likely to come back with no case to answer

Let’s hope you are not accused of anything and someone goes to a news paper first

The sense of entitlement in this thread is frightening

[bots]

the BBC have suspended him, so, they think he has given the BBC a bad name too. You seem to have forgotten that the general public is legally libel to pay this persons salary, so the public have a right to expect a certain level of behaviour from employees

if it is true that this person phoned the guy and put pressure on him to drop the story, and then provided him with a team of lawyers. It stinks

[Cherie]

thats because this is about public information rather than criminality. The police are more than likely to come back with no case to answer

and they wonder why the mother didn't go to the police

technically Phil didn't do anything wrong, the advertisers thought otherwise and he is toast

I will be cancelling my DD off the back of this, fed up of paying paedo wages

[Cherie]

the BBC have suspended him, so, they think he has given the BBC a bad name too. You seem to have forgotten that the general public is legally libel to pay this persons salary, so the public have a right to expect a certain level of behaviour from employees

if it is true that this person phoned the guy and put pressure on him to drop the story, and then provided him with a team of lawyers. It stinks


it stinks to high heaven, he probably promised him more dosh to stay stum

[Crimson Dynamo]

If the Bun come out with receipts this could be the end of the BBC as a public-funded entity

if they dont...

[thesheriff443]

and they wonder why the mother didn't go to the police

technically Phil didn't do anything wrong, the advertisers thought otherwise and he is toast

I will be cancelling my DD off the back of this, fed up of paying paedo wages

Unless you disconnect your tv Ariel , you will be liable for prosecution

Taken to court and given a criminal record.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Unless you disconnect your tv Ariel , you will be liable for prosecution

Taken to court and given a criminal record.

:laugh2:

[Cherie]

Unless you disconnect your tv Ariel , you will be liable for prosecution

Taken to court and given a criminal record.


they will have to get me to answer the door first :hee:

[thesheriff443]

they will have to get me to answer the door first :hee:

A prisoner in your own home

[thesheriff443]

:laugh2:

What’s so funny ?

All those drugs you done has cooked your brain

[Crimson Dynamo]

The victim's lawyer defending the accused?

[UserSince2005]

So disappointed to see Christian Fraser on the bbc news channel right now. Was hoping it could have been him, he’s such a fitty

[Oliver_W]

technically Phil didn't do anything wrong, the advertisers thought otherwise and he is toast
Plenty of things which are legal are wrong - such as grooming a teenager, and sleeping with him while he's still a child.

Phil was obviously careful to visibly stay within the letter of the law, but whether or not he did anything wrong is apparently open to interpretation.

[Cherie]

A prisoner in your own home

I am in Spain for half the year, hardly :laugh:

[Alf]

1678317308576509954

[Crimson Dynamo]

how has a 20-year-old crack addict hired a top legal team?

are we all daft?

[thesheriff443]

I am in Spain for half the year, hardly :laugh:

Ok Charlie big bollox

It’s a different story when your in that courtroom

And for people that don’t know

Most people are in court for

Council tax debt
No Tv license
No Fishing lincence

[thesheriff443]

how has a 20-year-old crack addict hired a top legal team?

are we all daft?

The same way phils young lover had a top lawyer

And yes you are daft as a brush

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://tattle.life/attachments/screenshot-2023-07-10-at-20-11-12-png.2298866/

[Crimson Dynamo]

did the teen even know who the perp was

17 year olds dont watch bbc news?

[Cherie]

Ok Charlie big bollox

It’s a different story when your in that courtroom

And for people that don’t know

Most people are in court for

Council tax debt
No Tv license
No Fishing lincence

I believe it, always go after the easy targets

[Cherie]

https://tattle.life/attachments/screenshot-2023-07-10-at-20-11-12-png.2298866/

uh oh, don't think this is over by a long chalk, doesn't look like the parents are about to back down and who can blame them

[bots]

If the Sun have any evidence to back up the allegations, then this could go to a whole new level. It becomes a criminal case automatically if the alleged perp used coercion to try and shut the story down. It looks very like that is what has just gone down

[Crimson Dynamo]

GB news state parents are standing by their claims

[Oliver_W]

did the teen even know who the perp was

17 year olds dont watch bbc news?

Meh, he might know the presenter as "that bloke mum watches on the news while I scroll through" ... Insta/TikTok/Twitter/Face-one-that-kids-don't-use :laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://tattle.life/attachments/7b67b834-96a1-4a99-94e4-00a6960b3e7b-jpeg.2299029/

[Crimson Dynamo]

Presenter story marked by 'dangerous absence of facts', says ex-BBC executive
A former BBC news executive has claimed that a story alleging a presenter paid a teenager for sexual photos has a “dangerous absence of facts”.

Tim Luckhurst told the broadcaster: “This story has been marked from the beginning by a dangerous absence of facts, at every stage there have been more questions than answers and that remains the case tonight.

“The emphasis has shifted - now it seems that the parents may have raised concerns with The Sun concerns which did not directly reflect the concerns of their child.

“But at no stage in this story have we seen the full details that The Sun purports to have.

“I am beginning to suspect that the problem is that the facts are not entirely clear to The Sun, they’re not clear to the BBC either.”

[user104658]

My purely speculative speculation would be;

It happened as described

He didn't want to report it

Mum reported it

He's being paid to deny the whole thing.


Mess :joker:

[user104658]

and they wonder why the mother didn't go to the police

technically Phil didn't do anything wrong, the advertisers thought otherwise and he is toast

I will be cancelling my DD off the back of this, fed up of paying paedo wages

Unless you disconnect your tv Ariel , you will be liable for prosecution

Taken to court and given a criminal record.

they will have to get me to answer the door first :hee:

A prisoner in your own home

Not that I'd ever encourage illegal activity and of course anyone who watches live telly should have a license until they're abolished...

But...

I don't have a TV license (legitimately - we don't watch live TV or have a sky disk/aerial etc plugged in) and haven't had one for about 5 or 6 years now.

Like I said, it's legitimate - we don't watch live TV, just streaming and gaming in this house. HOWEVER... No one has ever checked. Not ever. Not a sniff.

[bots]

My purely speculative speculation would be;

It happened as described

He didn't want to report it

Mum reported it

He's being paid to deny the whole thing.


Mess :joker:

that's what i think, it's not a small time lawyer that is representing the kid. It really stinks pretty bad

[AnnieK]

I've not had a TV licence for years.....never had a knock at the door, or even a letter.

[Crimson Dynamo]

I've not had a TV licence for years.....never had a knock at the door, or even a letter.

same

[Zizu]

I've not had a TV licence for years.....never had a knock at the door, or even a letter.


Don’t they have all the tv licence records stored digitally and simply drive around with a radar equipped van or something ??

That’s the old story that was circulated years ago - think they showed warning adverts on telly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Crimson Dynamo]

Don’t they have all the tv licence records stored digitally and simply drive around with a radar equipped van or something ??

That’s the old story that was circulated years ago - think they showed warning adverts on telly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

that is such a fake news view

[AnnieK]

Don’t they have all the tv licence records stored digitally and simply drive around with a radar equipped van or something ??

That’s the old story that was circulated years ago - think they showed warning adverts on telly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Well if they have, they're literally years out of date. Like I said, it's been years and I've never even had as much as an email or letter, let alone a visit from a radar van. Something like 1% end up in court, I'll take my chances.

[Cherie]

Don’t they have all the tv licence records stored digitally and simply drive around with a radar equipped van or something ??

That’s the old story that was circulated years ago - think they showed warning adverts on telly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

When my son moved into his flat, he kept getting notices, in BIG RED LETTERS, we are coming, DONT IGNORE, he just binned them, no one ever came, 5 years in now ...

[user104658]

Don’t they have all the tv licence records stored digitally and simply drive around with a radar equipped van or something ??

That’s the old story that was circulated years ago - think they showed warning adverts on telly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

They have records of which addresses have a license. They definitely do not have "radar vans" :joker:. Completely debunked as a myth. They have to come into your house and physically check, and you don't need one just have a TV, it has to be being used to watch old-fashioned outdated live boomer TV.

[user104658]

When my son moved into his flat, he kept getting notices, in BIG RED LETTERS, we are coming, DONT IGNORE, he just binned them, no one ever came, 5 years in now ...

They do that if you don't "declare that you don't need a license" on the site, takes two minutes. If you do that, instead of the red letter, they send letters for a while thanking you for reporting that you don't need a license and saying that they "might come to check just to make sure" :joker:. Same thing with nicer wording basically. IIRC got those ever couple of months for about a year, then nothing.

[Cherie]

well, well, well, so it has been reported tonight on News at 10 that the step father went to the police before going to the BBC, but was told nothing illegal had taken place....it was only after that they went to the BBC and then finally in desperation to the press

[UserSince2005]

This is a mess

[bots]

this won't go away quietly. Either the presenter will be named or the Sun will be closed down. This is a high stakes play

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-239e0cd0-017d-4efd-86f7-b19655a7893f.png

[hijaxers]

this won't go away quietly. Either the presenter will be named or the Sun will be closed down. This is a high stakes play

:laugh: Can't see The Sun closing down , can you ?

[Liam-]

Some folks at GBeebies are gonna have to get some lawyers if the sun and done a goof

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-e68aeca2-970b-4eec-98f5-6957b99e7048.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-8e544763-d3a8-4f15-8ac9-214d97c2cf83.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-56b257a4-c8a8-4b38-a6f9-042a021db1f2.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-67fa9dec-9a4a-407e-a1eb-f80e07a613ca.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-9696efe8-ccb8-47ec-8f58-916dbd5cb176.jpeg

[bots]

1678578164434456576

[Cherie]

The police showing again they back powerful people over Joe Public, quelle surprise

[Cherie]

Some folks at GBeebies are gonna have to get some lawyers if the sun and done a goof

hic?

[Gusto Brunt]

Apparently the boy denies any involvement with the Welsh fella.

But err, if nothing happened, then why is the boy even being mentioned. :p

[Cherie]

ooop someone being interviewed by Kate Burley just said that the boy is an ex employee of the BBC, Kay then clarified that it has not been confirmed.... mmmmm

[Oliver_W]

ooop someone being interviewed by Kate Burley just said that the boy is an ex employee of the BBC, Kay then clarified that it has not been confirmed.... mmmmm

Y'know I did wonder how a high ranking presenter came across a minor in order to proposition them in the first place.

[hijaxers]

ooop someone being interviewed by Kate Burley just said that the boy is an ex employee of the BBC, Kay then clarified that it has not been confirmed.... mmmmm

History repeating itself .....mmmm exactly Cherie.

[Crimson Dynamo]

1678578164434456576

:joker:

[Crimson Dynamo]

But as i understand it it was the mum and stepdad who were concerned and went to the bbc and went to the sun. The boy in question was quite happy with his arrangement and never thought he was doing anything untoward and as it stands none of this has changed?

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://tattle.life/attachments/img_6295-png.2299871/

[Cherie]

But as i understand it it was the mum and stepdad who were concerned and went to the bbc and went to the sun. The boy in question was quite happy with his arrangement and never thought he was doing anything untoward and as it stands none of this has changed?

It depends when it started? and the funds are funding an addiction, they also went to the police first who said nothing to be seen here but surely that is incorrect if this started at 17?

[thesheriff443]

But as i understand it it was the mum and stepdad who were concerned and went to the bbc and went to the sun. The boy in question was quite happy with his arrangement and never thought he was doing anything untoward and as it stands none of this has changed?

Why are you asking questions when you already know the answer’s?

You have been told this from the start

Why are you playing thick ?

[thesheriff443]

It depends when it started? and the funds are funding an addiction, they also went to the police first who said nothing to be seen here but surely that is incorrect if this started at 17?

It’s not rocket science

There isn’t the evidence to back up the claim

[user104658]

Hmmmm I wonder, is the kid saying nothing at all happened, or is he saying its not true that he was 17 when it started? Lots of talk of "nothing illegal" happening and we know that some people think so long as you're 18 then there's no issue with things like getting banged by 60 year old married celebrities or buying/selling nudes online.

If he was 17 when it started, call the police. If it was his 18th birthday then let the kid get his money! Entrepreneurial king! Good for him!

[bots]

the young person is an addict with a drug habit to fund. They haven't stopped being an addict, and he has a bloke willing to fund the habit. Why would they speak against that and destroy the good thing they are on. I bet he/she is seriously pissed at the mum for trying to stop it. The person is 20 years old, the mother has no rights.

That's more than likely the situation as it stands.


It's a completely separate issue that a bbc presenter was behaving in an inappropriate way

[Oliver_W]

Hmmmm I wonder, is the kid saying nothing at all happened, or is he saying its not true that he was 17 when it started? Lots of talk of "nothing illegal" happening and we know that some people think so long as you're 18 then there's no issue with things like getting banged by 60 year old married celebrities or buying/selling nudes online.

If he was 17 when it started, call the police. If it was his 18th birthday then let the kid get his money! Entrepreneurial king! Good for him!

Yup, and it wasn't grooming in any way unless he explicity says the words "I was groomed" !!1

[Cherie]

Hmmmm I wonder, is the kid saying nothing at all happened, or is he saying its not true that he was 17 when it started? Lots of talk of "nothing illegal" happening and we know that some people think so long as you're 18 then there's no issue with things like getting banged by 60 year old married celebrities or buying/selling nudes online.

If he was 17 when it started, call the police. If it was his 18th birthday then let the kid get his money! Entrepreneurial king! Good for him!

That didn't really work for Schofield did it, the kid was of age when they entered relations ....

[Cherie]

It’s not rocket science

There isn’t the evidence to back up the claim

The Sun says it has evidence? bank statements are pretty concrete, unless he paid in cash up to age 18

At any rate he should be sacked for bringing the BBC into disrepute, and lets see if the kid really is an ex employee as suggested this morning by someone being interviewed by Kay Burley

[Crimson Dynamo]

parents say they have screenshots, bank statements and messages so that would be what they showed the Sun. The BBC suspended the person based on "new evidence"

SO there is plenty of evidence afoot it would appear

[Oliver_W]

That didn't really work for Schofield did it, the kid was of age when they entered relations ....

If the accusation that the photos were purchased and taken when the kid was seventeen, then it's a crime. But it's not a crime for letches to have ("consensual") sex with sixteen year olds.

[Cherie]

ueHmmmm I wonder, is the kid saying nothing at all happened, or is he saying its not true that he was 17 when it started? Lots of talk of "nothing illegal" happening and we know that some people think so long as you're 18 then there's no issue with things like getting banged by 60 year old married celebrities or buying/selling nudes online.

If he was 17 when it started, call the police. If it was his 18th birthday then let the kid get his money! Entrepreneurial king! Good for him!

They have already been to the police

Personally I don't blame them for pursueing this, 17/18, they are the ones picking up the pieces of an addict not the accused

[Cherie]

parents say they have screenshots, bank statements and messages so that would be what they showed the Sun. The BBC suspended the person based on "new evidence"

SO there is plenty of evidence afoot it would appear

good point, why suspend if nothing to see here

[thesheriff443]

Hmmmm I wonder, is the kid saying nothing at all happened, or is he saying its not true that he was 17 when it started? Lots of talk of "nothing illegal" happening and we know that some people think so long as you're 18 then there's no issue with things like getting banged by 60 year old married celebrities or buying/selling nudes online.

If he was 17 when it started, call the police. If it was his 18th birthday then let the kid get his money! Entrepreneurial king! Good for him!

Having no morals Isn’t a crime

Betting shops taking away kids food shopping money because the dad has a betting addiction , remember those days when that’s we’re your wage come from!

So give it a rest with the moral high ground bollox

[Cherie]

Also if the video of the accused in his pants is the BBC sofa then.......bringing your fetish to work day is not a thing as far as I know

[bots]

i thought it was mentioned somewhere that they were paid via paypal

[Cherie]

The stepdad of a youngster at the heart of a sex picture scandal involving a BBC presenter claims police told the family they "couldn't do anything".

The family claim the young person, who is now 20, was communicating with a top Beeb star for three years. However, he says when they initially reported concerns to police officers, they said there was nothing they could do.

The revelation comes after The Sun claimed the big-name BBC host had allegedly paid over £35,000 to the youngster for explicit pictures. Their mother says this money was used to fund a crack habit.

Speaking to the newspaper, the stepdad claimed the family only contacted the BBC initially because they wanted to cash payments to stop. This they said would "save" their vulnerable addict child.

The stepdad said: "I told the BBC I had gone to the police in desperation but they couldn't do anything as they said it wasn't illegal. They knew all of this."

He also said the money did not stop, adding: "I don't even think they spoke to him."

On Monday, July 10, BBC bosses and the Metropolitan Police held a meeting to look at information about the exchange between the youngster and the star.

The Metropolitan Police has said it is assessing the information discussed at the meeting and further enquiries are taking place to establish whether there is evidence of a criminal offence having been committed.

The Express

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/TheNewsAgents/status/1678455381419335680?s=20

[user104658]

Having no morals Isn’t a crime

Betting shops taking away kids food shopping money because the dad has a betting addiction, remember those days when that’s we’re your wage come from!

So give it a rest with the moral high ground bollox

I didn't say it was a crime - I'm not saying that there should be police involvement or that he should go to jail.

I'm also well aware that bookies are cess pits, there's a reason I studied & left :joker:. Unfortunately at the time, my own kid's food on the table came before the punter's kids.

I don't think the BBC presenter needed to ogle a young lad's cock in order to make a living :think:. I mean maybe, but it seems quite unlikely!

[user104658]

Tell you one thing that doesn't add up - £35000 on crack over three years. People do crack specifically because it's a cheaper high.

I reckon it was probably regular ol' cocaine. Sometimes people think they're the same thing, maybe his parents are saying "crack" but it's not actually crack.

I mean it's certainly possible but a £12000-a-year crack habit is a HEAVY habit...

[Beso]

Also if the video of the accused in his pants is the BBC sofa then.......bringing your fetish to work day is not a thing as far as I know

It worked for frank bough

[arista]

Great News if this happens
A Conservative MP may name the Dirty Bugger presenter
LIVE in Parliament

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/07/11/09/73075809-0-image-m-9_1689064007678.jpg

[Crimson Dynamo]

What would be the motivation for the young kid to get a lawyer anyroad?

[bots]

What would be the motivation for the young kid to get a lawyer anyroad?

Given that there is no apparent legal jeopardy for any party, it is a bit odd. He isn't intending to sue anyone, so he is paying a lawyer for nothing.

The lawyers letter said the parent spoke rubbish. Thats a very legal term indeed :laugh:

Also, it would have cost the kid at least 1k for the lawyer to send that letter, probably a lot more

[Crimson Dynamo]

Given that there is no apparent legal jeopardy for any party, it is a bit odd. He isn't intending to sue anyone, so he is paying a lawyer for nothing.

The lawyers letter said the parent spoke rubbish. Thats a very legal term indeed :laugh:

Also, it would have cost the kid at least 1k for the lawyer to send that letter, probably a lot more

They charge £725 per hour

[bots]

They charge £725 per hour

Each letter sent has a minimum fee, plus initial context chats

[Oliver_W]

What would be the motivation for the young kid to get a lawyer anyroad?

It's illegal for minors to send nudes.

[Crimson Dynamo]

It's illegal for minors to send nudes.

but a minor could not be prosecuted