Huw Edwards accused by multiple teens of inappropriate behaviour

[Crimson Dynamo]

It was reported he is living with his mother

Bloody hell, is there no end to his depravity?

[Cherie]

Bloody hell, is there no end to his depravity?

:laugh:

all jokes aside I am glad his wife turfed him out and the BBC should have sacked him for bringing his place of work into disrepute but thats BEEB for you

[arista]

:laugh:

all jokes aside I am glad his wife turfed him out and the BBC should have sacked him for bringing his place of work into disrepute but thats BEEB for you


Yes good point.

[arista]

Good he resigned

[bots]

He has been told by doctors it's not good for his health to wank over young boys pics .... thats a new one

[thesheriff443]

Bloody hell, is there no end to his depravity?

Maybe living with your mother is different in Scotland

[Mystic Mock]

[The BBC has apologised for the way
it handled a complaint about the
presenter Huw Edwards.
Allegations about his behaviour were made
in May 2023 but did not reach
senior managers until 6 July.
The corporation said the complaint was not
"escalated quickly enough" and that
it has now changed its processes.
[B]
An independent report by Deloitte into
the BBC's complaints handling procedure
said a complaint by the family of a
young person was made on the 18 May.

The report said the case was not logged properly
nor was there a "documented process"
for following up the allegations.
The Deloitte report said the initial contact by
the family was supposed to be escalated
to the relevant regional operations
security manager but this did not happen.
The complainant was signposted to
audience services, however, the day
after they made the complaint.

But the case was not logged on the
BBC's case management system
so there "was no opportunity for
wider visibility of the case within the BBC."

"There was no documented process for contact
with the complainant and/or follow up,"
the report noted.]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-68413999

And I'm a Nigerian Prince.

[arista]

Also posted on the
Rwanda thread


https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-aa433cd8-1525-4995-a6b6-e16f96259393.png

[arista]

He has been told by doctors it's not good for his health to wank over young boys pics .... thats a new one


Yes Dirty Bugger Edwards

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-779de721-d923-464f-80e5-d09c55fa5054.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-00d18c01-002a-4e04-813c-4a81035f01d7.png

[Mystic Mock]

He has been told by doctors it's not good for his health to wank over young boys pics .... thats a new one

Well it's alleged that the guy was 17 tbf.:laugh:

A boy personally is someone that I see as a baby-13 years old, not that I'm recommending adults hooking up with teenagers, but there's just a different level of depravity/perverted behaviour for me personally.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/04/22/23/83961985-0-image-m-6_1713823304723.jpg

[Family of young person at the centre
of Huw Edwards BBC scandal vow
'this is not the end' as they declare
they will keep fighting for
answers despite star's resignation]

[Today, it was announced Huw Edwards
resigned from his £439,000-a-year job]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13338005/huw-edwards-family-young-person-bbc-scandal-fighting.html

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GL1Chr0W0AAcmvp?format=jpg&name=small

[UserSince2005]

She should leave him.

Maybe she has girls on the side. This is a cute arrangement.

[Mystic Mock]

Maybe she has girls on the side. This is a cute arrangement.

The Lesbian dream? Don't tease me now.:joker:

But seriously, I don't know what possessed Huw to do what he has done to himself.

[bots]

Former BBC news presenter Huw Edwards, who resigned from the BBC on medical advice in April, saw his salary increase by £40,000 last year.

Edwards was suspended in July 2023 over allegations in The Sun newspaper of paying a young person for sexually explicit photos.

Police did not take any action against him, saying there was no evidence that a criminal offence had been committed.

He received between £435,000 and £439,999 in the year 2022/2023, which rose to £475,000 - £479,999 between April 2023 and April 2024, the BBC's latest annual report shows.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4ng8glnljyo

---------------------------

What the actual ****!

[user104658]

Former BBC news presenter Huw Edwards, who resigned from the BBC on medical advice in April, saw his salary increase by £40,000 last year.

Edwards was suspended in July 2023 over allegations in The Sun newspaper of paying a young person for sexually explicit photos.

Police did not take any action against him, saying there was no evidence that a criminal offence had been committed.

He received between £435,000 and £439,999 in the year 2022/2023, which rose to £475,000 - £479,999 between April 2023 and April 2024, the BBC's latest annual report shows.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4ng8glnljyo

---------------------------

What the actual ****!

That's not really all that surprising as we hit 10% inflation within the last couple of years, and many people's contracted pay rises are linked to the previous year's ROI, which would result in a £40k raise at that salary level. I got a roughly 15% increase last year (I genuinely can't remember if it was last year or the year before actually, but anyway) which was an incremental increase + the 10% inflation bump. Granted, I wasn't on £430k beforehand :joker:.

[AnnieK]

Huw Edwards has been charged and will appear in court charged with making indecent images of children

[bots]

maybe he will be joining gary glitter

[Cherie]

EX-BBC presenter Huw Edwards has been charged with making indecent images of children.

Veteran telly host Edwards, 62 – who quit the Beeb after 40 years in April – faces three charges over alleged activity between December 2020 and April 2022.

The offences are claimed to be linked to images shared on WhatsApp, police said.

Edwards will appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Wednesday morning.

The star was arrested last November by London's Met Police - and charged with the offences on Wednesday, June 26.

A Metropolitan Police spokesman said: "Huw Edwards, 62, of Southwark, London has been charged with three counts of making indecent images of children following a Met Police investigation.


Remember all those folks backing Huw and saying he had done nothing wrong...:idc:

[Cherie]

The BBC should be asking for the tax payer money they paid him while he was being treated for 'mental health issues' back

[GiRTh]

Disgraceful. The charges will be quite easy to prove. I recall he was angry about the charges and wouldnt resign. Lets see how cocky he is when sentenced.

[Gusto Brunt]

And the disgusting sex beast pervert peado is still being paid a half a million pounds by the BBC even though he does no work for the BBC. The BBC love peados like Edwards and Savile so no surprise. :mad:

[user104658]

And the disgusting sex beast pervert peado is still being paid a half a million pounds by the BBC even though he does no work for the BBC. The BBC love peados like Edwards and Savile so no surprise. :mad:

If he's convicted (as he should be) then they'll be able to sack him immediately - employment law means you can't get rid of people while they're just under investigation, just suspend them. Which is also important to maintain for various reasons.

[arista]

Huw Edwards has been charged and will appear in court charged with making indecent images of children


Good news

[thesheriff443]

Do the three charges relate to that one lad who was sending pics for cash ?

[Cherie]

Do the three charges relate to that one lad who was sending pics for cash ?

Unless they reopened that investigation then no

The BBC News presenter, 62, was suspended
by the corporation in July after it was claimed
he had paid thousands of pounds for sexual images.
Police investigators found no evidence of any
criminal wrongdoing by the presenter,
and it is expected Mr Edwards will now have
the opportunity to respond to the inquiry.]

[Gusto Brunt]

If he's convicted (as he should be) then they'll be able to sack him immediately - employment law means you can't get rid of people while they're just under investigation, just suspend them. Which is also important to maintain for various reasons.

He's revolting.

[Crimson Dynamo]

This aged well

Owen Jones
@OwenJones84

The Sun is a disgusting rag and they have to pay for what they’ve done to Huw
Edwards.

They tried to destroy someone’s life with false claims of illegality involving a minor.

We know now there was no criminality, and The Sun have driven a vulnerable man into medical care.

https://x.com/OwenJones84/status/1679199096089845760

[Mystic Mock]

If there's multiple examples of him doing this then there is no defense imo.

[Alf]

BBC again.

They're still stealing our hard earned money though.

[Crimson Dynamo]

BBC again.

They're still stealing our hard earned money though.

if anyone is still paying that paedo tax they are mugs

dont pay

they cant do anything about it

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-8d77455b-6d7d-4116-a9cc-ac713e788e5d.jpeg

[user104658]

Category A. Absolutely horrendous really. Just so grim.

[bots]

it's so obvious that this is just the tip of the iceberg as to what he has been up to

[Mystic Mock]

It's interesting how it's only coming out about him now.

[Cherie]

Category A is jail time

[arista]

Good he left the BBC


In Court on Weds

Jail him.

[Ammi]

…what an update for his wiki page …6 category A images, 12 category B images and 19 category C images…

[Cherie]

who was he sharing Whatapp with, he had alot of powerful people telling the world he did nothing wrong...even after it emerged he was paying a 17 year old for pictures

[bots]

who was he sharing Whatapp with, he had alot of powerful people telling the world he did nothing wrong...even after it emerged he was paying a 17 year old for pictures

its definitely is the tip of the iceberg, when they get found out, it always is. He could have belonged to the same ring that Saville was involved in

[user104658]

its definitely is the tip of the iceberg, when they get found out, it always is. He could have belonged to the same ring that Saville was involved in

Exactly, if that's what's been discovered from something as mainstream as his WhatsApp then there will likely have been a lot, lot more hidden on dodgy "burner phones" and accessed via darkweb. He probably has a 2nd smartphone sitting at the bottom of the Thames.

[Crimson Dynamo]

The 37 images probably is a cover up and we are just being given enough to jail him and protect all the other names involved...

[Cherie]

The 37 images probably is a cover up and we are just being given enough to jail him and protect all the other names involved...

There was a guy on LBC this morning with Nick and he was babbling on about Huw 'only' having a small amount of pics on his phone when you would normally find 1,000s....

[Livia]

One image is one too many.

[GiRTh]

Disgraceful. I distinctly remember the word 'angry' being used regard how he felt. I recall many people sympathised at the time as they thought the charges weren't real

We need some prison time for him to show him a lesson

[user104658]

There was a guy on LBC this morning with Nick and he was babbling on about Huw 'only' having a small amount of pics on his phone when you would normally find 1,000s....

They found them on a WhatsApp group on his phone so I reckon he's had another device with more (like I said, long gone sitting at the bottom of the Thames. Or literally burned.) but he's forgotten to make sure his messaging apps were clear. Probably deleted things not realising they could be recovered.

[bots]

he has pled guilty, obviously hoping for a light sentence

[Ammi]

…I would say that with the images apparently found, it would be difficult to plead any other way…I can’t imagine a legal representative taking on a not guilty plea with what’s unfolded…

[Crimson Dynamo]

If found guilty, he could receive a maximum penalty of six months imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine.

[arista]

He has plead Guilty

[arista]

he has pled guilty, obviously hoping for a light sentence



Yes could be his plan.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/07/31/09/87982791-0-image-a-35_1722414528741.jpg

[arista]

[Ex-BBC star claims pictures of children aged between
seven and 14 'were sent to him by a paedophile'
on Whats]

Dirty Peado git


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13692595/huw-edwards-guilty-child-pornography-charges-court-appearance.html

[Ammi]

Edwards was emotionless after pleading guilty to the charges and sat staring into the distance, with his head tilted slightly upwards.

In a statement, the Metropolitan Police said he was arrested in November last year and charged on June 26.

Edwards, who was one of the BBC’s most prominent and highest-paid news anchors before he left the corporation in April on medical grounds, could receive a maximum penalty of 10 years’ imprisonment.

During his career, he fronted BBC’s News At Ten for 20 years and anchored coverage of major national events including announcing Queen Elizabeth II’s death on the BBC and presenting coverage of her funeral.

…full article…
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/huw-edwards-indecent-images-children-court-bbc-b2588644.html

[arista]

[There were two moving images of a young child,
possibly aged between seven and nine years old,
according to prosecutors.]

Dirty Peado Git

https://news.sky.com/story/huw-edwards-set-to-appear-in-court-after-being-charged-with-making-indecent-images-of-children-13187776

[Cherie]

Grim

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/07/31/09/87982547-13692191-Edwards_faced_a_media_frenzy_as_he_arrived_at_West minster_Magist-m-49_1722416061030.jpg

A Camera/Reporter dropped his camera
in the scrum.

BBC reporter informed us.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/07/31/11/87986469-0-image-m-18_1722420992860.jpg

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/07/31/11/87986517-13692595-image-a-11_1722421064066.jpg

[arista]

Roll on Monday 16th of September

Jail him

[arista]

He was Arrested
while still being paid by the BBC.

So they will have Questions

Ref: Adam Boulton, Times Radio Live.

[arista]

Ch5HDnews stated
his WhatsApp had moving images of kids under the legal age

They must Jail him.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Was it a BBC phone?

[thesheriff443]

Ch5HDnews stated
his WhatsApp had moving images of kids under the legal age

They must Jail him.

He was sent them by a man on a what’s app chat

It’s worrying that if someone sends you a picture and you open it without even knowing its contents you are then guilty

[Beso]

The man asked what he wanted, hew said nothing illegal.. the failure to report the man has cost him dearly.

[Cherie]

He was sent them by a man on a what’s app chat

It’s worrying that if someone sends you a picture and you open it without even knowing its contents you are then guilty

They had been chatting previously they weren't discussing the weather

[thesheriff443]

They had been chatting previously they weren't discussing the weather

Yes they had been exchanging pictures legal pictures obviously porn but legal
All the pictures and two moving images came from the man he was talking to.

It reads that he made the images but he is guilty because he opened the images

No other images were found on any of his other devices

[Cherie]

Yes they had been exchanging pictures legal pictures obviously porn but legal
All the pictures and two moving images came from the man he was talking to.

It reads that he made the images but he is guilty because he opened the images

No other images were found on any of his other devices

Yes he liked just legal however the underage ones were sent on separate occasions so he must have known what they were

He continued: 'In February 2021 a further five indecent images of children were sent to Mr Edwards (and) read or opened by him in the chat.

'The final indecent images of a child was sent in August 2021, it was a cat-A moving film which depicted a male child of younger age than virtually all of the other indecent images of children.


Surely after opening the first one you would ask the guy to stop he has a particular liking for teenage boys obviously

[thesheriff443]

Yes he liked just legal however the underage ones were sent on separate occasions so he must have known what they were

He continued: 'In February 2021 a further five indecent images of children were sent to Mr Edwards (and) read or opened by him in the chat.

'The final indecent images of a child was sent in August 2021, it was a cat-A moving film which depicted a male child of younger age than virtually all of the other indecent images of children.

Yea I read the charges
I can’t see him getting a lot of time

[Zizu]

Yes he liked just legal however the underage ones were sent on separate occasions so he must have known what they were

He continued: 'In February 2021 a further five indecent images of children were sent to Mr Edwards (and) read or opened by him in the chat.

'The final indecent images of a child was sent in August 2021, it was a cat-A moving film which depicted a male child of younger age than virtually all of the other indecent images of children.


Surely after opening the first one you would ask the guy to stop he has a particular liking for teenage boys obviously


For a moment I wondered what the hell he was doing looking at a picture of a CAT !!

[emoji2]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Gusto Brunt]

Apparently he never raped children like Savile, Stuart Hall, and Rolf Harris did, but Edwards has to go down as one of the sickest people to have ever been on TV in a once respected role.

Looking at pics - and perhaps masturbating at vile photos of kids as young as 7 years old being abused is as bad as abusing them himself, in my view.

Good on his ex wife for getting shot of him.

[thesheriff443]

Yes he liked just legal however the underage ones were sent on separate occasions so he must have known what they were

He continued: 'In February 2021 a further five indecent images of children were sent to Mr Edwards (and) read or opened by him in the chat.

'The final indecent images of a child was sent in August 2021, it was a cat-A moving film which depicted a male child of younger age than virtually all of the other indecent images of children.


Surely after opening the first one you would ask the guy to stop he has a particular liking for teenage boys obviously

Apparently he never raped children like Savile, Stuart Hall, and Rolf Harris did, but Edwards has to go down as one of the sickest people to have ever been on TV in a once respected role.

Looking at pics - and perhaps masturbating at vile photos of kids as young as 7 years old being abused is as bad as abusing them himself, in my view.

Good on his ex wife for getting shot of him.
Unfortunately the justice system doesn’t work on basis of morals only in terms of breaking the law

[thesheriff443]

All going in his favour
First time offender
Isolated to this one man
No other images found on any other devices
Images were deleted and not shared

[arista]

Alex Williams, 25
named as sending the images.
(convicted paedophile)



SkyNewsHD Live

[Cherie]

All going in his favour
First time offender
Isolated to this one man
No other images found on any other devices
Images were deleted and not shared

Once a nonce always a nonce

[Cherie]

Apparently he never raped children like Savile, Stuart Hall, and Rolf Harris did, but Edwards has to go down as one of the sickest people to have ever been on TV in a once respected role.

Looking at pics - and perhaps masturbating at vile photos of kids as young as 7 years old being abused is as bad as abusing them himself, in my view.

Good on his ex wife for getting shot of him.

Yes good for her

[MTVN]

They included seven category A images, the most serious classification - two of which showed a child aged between about seven and nine.

Category A images show serious abuse including penetrative sexual activity.

He also had 12 category B pictures, which involve non-penetrative sexual activity, and 22 photographs in category C, which covers other indecent images. The category B and C pictures showed children aged between 12 to 15.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c880zykre4lo

Sick ****er, can be no excuse.

BBC also knew he'd been arrested in November after which time he received £250k in salary

[joeysteele]

What a sick minded creep.

This is and should be yet another massive and shameful scandal for the BBC.

It makes me feel really sick inside.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/07/31/14/87985451-0-Protesters_stood_outside_Westminster_Magistrates_C ourt_holding_p-a-9_1722434163456.jpg


Protestors outside the Court

[thesheriff443]

Once a nonce always a nonce

Yes but a free nonce rather than held in prison

[Cherie]

Yes but a free nonce rather than held in prison

You seem happy about that, what a strange outlook

[bots]

The BBC still have predators in plain sight in high profile positions. That's my major takeaway from all this.

[Crimson Dynamo]

The BBC still have predators in plain sight in high profile positions. That's my major takeaway from all this.

all frantically deleting pics and videos from their phones

[Beso]

Unfortunately the justice system doesn’t work on basis of morals only in terms of breaking the law

The justice system isnt fit for purpose sheriff. Only thing its fit for is the wallet of all the lawyers.

[thesheriff443]

You seem happy about that, what a strange outlook

You want to leave the mind reading alone cherie because you can’t read my mind.

[thesheriff443]

The justice system isnt fit for purpose sheriff. Only thing its fit for is the wallet of all the lawyers.

It will only work if you have zero tolerance and that’s never going to happen to many do gooders

[Beso]

It will only work if you have zero tolerance and that’s never going to happen to many do gooders

A famous youtuber has suggested we let the king and the military take control for 1 year only. Twitter banned him.:joker:

[Beso]

Wait till you see the new graphics sherriff, it's amazing.

[Crimson Dynamo]

don t people on here support and post this creep Owens tweets?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTwUT5LW8AAqdu2?format=jpg&name=small

[Barry.]

don t people on here support and post this creep Owens tweets?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTwUT5LW8AAqdu2?format=jpg&name=small

He didn’t know he was guilty. It’s kind of like you excusing Donald trump even though he was found guilty of rape

[Crimson Dynamo]

He didn’t know he was guilty. It’s kind of like you excusing Donald trump even though he was found guilty of rape

he wasn't and stop peddling lies it could get you in serious trouble

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-was-donald-trump-found-guilty-rape-1799935

please read that fact checked link and desist from spreading fake news and defamation on Tibb

Mods can you delete his post?

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/07bd/live/4d356300-4f7f-11ef-8f0f-0577398c3339.jpg.webp

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/65f2/live/765aa3e0-4f7e-11ef-b2d2-cdb23d5d7c5b.jpg.webp

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/9779/live/7ee13a80-4f81-11ef-aebc-6de4d31bf5cd.jpg.webp

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/7456/live/b043a260-4f82-11ef-b2d2-cdb23d5d7c5b.jpg.webp

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/91e3/live/2493a2a0-4f83-11ef-b2d2-cdb23d5d7c5b.png.webp

[Ammi]

…it’s not just that he opened Category A images, it’s that they were from convicted paedophile …and he would have known that so he would pretty much anticipate the vein of the content…’I don’t want anything illegal’ just has the vein of him giving that as an automatic thing of thinking he’s not as compliant/not as participating…it translates to me as…oh no/oh go on then…he’s just completely abhorrent….

[bots]

he is obviously taking the fall to protect his paedo buddies and thats what angers me. It's no coincidence that we have yet another senior bbc tv presenter found out

[user104658]

He didn’t know he was guilty. It’s kind of like you excusing Donald trump even though he was found guilty of rape

Careful there, "rape apologist" is a real trigger term for TiBB's dominant cohort of aging blokes. Does not go down well whatsoever for some reason.

[Beso]

Careful there, "rape apologist" is a real trigger term for TiBB's dominant cohort of aging blokes. Does not go down well whatsoever for some reason.

2 tier modding if SB, doesnt get banned from this discussion for insulting forum members.

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GT1gH2HXgAASDfN?format=jpg&name=small


Yes, it will affect the UK BBC News.

Edwards should return the Extra 200K
to the BBC.

[user104658]

2 tier modding if SB, doesnt get banned from this discussion for insulting forum members.

Which forum members am I discussing? I'm discussing the current political condition of the forum in general, not anyone specifically.

Although, I don't get banned for that either. But neither does anyone else so it's not really 2-tier is it.

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTwUNMWXAAAuP9j?format=jpg&name=small

[Crimson Dynamo]

I hope he takes the time he needs to recover from this poisonous witch hunt, so he can come back and take action against those that publicly slandered him as a sex offender

this aged well

:umm2:

[Cherie]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTwUNMWXAAAuP9j?format=jpg&name=small

Apart from Emily Matliss and Owen Jones I dont know who these people are, anyone care to name them please?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Apart from Emily Matliss and Owen Jones I dont know who these people are, anyone care to name them please?

Emily Matlis and John Sopel are 2 of them

[UserSince2005]

ashamed i called him daddy now

[Cherie]

ashamed i called him daddy now

at least you are owning it

[Livia]

this aged well

:umm2:

He may not be right but at least he's consistent.

[UserSince2005]

at least you are owning it

I just thought he liked to treat younger boys well, and so was looking for his cash.

But didnt realise he was actually a pedo.

[arista]

I just thought he liked to treat younger boys well, and so was looking for his cash.

But didnt realise he was actually a pedo.


Yes one a 9 years old Boy Sex Video

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/08/01/15/88044369-0-image-m-34_1722522129586.jpg

[arista]

Huw Edwards invited me to share his hotel room
before Prince Philip's funeral, says young male TV worker

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/08/01/14/88042507-13340201-image-a-31_1722519812622.jpg

Yes Good on Young Male BBC Worker
not going to get raped


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13340201/Huw-Edwards-invited-worker-hotel-room-Prince-Philip-funeral-BBC.html

[Cherie]

Huw Edwards invited me to share his hotel room
before Prince Philip's funeral, says young male TV worker

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/08/01/14/88042507-13340201-image-a-31_1722519812622.jpg

Yes Good on Young Male BBC Worker
not going to get raped


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13340201/Huw-Edwards-invited-worker-hotel-room-Prince-Philip-funeral-BBC.html

Missed a great night :skull: the disrespect.....I am sure this had to be common knowledge around the BBC?

[bots]

BBC boss defends not sacking Edwards even though he knew he was charged over the most serious category of indecent images of children :skull:


Heads are going to roll here

[joeysteele]

The more that's revealed on this the more sickening it gets.

What a creep.

I really just don't understand how things like this are not known at the BBC.
However surely there were some tell tale signs.

Of course then Jimmy Saville fooled just about everyone including one of the strongest PMs the UK ever had in Mrs Thatcher.

Cases like these however show some massive wrongs in the processes of the BBC and how it monitors it's staff.
People talk about hindsight being an excuse on issues.
Well now with the knowledge and hindsight on Edwards.
I feel sick inside I watched him, on news, election programmes, Royal events and it's even tarnished the announcement of the late Queen's death too.

Thinking now I was hanging on to everything this creep was presenting to us.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Peter Cardwell the excellent Talk Political commentator worked with Edwards a while ago. He never found him to be weird but since we all found out about this dirty BBC Paedo he has been contacted by 2 old
colleagues he also worked with back then who said "yes he did perve on us but were too scared back then due to his rep - who do we tell now?"



sickening

[arista]

Missed a great night :skull: the disrespect.....I am sure this had to be common knowledge around the BBC?


Yes
the Good Young Male BBC worker
would have informed his mates at the BBC

[arista]

BBC boss defends not sacking Edwards even though he knew he was charged over the most serious category of indecent images of children :skull:


Heads are going to roll here


Yes Tim Davie (BBC CEO)
was all the Police told us
"we must keep this secret"
As future trouble in Court.


Of course Dirty Edwards plead Guilty
so he has a plan.

[arista]

A live debate just on
BBCnewsHD

Had a Former CNN reporter
saying he thinks Edwards so-called
mental heath problems,
was fake.

As more grim news has appeared
of a sex video of a 9-year-old boy.

[GoldHeart]

The more that's revealed on this the more sickening it gets.

What a creep.

I really just don't understand how things like this are not known at the BBC.
However surely there were some tell tale signs.

Of course then Jimmy Saville fooled just about everyone including one of the strongest PMs the UK ever had in Mrs Thatcher.

Cases like these however show some massive wrongs in the processes of the BBC and how it monitors it's staff.
People talk about hindsight being an excuse on issues.
Well now with the knowledge and hindsight on Edwards.
I feel sick inside I watched him, on news, election programmes, Royal events and it's even tarnished the announcement of the late Queen's death too.

Thinking now I was hanging on to everything this creep was presenting to us.

People need to wake up and smell the coffee, Thatcher knew Saville was a pedo...and even if she wasn't sure , the rumours were flying around yet she still associated with him. Plenty of people knew what Saville was up to and either turned a blind eye or instead just whispered about it.

'The reckoning' was a real eye opening at just how sleazy and manipulative he was. He thought and knew he could get away with his crimes, he kept treating it like some ' little hiccup he can cover up / make go away ' . He distracted everyone with so called charity work , he wanted to be seen as some saint . Truly sickening creature .

So the exact same will likely be with Edwards, especially if he was as bold as this with texts messages and arranging to meet etc. people probably had a feeling Edwards was a perv .

[arista]

MP Lisa Nandy
(Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport)
did not bother going into the BBC
in Central London.

She just gave CEO of the BBC Tim Davie
a phone call.


Ref: Newsnight Debate BBC2HD

[bots]

People need to wake up and smell the coffee, Thatcher knew Saville was a pedo...and even if she wasn't sure , the rumours were flying around yet she still associated with him. Plenty of people knew what Saville was up to and either turned a blind eye or instead just whispered about it.

'The reckoning' was a real eye opening at just how sleazy and manipulative he was. He thought and knew he could get away with his crimes, he kept treating it like some ' little hiccup he can cover up / make go away ' . He distracted everyone with so called charity work , he wanted to be seen as some saint . Truly sickening creature .

So the exact same will likely be with Edwards, especially if he was as bold as this with texts messages and arranging to meet etc. people probably had a feeling Edwards was a perv .

the 70's and 80's were a completely different time, society wasn't the same as it is now. The term pedo didn't exist

When I was at school we had a headmaster that was a pedo. All the kids knew that he liked to touch up little boys, but he remained headmaster for years. Nobody thought to call the police or anything like that, they just kept out of his way

[arista]

Apart from Emily Matliss and Owen Jones I dont know who these people are, anyone care to name them please?

Next Emily
is a former SkyNews reporter
now working for LBC Lewis Goodall
you would have heard him
when he filled in

Next Lewis
the Former BBC USA reporter
Jon Sopel,

All three of them with Emily are this team:
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/news-agents-emily-maitlis-jon-sopel-lewis-goodal-podcast/

The fella with glasses is a money backer

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTwUNMWXAAAuP9j?format=jpg&name=small

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-8e3ddd0a-269d-4598-b0f9-56c47da629ab.png

[GoldHeart]

the 70's and 80's were a completely different time, society wasn't the same as it is now. The term pedo didn't exist

When I was at school we had a headmaster that was a pedo. All the kids knew that he liked to touch up little boys, but he remained headmaster for years. Nobody thought to call the police or anything like that, they just kept out of his way

Yeah it was a different time , but people still knew what a creep was back then. But it seems they got away with alot that frankly wouldn't slide today.

That's another thing i meant to add aswell ... people like that in certain positions of power think they're untouchable , or they convince their victims that nobody will believe them. Saville behaved like he had control over people, he looked like he was calling the shots and best buddies with members of the royal family aswell, which is unbelievable .

It's pretty disgusting and shocking when a known predator can just carry on though, and people have to just 'stay out their way' . Someone that dangerous having that much influence and still being allowed to work around anyone let alone children... is just mind baffling:umm2::suspect: .

[Gusto Brunt]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-8e3ddd0a-269d-4598-b0f9-56c47da629ab.png

He's absolutely revolting. Unlike Savile who we all know what he was even before his crimes came out.

Edwards hid it so well. Lord knows what other sex peado crimes he's done. I think we might be skimming the surface.

[joeysteele]

He's absolutely revolting. Unlike Savile who we all know what he was even before his crimes came out.

Edwards hid it so well. Lord knows what other sex peado crimes he's done. I think we might be skimming the surface.

That's my thinking too.
Your second point really concerning.

[arista]

Yes Gusto
it stinks

[user104658]

He's absolutely revolting. Unlike Savile who we all know what he was even before his crimes came out.

Edwards hid it so well. Lord knows what other sex peado crimes he's done. I think we might be skimming the surface.

I think they're striking cases in different ways. Saville because, in hindsight, it's so obvious that he was a very very strange man that it seems bizarre he was ever such a huge and well regarded celebrity. A real oddball.

Edwards is almost the opposite - outwardly an extremely normal and straight-laced guy... but absolutely horrendous demons hiding behind the facade. Which I think for obvious reasons, seems "scarier". We all like to think we can spot "a Saville" lurking. It's scarier when you realise that completely average-seeming blokes might be monsters.

[GiRTh]

One thing that bothered me is the BBC saying they knew nothing of the investigation by the Met. Bullsh*t.

Investigations departments talk to each other because one investigation may impact the other. SO when the BBc Spokesperson on the news last night was claiming they knew nothing, I was shouting bullsh*t at the screen.


The BBC needs to be very carful how they handle this but its clear they dont give a ******. To give him a pay rise during his suspension. The optics are terrible. They also need to explain why they weren't more involved in the Met investigation not claim they knew nothing about it.

[bots]

i honestly think there is and probably always has been a pedo ring at the BBC. There have been too many incidents now where the BBC claim to be completely unaware. It's the type of organisation that could easily hide nasty goings on all paid for by the general public.

It's grown way too big, it needs to be cut right back to provide news and public service announcements only. They could realistically run an operation with 100 employees and the public could contribute £1 every 5 years for its continued existance

[user104658]

One thing that bothered me is the BBC saying they knew nothing of the investigation by the Met. Bullsh*t.

Investigations departments talk to each other because one investigation may impact the other. SO when the BBc Spokesperson on the news last night was claiming they knew nothing, I was shouting bullsh*t at the screen.


The BBC needs to be very carful how they handle this but its clear they dont give a ******. To give him a pay rise during his suspension. The optics are terrible. They also need to explain why they weren't more involved in the Met investigation not claim they knew nothing about it.

TBF on the pay rise I genuinely reckon that will have been contractually pre-arranged and they wouldn't have had grounds to break the contract while he was just "under investigation" without opening themselves up to legal action had nothing come of the accusations. It's different now that he's been charged. I doubt they sat round a table and said "Let's give him more money!" they'll have consulted a legal team and been advised to honour what was in his current contract (for the time being).

[GiRTh]

TBF on the pay rise I genuinely reckon that will have been contractually pre-arranged and they wouldn't have had grounds to break the contract while he was just "under investigation" without opening themselves up to legal action had nothing come of the accusations. It's different now that he's been charged. I doubt they sat round a table and said "Let's give him more money!" they'll have consulted a legal team and been advised to honour what was in his current contract (for the time being).I thought he was suspended. IF so then the pay rise should have been suspended too.

I think they had another brain fart or they thought the charges would go away. Either way I see nothing other than incompetence by the BBC ,again.

[Ammi]

TBF on the pay rise I genuinely reckon that will have been contractually pre-arranged and they wouldn't have had grounds to break the contract while he was just "under investigation" without opening themselves up to legal action had nothing come of the accusations. It's different now that he's been charged. I doubt they sat round a table and said "Let's give him more money!" they'll have consulted a legal team and been advised to honour what was in his current contract (for the time being).

I thought he was suspended. IF so then the pay rise should have been suspended too.

…yeah, just what Girth said, I was about to say….i wouldn’t have said that any contract would have been ‘airtight’ so that the raise couldn’t have been suspended also and then back paid if that eventually came about that he was cleared of any wrong doing…especially as the BBC is a public financed organisation, so that has to be factored as well in contracts…

[user104658]

…yeah, just what Girth said, I was about to say….i wouldn’t have said that any contract would have been ‘airtight’ so that the raise couldn’t have been suspended also and then back paid if that eventually came about that he was cleared of any wrong doing…especially as the BBC is a public financed organisation, so that has to be factored as well in contracts…

Contracts tend to stipulate full pay during suspension unless there are established grounds and I think that would extend to any pay raises that were pre-arranged as part of the initial contract or anything contractually agreed before the suspension. You could argue otherwise but the court costs of doing so can end up amounting to more than simply honouring the contracted pay agreements.

Whether or not they should have risked the financial hit in favour of optics is a different debate but you'll often find that when it comes to finances/legal stuff there's no real "decision maker" at the wheel it's all just arbitrary.

If they did an annual pay review this year and decided to give him a raise, that would be another matter. I just think it's hard to fully judge unless we know it's a merit-based decision to increase pay, or a previously agreed incremental pay increase.

[bots]

I thought he was suspended. IF so then the pay rise should have been suspended too.

I think they had another brain fart or they thought the charges would go away. Either way I see nothing other than incompetence by the BBC ,again.

No, he wasn't suspended, he ran off and checked himself into a mental health clinic, so he was on the sick. Thats what led to the .... "you are all picking on Huw and he has had a breakdown" bollocks

[GiRTh]

Are we saying the BBC took no action against Edwards and he was a normal employee. Thats even worse.

[user104658]

No, he wasn't suspended, he ran off and checked himself into a mental health clinic, so he was on the sick

Even worse then - refusing an agreed increase while the employee is off sick on mental health grounds... litigation lawyers would be ALL OVER that (had he not been legitimately charged later).

[GiRTh]

I'm not much on employment law. So even if an employee is off sick they cannot suspend them for any reason at all. I would have thought the charges were so serious that a failure to suspend him raises eyebrows to they polices.

That means an employee can go off sick and they are, effectively, untouchable as long as they are off sick

[Ammi]

No, he wasn't suspended, he ran off and checked himself into a mental health clinic, so he was on the sick. Thats what led to the .... "you are all picking on Huw and he has had a breakdown" bollocks

…yeah, that would make more sense than him receiving his hefty salary increase while he was suspended on serious allegations…

[user104658]

I'm not much on employment law. So even if an employee is off sick they cannot suspend them for any reason at all. I would have thought the charges were so serious that a failure to suspend him raises eyebrows to they polices.

That means an employee can go off sick and they effectively untouchable as long as they are off sick

The original stuff (about him communicating with a teenage boy) seemingly sort of went away and then he went off sick on mental health grounds (with various people claiming he'd been incorrectly targetted). The charges against him now (the paedophilic content found on his phone) are relatively new, and he has been suspended now that there are legitimate charges. When the pay increase was put through there were no active charges (as far as had been reported, I assume he was being quietly investigated and evidence gathered).

As far as I understand anyway. He was only properly charged a few weeks back.

[GiRTh]

The original stuff seemingly sort of went away and then he went off sick on mental health grounds (with various people claiming he'd been incorrectly targetted). The charges against him now are relatively new, and he has been suspended now that there are legitimate charges. When the pay increase was put through there were no active charges (as far as had been reported, I assume he was being quietly investigated and evidence gathered).

As far as I understand anyway. He was only properly charged a few weeks back.He was arrested in November and the BBC admit they knew about it.

It all smacks of a cover up and the BBC claiming they didnt have information that they could easily have requested from the MET.

[Ammi]

I'm not much on employment law. So even if an employee is off sick they cannot suspend them for any reason at all. I would have thought the charges were so serious that a failure to suspend him raises eyebrows to they polices.

That means an employee can go off sick and they effectively untouchable as long as they are off sick

…yep, especially as well and definitely with any ‘stress related’ struggles to prevent from being able to continue your roll at that time…/…that makes more sense now, as to why he was given the increase…obviously I’m not in agreement with it but it makes more sense…

[user104658]

He was arrested in November and the BBC admit they knew about it.

It all smacks of a cover up and the BBC claiming they didnt have information that they could easily have requested from the MET.

I'm pretty sure the arrest in November related to allegations that he'd been sending messages of a sexual nature back and forth with a teenager (which I think we can now guess is probably true) but nothing stuck there, and the recent arrest and charge is, technically, a totally separate charge.

They may well have started gathering evidence on these charges back then but they wouldn't have arrested and charged until they had a solid investigation/evidence... they pay rise thing happened somewhere in the middle of that, after the initial arrest but before these charges.

[GiRTh]

I'm pretty sure the arrest in November related to allegations that he'd been sending messages of a sexual nature back and forth with a teenager (which I think we can now guess is probably true) but nothing stuck there, and the recent arrest and charge is, technically, a totally separate charge.

They may well have started gathering evidence on these charges back then but they wouldn't have arrested and charged until they had a solid investigation/evidence... they pay rise thing happened somewhere in the middle of that, after the initial arrest but before these charges.Yep. They seem to be completely separate charges. It makes a bit more sense now as the investigators cannot go beyond the scope of their investigation.

Given that, the BBC still needs to explain their stance. Why they are trying to gaslight by claiming they knew nothing but they could have requested the evidence from the met and, due to the high profile nature of the case, they would have probably got the enough information to make a decision.

AS for Edward and his anger at the time of the first charges. I now have to laugh. WHen you're up to no good you cant get shiity with people when they find out but its surprising how often people do. Its poetic, the way he has fallen from grace

[Beso]

They payed him 250 grand after the conviction didnt they?

[bots]

The BBC really aren't accountable to the public at all, everything is agreed by "old boy" networks behind closed doors. We just pay for it

[user104658]

They payed him 250 grand after the conviction didnt they?

There hasn't been a conviction yet at all, he's not even in court until mid September. Though he's submitted a guilty plea so there will be a conviction.

[Beso]

There hasn't been a conviction yet at all, he's not even in court until mid September. Though he's submitted a guilty plea so there will be a conviction.

Ah, yes, that would make more sense.. so they've paid him 250 grand after the guilty plea if my source is correct.

[bots]

Ah, yes, that would make more sense.. so they've paid him 250 grand after the guilty plea if my source is correct.

he only pled guilty a couple of days ago, and i think he actually left the BBC 2 or 3 months ago, so he wasn't being paid anything from then

[user104658]

Ah, yes, that would make more sense.. so they've paid him 250 grand after the guilty plea if my source is correct.

he only pled guilty a couple of days ago, and i think he actually left the BBC 2 or 3 months ago, so he wasn't being paid anything from then

Based on his annual pay (roughly 400k I think?) I'd assume it's £250k since November, so since he was suspended. It'll be even more if you take the whole timeline into account... it was roughly this time a whole year ago the first allegations started coming out.

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-3974c4c1-07fe-402c-bf7b-b32f6b79afe0.png

[Cherie]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-3974c4c1-07fe-402c-bf7b-b32f6b79afe0.png

who would have thought a 60 year old male in a powerful position could exert power over a young addict, yet it was passed off in this thread as pretty normal stuff and the young lad was loving it really.....

[Crimson Dynamo]

still waiting why some members like liam and glen spent ages defending this paedo??

plenty stuff in this thread by you guys so can we get down to addressing it?

[Cherie]

And you’re working on the assumption that he’s automatically guilty of everything he’s been ‘accused’ of

Why is the wrong thing to focus on? He’s been wrongly accused of committing sex offences, he has every right to be angry, any person would be in that scenario

'

calls everyone on the forum gullible

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-91e3ddd1-9de5-47a5-8f30-2be202d93ed6.png

[Beso]

Bloody hell

He must have been dying on a bit of fluff to be so brazen in public


This story is wierd

[Mystic Mock]

They included seven category A images, the most serious classification - two of which showed a child aged between about seven and nine.

Category A images show serious abuse including penetrative sexual activity.

He also had 12 category B pictures, which involve non-penetrative sexual activity, and 22 photographs in category C, which covers other indecent images. The category B and C pictures showed children aged between 12 to 15.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c880zykre4lo

Sick ****er, can be no excuse.

BBC also knew he'd been arrested in November after which time he received £250k in salary

12 years old?:umm2:

[Mystic Mock]

he wasn't and stop peddling lies it could get you in serious trouble

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-was-donald-trump-found-guilty-rape-1799935

please read that fact checked link and desist from spreading fake news and defamation on Tibb

Mods can you delete his post?

He just sexually abused her instead.

[bots]

what we all need to know is who is in his friendship circle. Who else is involved, because he sure won't be alone

[Mystic Mock]

'

calls everyone on the forum gullible

Tbf to Liam, how was he suppose to know that Huw Edwards likes 7 year olds?

[Mystic Mock]

what we all need to know is who is in his friendship circle. Who else is involved, because he sure won't be alone

I agree with you.

Hopefully the Police will be investigating for any possibilities of a BBC grooming gang.

[Crimson Dynamo]

He just sexually abused her instead.

nope

[Mystic Mock]

nope

If you read the article that you linked up on here, it says that he got found guilty of sexually abusing and defaming Carroll.

Edit... Okay you're being really technical about it lol, he got found "liable" of sexually abusing and defaming Carroll.

[Cherie]

Tbf to Liam, how was he suppose to know that Huw Edwards likes 7 year olds?

He was very comfortable with a 60 year old man in a powerful position using a vulnerable 17 year old for his own gratification :shrug: in fact he said it wasn't true and was a plot to bring the BBC down

[arista]

From Early AM, Debate on Edwards on LBC


His Lawyers are going to say
he was mentally unstable etc.

One Expert said he could avoid Jail.

[Cherie]

From Early AM, Debate on Edwards on LBC


His Lawyers are going to say
he was mentally unstable etc.

One Expert said he could avoid Jail.

He better not, its an affront to people with genuine mental health issues

[arista]

He better not, its an affront to people with genuine mental health issues


Yes many will be shocked
his sneaky lawyers
making use of his extra £200,000

[Mystic Mock]

He was very comfortable with a 60 year old man in a powerful position using a vulnerable 17 year old for his own gratification :shrug: in fact he said it wasn't true and was a plot to bring the BBC down

1. I wouldn't compare being sexually attracted to a 17 year old as the same as being attracted to a 7 year old imo, it might be controversial to say (although I really don't think that it should be,) but being attracted to a 7 year old who obviously hasn't gone through puberty and is mentally very clearly a child, is beyond sick imo.

And 2. Liam was going with his opinion based on the information that was given at the time, like we all were tbf.

[Mystic Mock]

He better not, its an affront to people with genuine mental health issues

He wouldn't be the first Celebrity to trivialize Mental Health issues unfortunately.

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-2c3395f4-2a35-42b7-b0b2-74a09b37a499.png

[GoldHeart]

1. I wouldn't compare being sexually attracted to a 17 year old as the same as being attracted to a 7 year old imo, it might be controversial to say (although I really don't think that it should be,) but being attracted to a 7 year old who obviously hasn't gone through puberty and is mentally very clearly a child, is beyond sick imo.

And 2. Liam was going with his opinion based on the information that was given at the time, like we all were tbf.


Were some of his victims really as young as 7 !!??! Wtf
:umm2: grotesque .

And I agree a 17 year old is ZERO comparison to a 7 year old who hasn't even developed and still very much a child .


Edwards is a full on disgusting paedophile

[Mystic Mock]

Were some of his victims really as young as 7 !!??! Wtf
:umm2: grotesque .

And I agree a 17 year old is ZERO comparison to a 7 year old who hasn't even developed and still very much a child .


Edwards is a full on disgusting paedophile

Well one of the reports on here says that he had an image of a 7 year old on his Phone in a really inappropriate way.

And I agree with you 100% in this post.

[arista]

Well one of the reports on here says that he had an image of a 7 year old on his Phone in a really inappropriate way.

And I agree with you 100% in this post.


And his Hotel Laptop

[Mystic Mock]

And his Hotel Laptop

And this as well.

[arista]

The BBC has now asked
EX-Worker Edwards
to return £200K


Will the Dirty Git return it?

[Cherie]

The BBC has now asked
EX-Worker Edwards
to return £20,000


Will the Dirty Git return it?


do you mean 200K Arista?

He has a 300K pension he will be fine

[bots]

it is over 200k, but he will be under no legal obligation to return it, so i doubt he will

[user104658]

it is over 200k, but he will be under no legal obligation to return it, so i doubt he will

Needs it for his lawyers.

[arista]

do you mean 200K Arista?

He has a 300K pension he will be fine


Yes I will edit it.

Thanks

[bots]

Needs it for his lawyers.

exactly, pleading guilty in court will have cost him a few quid and arranging for photos to be supplied to him while he is in prison, wont come cheap

[arista]

it is over 200k, but he will be under no legal obligation to return it, so i doubt he will


They need that cash back,

It will make him look a little better
if he returns the needed cash

[arista]

Needs it for his lawyers.

He has other Cash for them

[bots]

They need that cash back,

It will make him look a little better
if he returns the needed cash

i don't think he cares about that

[user104658]

It will make him look a little better
if he returns the needed cash

It wouldn't make him look better if he sold everything he owns and gave every penny to charity and lived out his days as a pauper. He's not in trouble for financial stuff/fraud, he's in trouble for ogling child porn.

[arista]

i don't think he cares about that

Yes could be the case

[arista]

It wouldn't make him look better if he sold everything he owns and gave every penny to charity and lived out his days as a pauper. He's not in trouble for financial stuff/fraud, he's in trouble for ogling child porn.


Very True

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-5bc7f679-9938-4d63-bee3-df52a1233116.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-39c896d6-b51b-4d9c-89fb-f953558c8a63.jpeg

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-b5deb703-c479-4594-95e2-55f29af32c0e.jpeg

[joeysteele]

Had to smile last night when it was said on TV that Edwards had brought the BBC into disrepute.
As if that was unusual.

His detestable actions have indeed but it's more again than a rare occurrence.
After many others now have been able to do as to the BBC.

[Zizu]

His wife is gorgeous


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Prohttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20240810/e0995cfaedd64d3b700794281a7614c3.jpg

[bots]

the BBC are obviously only doing it because they have been shamed into it.

[arista]

Edwards now in Court

Who can say send it to Crown Court?

[arista]

SkyNewsHD reporting outside the court
we should hear
at lunchtime.

Likely to get a Community Order

[UserSince2005]

Lock him up, hes a bad man.
Not handing the money back as well should go against him when sentencing i think.

[arista]

Live Feed Outside the Court

From Reuters on X

https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1ynJODrwpYWxR

[arista]

His Lawyer claims
he is getting Therapy


SkyNewsHD in 20 mins or so
will find out his punishment

[bots]

trying to play the sympathy card wont work

[MTVN]

The guy who provided him the images only received a suspended sentence so unlikely to be any jail time for Huw

[arista]

Suspended Sentence 6months in Jail


If he returns to Child Porn

He will go straight to jail.


He has to do 25 Sessions

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/09/16/11/89726211-0-image-m-30_1726482494584.jpg

[arista]

[Huw Edwards sent hundreds of pounds
to a convicted paedophile after he sent
him pornographic images and replied
'yes xxx' after being asked if he wanted photos
of a child aged between 14 and 16,
a court heard today.

The disgraced BBC News anchor is being
sentenced to three charges of 'making' indecent
photographs of children after he was sent
41 images by paedophile Alex Williams
in vile WhatsApp messages.

Prosecutor Ian Hope said Edwards paid
the paedophile amounts 'in the low hundreds
on an occasional basis... apparently off the
back of sending pornographic photographs'
and that the total amounted to
between '£1,000 to £1,500'.]


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13854699/Huw-Edwards-sentencing-indecent-images-children.html

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/09/16/06/88031865-0-Alex_Williams_25_shared_indecent_images_with_Huw_E dwards_that_le-a-6_1726464505851.jpg

[Alex Williams, 25,
shared indecent images with Huw Edwards
that led to the newsreader's downfall.
Williams is pictured here as a teenager
on a family trip to a Welsh beauty spot]

[bots]

the likelihood is he will offend again quite quickly

[arista]

the likelihood is he will offend again quite quickly

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/09/16/09/89722473-13854699-image-m-60_1726474461539.jpg

[Crimson Dynamo]

the likelihood is he will offend again quite quickly

he probably already has

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/09/16/07/83964227-13854429-The_star_anchor_s_prestigious_career_involved_brea king_the_news_-a-29_1726468877695.jpg

May 2023

[arista]

Back in June 2023

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/09/16/06/87986817-0-Huw_Edwards_shaking_hands_with_Queen_Elizabeth_II_ during_a_royal-a-9_1726464535267.jpg

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/09/16/07/73119153-13854429-A_mocked_up_version_of_a_reported_Instagram_messag e_exchange_bet-a-32_1726469640711.jpg


You Dirty Bugger Edwards


[A mocked up version of a reported
Instagram message exchange between
Edwards and a teenager]

[arista]

He has left Court

Right To his Car

[bots]

if you look at other sex offenders, there are very few that don't go on to re-offend given the opportunity.

[arista]

He is now on the Sex offender List
for 7years.

[GoldHeart]

He is now on the Sex offender List
for 7years.

And I also imagine we won't be seeing him on TV any time soon .

[arista]

And I also imagine we won't be seeing him on TV any time soon .


Yes
that route has closed.


Now it is
can he stop going after
young boys?

[arista]

Poster on X

says

[Huw Edwards receives just a 6 month SUSPENDED sentence - no prison.

An utter disgrace and an affront to the child victims.

He played the mental health card, of course.

Westminster Magistrates should hang their heads in shame.]

[Beso]

Those ****ing muslims...20 months you racist pigs.

Those ****ing children..correct, they are..here have a get out of jail free card you poor poor paedo..



People applauding our justice system are thick as ****

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/09/16/07/83963653-13854429-Huw_Edwards_62_at_the_pinnacle_of_his_career_and_p icking_up_a_te-a-28_1726468874216.jpg

Getting his TV Award in 2023

[arista]

Just on BBCnewsHD
Category A
is Penatrative images of children.

That is what Dirty Edwards had

[bots]

Just on BBCnewsHD
Category A
is Penatrative images of children.

That is what Dirty Edwards had

it was 7 and 8 year old children, a whole new level of depravity

[Crimson Dynamo]

The same judge that released Huw Edwards back into the community because he didn’t think he posed a risk to children, jailed that guy for filming Chris Whitty, during covid

remember?

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXlook1WMAAqj8C?format=jpg&name=900x900

[Cherie]

The picture of Alex makes me think he has perhaps some kind of special needs?

No wonder his Mum and Dad were going ballistic

suspended sentence, did he not even get community service? travesty

[arista]

The picture of Alex makes me think he has perhaps some kind of special needs?

No wonder his Mum and Dad were going ballistic

suspended sentence, did he not even get community service? travesty



Yes, could well be.

[arista]

it was 7 and 8 year old children, a whole new level of depravity


Yes shocking
and evil.

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXlook1WMAAqj8C?format=jpg&name=900x900


Yes back July Last Year
Owen Jones got that all wrong

[Crimson Dynamo]

Huw Edwards will not receive a custodial sentence and is still entitled to a large BBC pension.

[arista]

Huw Edwards will not receive a custodial sentence and is still entitled to a large BBC pension.


Yet

We will see in time

[Gusto Brunt]

I was going to say he basically got off with it.

No, not basically.

He DID get off with it. He didn't get any punishment whatsoever. :mad:

[bots]

not exactly, by being on the sex offenders register he will be monitored, and if he does something again he will go straight to jail. He wasn't given a more lenient sentence than any other similar case

[arista]

not exactly, by being on the sex offenders register he will be monitored, and if he does something again he will go straight to jail. He wasn't given a more lenient sentence than any other similar case


Yes for 7 years.

I would have said for Life

[bots]

you can't give him 10 years in jail if no-one else who committed similar offences doesn't get jailed

[Crimson Dynamo]

you can't give him 10 years in jail if no-one else who committed similar offences doesn't get jailed

I do think his position in the UK should have counted against him but I get that the establishment are rammed full of paedos with his profile/predilections so he was never going to be punished

[bots]

I do think his position in the UK should have counted against him but I get that the establishment are rammed full of paedos with his profile/predilections so he was never going to be punished

look at the pope interfering in the US election, and he is king of the paedos, nobody raised an eyebrow

[Crimson Dynamo]

look at the pope interfering in the US election, and he is king of the paedos, nobody raised an eyebrow

true

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-9c4f5a95-8ff0-452c-b860-83629b467d05.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-2483464f-f5f2-451d-98c6-e2233f3828e1.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-864f515f-3e74-49ad-ba89-6d6bf3c89764.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-a21a6f07-81c6-4f51-98d6-b11e7b9bf28c.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-c8bcb704-adda-4d42-802a-a7326d1860b8.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-36dc3096-73f9-4098-a8b5-806b2b040b48.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-bf868a47-437a-42a3-aa19-276cba6453b4.png

[thesheriff443]

The picture of Alex makes me think he has perhaps some kind of special needs?

No wonder his Mum and Dad were going ballistic

suspended sentence, did he not even get community service? travesty

The guy in the picture is a convicted paedo taken when he was a teenager it’s not the guy that was sending pictures of himself

[Mystic Mock]

it was 7 and 8 year old children, a whole new level of depravity

Exactly.

[Mystic Mock]

Yes back July Last Year
Owen Jones got that all wrong

Tbf, how was Owen Jones supposed to know that Huw Edwards liked 7 year olds?

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GXq_RZKWEAEJQR3?format=jpg&name=small

[Cherie]

The guy in the picture is a convicted paedo taken when he was a teenager it’s not the guy that was sending pictures of himself

oh right cheers for that