Prince Harry is a Bully, African Charity Boss says

[arista]

BBC News Text:
[Dr Sophie Chandauka's claims about
Prince Harry also lead The Sunday Telegraph.
The broadsheet reports Dr Chandauka
has also told the Financial Times
that she was asked to publicly
defend Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex,
and that she had refused to
"become and extension of
the Sussex PR machine".]


https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/976/cpsprodpb/2573/live/2889e0c0-0cf9-11f0-b234-07dc7691c360.jpg.webp


https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/976/cpsprodpb/bb2e/live/9b7f6c00-0cf7-11f0-ba12-8d27eb561761.jpg.webp

[Mystic Mock]

Well the great Eric Cartman does say that "gingers have no souls."

And maybe he is right.:think:

[arista]

The Lady Boss and her legal Adviser
are now on SkyNewsHD

Trevor Phillips show

[Cherie]

What's the old saying, what goes round, comes round

[thesheriff443]

Well the great Eric Cartman does say that "gingers have no souls."

And maybe he is right.:think:

After anniek is finished with you
You will have no balls

[bots]

i don't believe this charity boss is a particularly trustworthy witness

[Cherie]

i don't believe this charity boss is a particularly trustworthy witness

It doesn't matter really, Harry and Megs were very happy to accuse people of all sorts, just heard some woman on LBC saying Harry would be very hurt by these accusations, like I say you reap what you sow

[thesheriff443]

If you can treat your own family as the enemy it’s hardly surprising how he will treat people he doesn’t know or give a fcuk about

[rusticgal]

It doesn't matter really, Harry and Megs were very happy to accuse people of all sorts, just heard some woman on LBC saying Harry would be very hurt by these accusations, like I say you reap what you sow


Exactly....getting a taste of their own medicine.

[user104658]

Well he was raised by bullies and his big brother is a known bully so yeah on balance I wouldn't be all that surprised if he has some bully-tendencies. Probably inevitable when you allow the "born-better" Royal narrative.

[Cherie]

Well he was raised by bullies and his big brother is a known bully so yeah on balance I wouldn't be all that surprised if he has some bully-tendencies. Probably inevitable when you allow the "born-better" Royal narrative.

Diana was a bully? who knew

[bots]

all the royals and high nobility use their position to coerce. They have always done it. Princess Di didn't become a champion for aids or land mines by being a meek and timid little girl like she portrayed for effect. She used her position and privilege to brow beat others into submission

[Livia]

Using the excuse that the royals are all bullies, so what chance did poor Harry have is a proper cop-out. Megan's not royal yet she's been accused of bullying. You get bullies in all stages if society. No one on here has the first idea of what the royals are really like. I do know this though, I've always found old money to be much nicer and more approachable than new money and the upper class far more grounded and unpretentious than the middle class.

[rusticgal]

I do know this though, I've always found old money to be much nicer and more approachable than new money and the upper class far more grounded and unpretentious than the middle class.


Thats sooo true....

[rusticgal]

I think if I remember correctly, the woman at the top in that photo was pushed to one side by Meghan for the photo...:laugh:

[thesheriff443]

all the royals and high nobility use their position to coerce. They have always done it. Princess Di didn't become a champion for aids or land mines by being a meek and timid little girl like she portrayed for effect. She used her position and privilege to brow beat others into submission

I disagre
Charities get royals and famous people on board to use their clout to get the charity exposure and investment

[user104658]

Diana was a bully? who knew

They were young when she died, a lot of this formative stuff comes in the teens. Also while she was evidently a gentler parent, I don't think Diana's noted as having done all that much to counter the "Special Boys" narrative, in fact I believe some of the quotes both spoken/written from her suggest the opposite. Diana was a Spencer and thus also "of the aristocracy", at the end of the day.

[rusticgal]

They were young when she died, a lot of this formative stuff comes in the teens. Also while she was evidently a gentler parent, I don't think Diana's noted as having done all that much to counter the "Special Boys" narrative, in fact I believe some of the quotes both spoken/written from her suggest the opposite. Diana was a Spencer and thus also "of the aristocracy", at the end of the day.


I think you are just generalising too much. Diana was a very compassionate person...its why she was called the Peoples Princess. People related to her for her compassion and natural behaviour...how she interacted with her children in front of the camera..she was just a natural and caring woman and they adored her. You never saw or witnessed or heard of any pomp or aristocratic behaviour from her.

[user104658]

I think you are just generalising too much. Diana was a very compassionate person...its why she was called the Peoples Princess. People related to her for her compassion and natural behaviour...how she interacted with her children in front of the camera..she was just a natural and caring woman and they adored her. You never saw or witnessed or heard of any pomp or aristocratic behaviour from her.

All I mean is that as part of the aristocracy (and even in her latter, more sceptical days, not someone who rebelled against the concept of aristocracy) she didn't counter the "Royal Idea" (which is at it's core, that some people are born special/have a special bloodline).

That's a heavily loaded idea and one that can't possibly have "no effect" on young people growing up in that environment, it's a superiority complex by definition, if there's nothing superior about "Royal Blood" then there is no Monarchy. Charles, William, Harry, et al. are all fundamentally raised with that belief system... it will have an effect, and one of those effects is likely to be a feeling of "automatic authority". That attitude - when encountered by anyone who isn't deferent and doesn't buy into the whole thing - is going to come off as "bullying".

[Maru]

It really takes very little to get labeled a bully these days so when I saw it I took it with a huge grain of salt. Everyone at this point knows the couple are PR crazy and are known to make stunts, so why would someone sign up to get on board with it if that is not what they are about? H&M can't keep staff either so apparently not easy to work with... (there are other things but yeah)

[Maru]

It doesn't matter really, Harry and Megs were very happy to accuse people of all sorts, just heard some woman on LBC saying Harry would be very hurt by these accusations, like I say you reap what you sow

Yes and my feeling, especially in recent years, is that celebrity in the US particularly has declined. Maybe even it has lost all meaning since professionalism has gone out the window. I would speculate, yeah, it is Hollywood dynamics at play there where people betray one another all to draft a headline.. and yes, reaping what one sows is true, but I think more literal than we may even think, as they worked and played the game to get where they are. This is the game they signed up to play. I suspect there is no authenticity here. From all parties.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/03/31/01/96732913-0-image-a-53_1743381817289.jpg


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-14552893/Prince-Harrys-royal-brand-RICHARD-KAY.html

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/976/cpsprodpb/aeee/live/af9e7cd0-0db0-11f0-b234-07dc7691c360.jpg.webp

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/976/cpsprodpb/4df1/live/f8589910-0dab-11f0-b234-07dc7691c360.jpg.webp

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/976/cpsprodpb/ce0d/live/d2b7e1b0-0dc5-11f0-ba12-8d27eb561761.jpg.webp

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/976/cpsprodpb/6f29/live/0d363370-0dab-11f0-b234-07dc7691c360.jpg.webp

[Maru]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/976/cpsprodpb/6f29/live/0d363370-0dab-11f0-b234-07dc7691c360.jpg.webp

What happens after we've tariffed everyone? (Oh, wrong thread)

[jet]

Harry himself very unwisely brought the whole furore to light by going to the press (The Times) trying to get Dr Chandauke to resign instead of addressing her and the charity directors upfront.
The same way he went to the press behind the backs of the Queen/the Royals in the half in/half out debacle, trying to force them to go along with his demands.
He didn’t expect Dr. Chandauke to hit back so hard with her own version of events. She wasn’t going to be afraid to speak up regarding his behaviour like so many members of the charity had been for a long time because he was ‘Prince Harry’.
Her Sky interview was very interesting indeed. Whatever the outcome, she’s a very impressive, very articulate woman.

[Mystic Mock]

After anniek is finished with you
You will have no balls

I do feel like my voice is higher pitched today.

[Cherie]

I do feel like my voice is higher pitched today.

:joker:

[jet]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14558071/prince-harry-boss-sentebale-charity-shuts-social-media-trolled.html

The Chair of Sentebale has shut down her social media after a pile-on led by the so-called Sussex Squad.
Dr Sophie Chandauka, who has accused Prince Harry of 'harassment', has deleted her Twitter account in the face of 'online bullying' including racism, MailOnline can reveal.
One troll, who uses #TeamSussex in their bio, called her a ‘house n****

[bots]

that doesn't mean anything jet, X is just a mess.

I've always said all charities are corrupt and they take advantage of those they are supposed to protect, so, quite frankly, i don't trust anyone associated with them

[AnnieK]

I do feel like my voice is higher pitched today.

That's the power of gingers for you.....be very aware :laugh:

[Beso]

Entitled bully..with daddy issues.

[Cherie]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14558071/prince-harry-boss-sentebale-charity-shuts-social-media-trolled.html

The Chair of Sentebale has shut down her social media after a pile-on led by the so-called Sussex Squad.
Dr Sophie Chandauka, who has accused Prince Harry of 'harassment', has deleted her Twitter account in the face of 'online bullying' including racism, MailOnline can reveal.
One troll, who uses #TeamSussex in their bio, called her a ‘house n****

Doesn't surprise me the Sussex squad are rabid, interesting that they are happy to use racial slurs, while crying about racism, no surprises though

[jet]

Doesn't surprise me the Sussex squad are rabid, interesting that they are happy to use racial slurs, while crying about racism, no surprises though

Yeah, no surprise at all, and it seems that H&MS so - called anti cyber bullying campaign doesn’t apply to their own rabid fans.
They have been at it for years, issuing death threats and bullying anyone who doesn’t blindly worship the Sussexes.

On Instagram, Meghan recently ‘expressed gratitude’ to her fans for their support - encouraging words indeed - and very much NOT anti - cyber bullying.

[Beso]

Some great points there jet..:clap1:

[rusticgal]

Well they are sinking fast....and all their own doing.

[Maru]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14558071/prince-harry-boss-sentebale-charity-shuts-social-media-trolled.html

The Chair of Sentebale has shut down her social media after a pile-on led by the so-called Sussex Squad.
Dr Sophie Chandauka, who has accused Prince Harry of 'harassment', has deleted her Twitter account in the face of 'online bullying' including racism, MailOnline can reveal.
One troll, who uses #TeamSussex in their bio, called her a ‘house n****

Are these Americans? Does anyone pay attention to it enough to know?

[Glenn.]

https://x.com/rvealingthenarc?s=21&t=jGjsPOhSduCbgISdXHWlrQ

https://x.com/lairdofthemanor?s=21&t=jGjsPOhSduCbgISdXHWlrQ

https://x.com/_genevieves_?s=21&t=jGjsPOhSduCbgISdXHWlrQ

https://x.com/unremarkleble?s=21&t=jGjsPOhSduCbgISdXHWlrQ

https://x.com/royal_tea_house?s=21&t=jGjsPOhSduCbgISdXHWlrQ

Just a handful of twitter profiles dedicated to spewing hatred against Meghan. We know there a more.

[Cherie]

https://x.com/rvealingthenarc?s=21&t=jGjsPOhSduCbgISdXHWlrQ

https://x.com/lairdofthemanor?s=21&t=jGjsPOhSduCbgISdXHWlrQ

https://x.com/_genevieves_?s=21&t=jGjsPOhSduCbgISdXHWlrQ

https://x.com/unremarkleble?s=21&t=jGjsPOhSduCbgISdXHWlrQ

https://x.com/royal_tea_house?s=21&t=jGjsPOhSduCbgISdXHWlrQ

Just a handful of twitter profiles dedicated to spewing hatred against Meghan. We know there a more.

What has any of that got to do with the thread? your opinion on Harrys alleged bullying of a black women would be most welcome

[Glenn.]

What has any of that got to do with the thread? your opinion on Harrys alleged bullying of a black women would be most welcome

Pointing out there’s wankers on each side

[Cherie]

Pointing out there’s wankers on each side

Most people knew this already

[jet]

Pointing out there’s wankers on each side

Yes there are indeed.
But threatening people’s lives and those of their children is very different.
Examples.
https://x.com/CamillaTominey/status/1407606208828223492

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14489451/michelin-star-chef-death-threats-rejecting-meghan-markle-netflix.html

And has Meghan had an X account that she had to shut down because people were DIRECTLY addressing her in abusive, racist language like they were to Dr. Chandauka?

[bots]

the bottom line is that the whole thing is unsavoury. There is a nasty smell from all involved

[Mystic Mock]

That's the power of gingers for you.....be very aware :laugh:

I need Eric to protect me.:bawling:

[Mystic Mock]

the bottom line is that the whole thing is unsavoury. There is a nasty smell from all involved

This.

[Beso]

You can take the man out of the Nazi uniform........etc etc.

[Maru]

*readded:

Prince Harry's charity breaks silence after Duke calls out 'blatant lies'
https://www.newsweek.com/prince-harry-sentebale-charity-commission-regulator-case-2054789

Prince Harry said a probe into the African charity he dramatically quit this month will "unveil the truth" about how relations on the board disintegrated.

The Charity Commission has opened a regulatory compliance case looking at governance issues at Sentebale.

Harry quit the organization last week, citing a dispute between its chair, Sophie Chandauka, and the trustees.

She then accused him of bullying and harassment and accused unnamed other figures of misogyny and misogynoir.

Prince Harry said the saga had been "heartbreaking" and added in a statement: "On behalf of the former trustees and patrons, we share in the relief that the Charity Commission confirmed they will be conducting a robust inquiry.

"We fully expect it will unveil the truth that collectively forced us to resign. We remain hopeful this will allow for the charity to be put in the right hands immediately, for the sake of the communities we serve."

Chandauka said in a statement: "I welcome the Charity Commission's decision to proceed with a regulatory compliance case to consider the various governance, administration and management matters I first reported in February 2025.

"For completeness, I should mention that we initiated an internal governance review last year, the findings of which we will share with the Charity Commission.

"We hope that, together, these actions will give the general public, our colleagues, partners, supporters, donors and the communities we serve comfort that Sentebale and its new Board of Trustees are acting appropriately to demonstrate and ensure good governance and a healthy culture for Sentebale to thrive."

Harry's words appear to hint at the possibility he still hopes to return to being a patron of the organization once the regulatory process has concluded.

Chandauka reported Sentebale to the Charity Commission, the charities regulator in England and Wales, and on March 5, she separately filed a lawsuit at the High Court.

A Charity Commission statement released to Newsweek and others read: "The regulator for charities in England and Wales has opened a regulatory compliance case to examine concerns raised about the charity Sentebale.

[jet]

The Telegraph

The Duke of Sussex allegedly sent an “unpleasant” and “imperious” message to the head of an African charity he founded after she refused to issue a statement defending his wife, the Telegraph can reveal.

Prince Harry directly contacted Dr Sophie Chandauka, the chairman of Sentebale, following an awkward exchange she had with the Duchess of Sussex at a charity polo match in Miami last April.
He initially asked his team to contact the Zimbabwean-born lawyer and request she issue a statement quashing any rumours of tension between her and the Duchess.

However, after she refused to be drawn into the row, Prince Harry fired a direct message to her allegedly demanding that she “explain herself”.
According to sources, the note was “unpleasant” in tone and used “imperious” language that left the charity boss feeling taken aback.

The Telegraph understands that her refusal to comply with the request to back Meghan contributed to the bitter dispute that this week saw the Duke resign as head of the HIV children’s charity he co-founded almost two decades ago.

Tensions between the charity’s chairman and its co-founder became apparent last April when Prince Harry captained the winning side at the Sentebale charity polo match in Miami.
The Duchess, who had not been expected to attend the event, turned up at short notice, accompanied by a camera crew from the couple’s Netflix documentary.
Serena Williams, the seven-time Wimbledon champion and a friend of the Duchess, was also present at the match.
According to one source, Meghan spent much of the afternoon chatting to Ms Williams, occasionally asking the organisers to bring her champagne.

But problems arose at the end of the match when the players and their partners gathered on the podium for a post-match photograph.
In an exchange captured on camera, Meghan appeared to instruct Dr Chandauka to move away from the Duke as he celebrated his win.

The Duchess was filmed asking Dr Chandauka to move to the other side of her husband, forcing the charity chairman to duck under the trophy to switch position.
The brief encounter generated huge publicity and, behind the scenes, the Sussexes were said to be furious at the way it had appeared.
The Telegraph understands that a member of Prince Harry’s team initially asked Dr Chandauka to issue a statement dismissing any suggestions of tension.
But Dr Chandauka, who felt she had been treated with disrespect during the charity day, refused, saying she did not wish to “become an extension of the Sussex PR machine”.
The Duke then contacted her directly to complain about her actions, with sources describing the message as “unpleasant”.
A spokesman for Sentebale confirmed the Duke had sent the message. “This is true. There is a document,” they said.
Sentebale was launched in 2006 after the Duke spent his gap year volunteering at an orphanage in Lesotho.

[Cherie]

*readded:

Prince Harry's charity breaks silence after Duke calls out 'blatant lies'
https://www.newsweek.com/prince-harry-sentebale-charity-commission-regulator-case-2054789

Pretty sure it was heartbreaking for his Grandma to put up with his **** as well while his Grandpa was on his deathbed . but here we are...you reap what you sow

[jet]

Harry directed a posh Eton friend, Alex Raynor, to speak to the Daily Mail (yes, the Daily Mail he despises!) on his behalf.
One of his comments to the Mail was:
‘It feels like [Dr Chandauka] had her nose put out of joint because she was not the most important woman of colour on the stage.'

A reader comment:
As a Black woman, I found his comments deeply offensive. A privileged white guy saying a Black woman is jealous cause she’s not the most important POC on stage, is pretty racist. If someone made that statement about Meghan, Harry would be up in arms.
If this is the type of stuff they think is acceptable to say about Dr. Chandauka in public, I can just imagine the things being said behind the scenes.
Don’t know why Harry thought allowing his friend to speak out was a good idea.

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-f2eb64e9-42d7-4f7d-ae4c-54dc646f7068.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-7aac87eb-5b5c-46ef-8977-d1d46ff58189.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-e1ed93a7-5f1a-47b9-a088-a96c9ec1950f.png

[Mystic Mock]

Harry directed a posh Eton friend, Alex Raynor, to speak to the Daily Mail (yes, the Daily Mail he despises!) on his behalf.
One of his comments to the Mail was:
‘It feels like [Dr Chandauka] had her nose put out of joint because she was not the most important woman of colour on the stage.'

A reader comment:
As a Black woman, I found his comments deeply offensive. A privileged white guy saying a Black woman is jealous cause she’s not the most important POC on stage, is pretty racist. If someone made that statement about Meghan, Harry would be up in arms.
If this is the type of stuff they think is acceptable to say about Dr. Chandauka in public, I can just imagine the things being said behind the scenes.
Don’t know why Harry thought allowing his friend to speak out was a good idea.

We're in a Little Brittain skit.:joker:

[Livia]

Harry bleating about being a victim again. If it wasn't for negative press they'd get no press at all. And that statement from his Eton buddy is wildly racist.

[bots]

in generations gone by, no member of the extended royal family would get themselves involved in a public argument. No-one wins, no-one looks good. If H & M were as switched on as they claim to be, they would have discovered this years ago and just shut up

[Beso]

Using more people, this time his friend.

What a low life scum bag.

[user104658]

Daily Mail readers desperately seeking answers: "But who am I supposed to dislike more? Prince Harry or black women?? An impossible choice!"

Especially complicated as one of the main reasons they dislike Harry is that he didn't marry white aristocracy.

A complex web.

[rusticgal]

Prince Harry distraught over 'untruths' about him. Now he knows how his family felt. As Cherie said before...what goes around..comes around.

[Cherie]

Prince Harry distraught over 'untruths' about him. Now he knows how his family felt. As Cherie said before...what goes around..comes around.

Couldn't have happened to a nicer person could it, its not nice to be publically accused of all sorts now is it, and recollections may vary :laugh:

[Cherie]

Daily Mail readers desperately seeking answers: "But who am I supposed to dislike more? Prince Harry or black women?? An impossible choice!"

Especially complicated as one of the main reasons they dislike Harry is that he didn't marry white aristocracy.

A complex web.

Nobody asked Harry to contact the DM .... he is such a hypocrite

[Maru]

https://media.giphy.com/media/3oEduZrNMxneSpW4gg/giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47141d4sfri5e67wr4ievbz64u3s6k jh1yqr0yhrq9&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

:laugh:

[Maru]

Using more people, this time his friend.

What a low life scum bag.

At this rate, he should just be hooked up to a polygraph everydayand publish the reports for our consumption on X each morning. It would save him lots of court paper and many trips to Staples.

I'm sure it's skeevy all the way around, but that's what he gets for hanging out with rats for living.

[Zizu]

Harry just donated £1.1 million to Children in Need !!

What an absolute bounder !

[emoji3]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Livia]

Donated money, immediately told the press.

[Zizu]

Donated money, immediately told the press.


You shameless cynic


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Glenn.]

Dammed if he does. Damned if he doesn’t.

Well done to him. I’m sure his donation will help a lot of children. Protect our kids etc etc

[Crimson Dynamo]

as I recall last year..

Rosie Millard has resigned as chair of Children in Need, she says, because of an ‘institutional failure’ that led to almost £500,000 being paid out to LGBT Youth Scotland (LGBTYS). Payments only stopped, Millard says, when she alerted Children in Need of the history of the charity it was funding. In 2009, James Rennie – chief executive of LGBTYS from 2003 to 2008 – was jailed for life after being revealed as part of one of Britain’s worst paedophile rings. LGBTYS received its first grant from Children in need 7 months after he was convicted.

:skull:

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-did-children-in-need-fund-a-charity-linked-to-a-paedophile-scandal/

[Cherie]

Donated money, immediately told the press.

You shameless cynic


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Press were already aware this was happening a Journalist alluded to something 'big' happening with regard to Harry this morning on one of the LBC shows, but she was sworn to secrecy, I am sure there are plenty childrens charities in the US that could have benefited, surely he doesn't want to ingratiate himself with the awful UK public

[thesheriff443]

No doubt it’s a tax relief and is part of the massive amount the late queen left him in her will

[Beso]

A nice gesture, but large doners that aren't a well known company usually prefer to remain incognito.


So I dont know, was it his donation from his personal wealth, or from his archwell foundation thing?

[Zizu]

A nice gesture, but large doners that aren't a well known company usually prefer to remain incognito.


So I dont know, was it his donation from his personal wealth, or from his archwell foundation thing?


They said it was from his personal account


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk