PDA

View Full Version : Australian Paedo Deported To Britain - Your Thoughts?


MarkWaldorf
21-03-2008, 07:44 PM
I opened a Newspaper today and found this story about Raymond Horne, the Australian Paedophile who's been dumped on us by Australia. I then read he's apparently "going to be living in London" which is even more frightening - god forbid he moves anywhere near me. No one deserves to live near him. :sad:

What are your opinions on this story?

Loukas
21-03-2008, 07:47 PM
I Think its stupid they should be locked up forever!

Spike
21-03-2008, 07:47 PM
He should be killed

MR.K!
21-03-2008, 07:50 PM
Originally posted by DoubleTrouble
I Think its stupid they should be locked up forever! ditto.. and they should tatoo 'PEEDO' on thier face

MarkWaldorf
21-03-2008, 07:53 PM
I find it shocking that he was 21 when he was first convicted of child sex offences.

Dan_
21-03-2008, 08:14 PM
Well the guy is a repeat sex offedender, so he shouldn't even be allowed out of prison.It's no use just having him on the sex offenders list as he's not even going to be tracked close enough to stop him committing further crimes.

Conor
21-03-2008, 08:20 PM
Sure its bad, but this is a pyscological problem, so I dont agree with branding or death sentences. He should seek help and be kept under supervision at a specially built home, not deported elsewhere so AU can forget about him.

Spike
21-03-2008, 08:24 PM
I would happily kill him, he deserves it. I think all of them should be killed in the most painful way possible.

Matt08
21-03-2008, 08:42 PM
Originally posted by MarkChap©
I opened a Newspaper today and found this story about Raymond Horne, the Australian Paedophile who's been dumped on us by Australia. I then read he's apparently "going to be living in London" which is even more frightening - god forbid he moves anywhere near me. No one deserves to live near him. :sad:

What are your opinions on this story?

He's not actually Australian, as he's never applied to become an Australian citizen. He left Britain at the age of 5 and is still a British citizen. That's the only reason the Australian government could deport him back.

Tom
21-03-2008, 09:09 PM
If we had an Australian citizen here who was a repeat sex offender then we would want him deporting. Thats all they have done so I don't think theres anything wrong with it. He, however, needs locking up forever.

MarkWaldorf
21-03-2008, 09:12 PM
Originally posted by Matt08
Originally posted by MarkChap©
I opened a Newspaper today and found this story about Raymond Horne, the Australian Paedophile who's been dumped on us by Australia. I then read he's apparently "going to be living in London" which is even more frightening - god forbid he moves anywhere near me. No one deserves to live near him. :sad:

What are your opinions on this story?

He's not actually Australian, as he's never applied to become an Australian citizen. He left Britain at the age of 5 and is still a British citizen. That's the only reason the Australian government could deport him back.

Well he's lived there for forty-so years, so naturally you'd call him Australian, even if he "technically" isn't.

Tom
21-03-2008, 09:19 PM
Originally posted by MarkChap©
Originally posted by Matt08
Originally posted by MarkChap©
I opened a Newspaper today and found this story about Raymond Horne, the Australian Paedophile who's been dumped on us by Australia. I then read he's apparently "going to be living in London" which is even more frightening - god forbid he moves anywhere near me. No one deserves to live near him. :sad:

What are your opinions on this story?

He's not actually Australian, as he's never applied to become an Australian citizen. He left Britain at the age of 5 and is still a British citizen. That's the only reason the Australian government could deport him back.

Well he's lived there for forty-so years, so naturally you'd call him Australian, even if he "technically" isn't.

But still, turn the tables. An Australian who is still an Australian citizen despite living here for 40+ years is a serial sex offender. Should he be sent home or kept in Britain?

Thats how I view it anyway.

XxThinkinBlinkinxX
23-03-2008, 08:17 PM
Originally posted by Matt08
He's not actually Australian, as he's never applied to become an Australian citizen. He left Britain at the age of 5 and is still a British citizen. That's the only reason the Australian government could deport him back.

It has worked in their favour, hasn't it. There problem has now been forced upon us due to a technicality in the law. Very sad indeed.

KKBL
23-03-2008, 08:36 PM
Originally posted by Spike
He should be killed

are you series?i know hes done something very very horrible and disgusting but he shouldnt be killed.no one should

12bigbrother12
01-04-2008, 06:46 AM
We can't really say it was wrong to dump him on the UK when the UK would happily dump an Australian born paedo on Australia

Sticks
01-04-2008, 06:54 AM
Rules of engagement were followed by both governments and law enforcement bodies.

This is how our system works

Get over it :nono:

Tom
01-04-2008, 05:36 PM
Originally posted by XxThinkinBlinkinxX
Originally posted by Matt08
He's not actually Australian, as he's never applied to become an Australian citizen. He left Britain at the age of 5 and is still a British citizen. That's the only reason the Australian government could deport him back.

It has worked in their favour, hasn't it. There problem has now been forced upon us due to a technicality in the law. Very sad indeed.

If it was the other way around, would you have the same feelings?

GiRTh
01-04-2008, 05:41 PM
Castrate him. Latest studies show that this 'disease' cannot be effectively treated so, it's inevitable that he will re-offend. Just image the fuss and uproar when he does.

Tom4784
07-04-2008, 04:43 PM
Originally posted by GiRTh
Castrate him. Latest studies show that this 'disease' cannot be effectively treated so, it's inevitable that he will re-offend. Just image the fuss and uproar when he does.

Girth's got a point, plus anyone who could do something that vile to a child deserves it.

Sticks
07-04-2008, 04:48 PM
But technically he has not offended in this jurisdiction

GiRTh
07-04-2008, 05:18 PM
Originally posted by Sticks
But technically he has not offended in this jurisdiction But he's a known offender. I dont see any point in waiting for the crime to happen.

Sticks
08-04-2008, 06:52 AM
Its how our judicial system works though

We are not in Tom Cruises Minority Report yet

Ruth
08-04-2008, 10:21 AM
Originally posted by MarkChap©
Originally posted by Matt08
Originally posted by MarkChap©
I opened a Newspaper today and found this story about Raymond Horne, the Australian Paedophile who's been dumped on us by Australia. I then read he's apparently "going to be living in London" which is even more frightening - god forbid he moves anywhere near me. No one deserves to live near him. :sad:

What are your opinions on this story?

He's not actually Australian, as he's never applied to become an Australian citizen. He left Britain at the age of 5 and is still a British citizen. That's the only reason the Australian government could deport him back.

Well he's lived there for forty-so years, so naturally you'd call him Australian, even if he "technically" isn't.

That's not the point. He is a British citizen, which is why he is here. I can understand why he has been brought here, and if it was an Australian national who had lived here for 40 years, we would probably do the same thing.

He shouldn't be out of prison though - ever. While I cannot condone a justice system that encourages violent or death as punishment, I do believe that this man will always be a danger, and therefore should always be locked up.

Retroman
08-04-2008, 12:44 PM
I can't understand how being a British citizen lead them to think that moving him back over here, somehow solves the problem...

Australia were just happy to get rid of him by any means possible.
But as for us/the UK, im not sure what we were thinking there.

I also wouldn't be surprised if when he does re-offend, he suddenly becomes one of the many paedophiles convicted that we don't hear about..and it's all kept rather quiet.

Slezer
24-06-2008, 06:11 PM
Originally posted by KKBL
Originally posted by Spike
He should be killed

are you series?i know hes done something very very horrible and disgusting but he shouldnt be killed.no one should

I think thats probably pretty easy to say when it isnt a family member of yours thats been molestered by some dirty c##t.

Hang him, shoot him, drown him. He has sexual tendencies towards young girls and therefore the only way to minimalise another person being molestered is to dispose of his body.

bigbr0ther
11-07-2008, 12:09 PM
What he did was wrong, but that was years ago and people can change. If he said he won't molest anymore we should give him a chance to show us that he's being honest.

Billy
11-07-2008, 12:10 PM
Originally posted by bigbr0ther
What he did was wrong, but that was years ago and people can change. If he said he won't molest anymore we should give him a chance to show us that he's being honest.

Should we ****.
How should we put children at risk just because he says he's going to change?

MarkWaldorf
11-07-2008, 12:14 PM
Originally posted by bigbr0ther
What he did was wrong, but that was years ago and people can change. If he said he won't molest anymore we should give him a chance to show us that he's being honest.

Oh of course.
We should let him live and work with with children because he claims he will never molest one again.
Oh **** off. Thats ridiculous.

bigbr0ther
12-07-2008, 10:51 AM
1) Personal attacks are against the rules. Thanks. :)
2) I'm not saying we should send kids over to his house to be alone with him. I'm just saying give him another chance. As long as he's not alone with kids, not much he can really do anyway, and he wouldn't be alone with a kid after what he's been accused of, even if it were innocent.

Fom
13-07-2008, 09:42 PM
Funny, british criminals used to be deported to Australia... seems like the tables have turned.

SamR
13-07-2008, 09:43 PM
very stupid idea