View Full Version : What if the house pictures were fakes??
John.
27-05-2008, 09:35 PM
what if the house pictures had been taken months ago, so as too lead us onto a false trail, and the house was totally different??
I don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture changes.
And by fakes i mean properly taken and then the house changed so that it is not the same now!!:wink:
MR.K!
27-05-2008, 09:37 PM
well unless they somehow faked the aerial pics too.. then...
JOSHUAH!
27-05-2008, 09:37 PM
I doubt it. But if they were, I'd be mad!
*mazedsalv**
27-05-2008, 09:37 PM
I doubt it. It looks real to me.
John.
27-05-2008, 09:38 PM
Originally posted by KRA!G
well unless they somehow faked the aerial pics too.. then...
no i don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture
Cody™
27-05-2008, 09:40 PM
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
MR.K!
27-05-2008, 09:40 PM
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by KRA!G
well unless they somehow faked the aerial pics too.. then...
no i don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture what'd be the point in that ?
John.
27-05-2008, 09:41 PM
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
Cody™
27-05-2008, 09:43 PM
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
John.
27-05-2008, 09:44 PM
Originally posted by KRA!G
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by KRA!G
well unless they somehow faked the aerial pics too.. then...
no i don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture what'd be the point in that ?
too fool us all, and give nothing away for this summer!!
it's like they're leavin a false trail.
EDIT: *leaving
Conor
27-05-2008, 09:45 PM
Well I'd be extremely happy if the photos were fake. This is one of the worst houses yet! :sad:
Wasting money for the sake of a few decoration choices? It would have no impact and no speculation value.
They strategically do things like 8 beds and 8 chairs to try and fool us, not invite 60 Minute Makeover in and blow a few thousand to fool us.
John.
27-05-2008, 09:47 PM
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
Conor
27-05-2008, 09:49 PM
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
It's not stupid wasting thousands of pounds to fool about at the max 5000 people in the UK :whistle:
John.
27-05-2008, 09:50 PM
Originally posted by Conor
Well I'd be extremely happy if the photos were fake. This is one of the worst houses yet! :sad:
thank you Conor :wink:
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word
http://www.askoxford.com/results/?view=dict&freesearch=stupider&branch=13842570&textsearchtype=exact
Cody™
27-05-2008, 09:52 PM
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.
Cody™
27-05-2008, 09:54 PM
Originally posted by Tom
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word
http://www.askoxford.com/results/?view=dict&freesearch=stupider&branch=13842570&textsearchtype=exact
HAHA thanks Tom.
John.
27-05-2008, 09:55 PM
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Cody™
27-05-2008, 09:56 PM
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?
John.
27-05-2008, 09:57 PM
Originally posted by Tom
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word
http://www.askoxford.com/results/?view=dict&freesearch=stupider&branch=13842570&textsearchtype=exact
well it's not a proper word: it's like jamp.
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
They usually put up camouflage nets. If they would have done that again there would have been no aerial pictures.
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Tom
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word
http://www.askoxford.com/results/?view=dict&freesearch=stupider&branch=13842570&textsearchtype=exact
well it's not a proper word: it's like jamp.
You can't argue with the Oxford dictionary. They are the people who decide what is a word and what isn't. It clearly has stupider listed under adjectives, therefore it is a word.
John.
27-05-2008, 09:58 PM
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?
who builds houses? who designs them?
John.
27-05-2008, 09:59 PM
Originally posted by Tom
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Tom
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word
http://www.askoxford.com/results/?view=dict&freesearch=stupider&branch=13842570&textsearchtype=exact
well it's not a proper word: it's like jamp.
You can't argue with the Oxford dictionary. They are the people who decide what is a word and what isn't. It clearly has stupider listed under adjectives, therefore it is a word.
well now i feel 'stupider' than Cody but its still a stupid word:
Cody™
27-05-2008, 10:02 PM
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?
who builds houses? who designs them?
Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh.
Cody™
27-05-2008, 10:03 PM
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Tom
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Tom
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.
PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word
http://www.askoxford.com/results/?view=dict&freesearch=stupider&branch=13842570&textsearchtype=exact
well it's not a proper word: it's like jamp.
You can't argue with the Oxford dictionary. They are the people who decide what is a word and what isn't. It clearly has stupider listed under adjectives, therefore it is a word.
well now i feel 'stupider' than Cody but its still a stupid word:
I wouldnt dispute that.
Sam1994
27-05-2008, 10:05 PM
So what you are basically saying is, that they've spent thousands of pounds on building a house, took about 15 pictures, then took everything away and built a new house? What gain do these people get from this? All they're basically doing is losing thousands of pounds. That is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard.
John.
27-05-2008, 10:05 PM
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star. [/quote]
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures? [/quote]
who builds houses? who designs them? [/quote]
Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]
well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes??
xDramatick
27-05-2008, 10:06 PM
Ridiculous.
Cody™
27-05-2008, 10:07 PM
Originally posted by jad22247
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures? [/quote]
who builds houses? who designs them? [/quote]
Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]
well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]
I think you know the answer to that question now.
John.
27-05-2008, 10:07 PM
Originally posted by Sam1994
So what you are basically saying is, that they've spent thousands of pounds on building a house, took about 15 pictures, then took everything away and built a new house? What gain do these people get from this? All they're basically doing is losing thousands of pounds. That is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard.
no what i'm saying is they've
1. built the house,
2. decorated it
3. taken pictures
4. redecorated it
all in order too fool us. who knows what big brohter is up to.
plus they would spent thousands if they wanted this series to be successful!!
Cody™
27-05-2008, 10:09 PM
Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.
John.
27-05-2008, 10:10 PM
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?
who builds houses? who designs them? [/quote]
Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]
well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]
I think you know the answer to that question now. [/quote]
i'm not giving this up!!! they could quite easily have redecorated the place since these pictures were taken!!
therefore that would make these pictures out-of-date, thus meaning they are not true, thus meaning they are FAKE!!!
:tongue:
Iv had thought about fake pics being taken but they wouldnt go tru all the trouble
Sam1994
27-05-2008, 10:11 PM
Oh, I thought it was the stupidest idea. Now I just think it's stupid.
Also about the money thing, they don't need that much to make the series a success, it's the housemates and their interactions that count for the most. :bouncy:
John.
27-05-2008, 10:12 PM
Originally posted by Cody™
Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.
who knows, it could have gone white, that might make a difference.
or green, or orange, you never know with Big Brother
John.
27-05-2008, 10:13 PM
Originally posted by Sam1994
Oh, I thought it was the stupidest idea. Now I just think it's stupid.
Also about the money thing, they don't need that much to make the series a success, it's the housemates and their interactions that count for the most. :bouncy:
nut you need to give the housemates a good place to interact in. and if C4 want to make BB9 a success they will spend the money.!!
!!this thread is about the possibility of fakes house pictures, not the interactions of housemates.!!
Sam1994
27-05-2008, 10:13 PM
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.
who knows, it could have gone white, that might make a difference.
or green, or orange, you never know with Big Brother
So, a housemate goes into a room sees a white wall and says "Oh no, a white wall, I need to leave now"
Cody™
27-05-2008, 10:13 PM
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?
who builds houses? who designs them?
Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]
well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]
I think you know the answer to that question now. [/quote]
i'm not giving this up!!! they could quite easily have redecorated the place since these pictures were taken!!
therefore that would make these pictures out-of-date, thus meaning they are not true, thus meaning they are FAKE!!!
:tongue: [/quote]
Well you keep believing that then. Just dont hold your breath on launch cos you will be disappointed.
The house will probably be slightly different to what we see next Thursday anyway, it always is.
Sam1994
27-05-2008, 10:15 PM
Originally posted by Tom
The house will probably be slightly different to what we see next Thursday anyway, it always is.
Yes, I would agree with that.
But I doubt they would re-decorate the whole place
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?
who builds houses? who designs them?
Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]
well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]
I think you know the answer to that question now. [/quote]
i'm not giving this up!!! they could quite easily have redecorated the place since these pictures were taken!!
therefore that would make these pictures out-of-date, thus meaning they are not true, thus meaning they are FAKE!!!
:tongue: [/quote]
I think they would do this only as a teaser the the papers a few months before the show starts
Cody™
27-05-2008, 10:16 PM
Originally posted by Tom
The house will probably be slightly different to what we see next Thursday anyway, it always is.
Yea. They should have more furniture. Im expecting a larger sofa for the lounge area.
John.
27-05-2008, 10:16 PM
Originally posted by Sam1994
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.
who knows, it could have gone white, that might make a difference.
or green, or orange, you never know with Big Brother
So, a housemate goes into a room sees a white wall and says "Oh no, a white wall, I need to leave now"
what if absolutly everything was black and white apart from the button to the diary room. no colour would drive a person mad.
John.
27-05-2008, 10:17 PM
Originally posted by Sam1994
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.
who knows, it could have gone white, that might make a difference.
or green, or orange, you never know with Big Brother
So, a housemate goes into a room sees a white wall and says "Oh no, a white wall, I need to leave now"
what if absolutly everything was black and white apart from the button to the diary room. no colour would drive a person mad.
John.
27-05-2008, 10:17 PM
Originally posted by Sam1994
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.
who knows, it could have gone white, that might make a difference.
or green, or orange, you never know with Big Brother
So, a housemate goes into a room sees a white wall and says "Oh no, a white wall, I need to leave now"
what if absolutly everything was black and white apart from the button to the diary room. no colour would drive a person mad.
Sam1994
27-05-2008, 10:19 PM
I would love to live in a black and white house! That would be so cool!
I feel more comfortable in the dark :dance2:
John.
27-05-2008, 10:20 PM
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?
who builds houses? who designs them?
Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh.
well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]
I think you know the answer to that question now. [/quote]
i'm not giving this up!!! they could quite easily have redecorated the place since these pictures were taken!!
therefore that would make these pictures out-of-date, thus meaning they may not be true, thus meaning they could be FAKE!!!
:tongue: [/quote]
Well you keep believing that then. Just dont hold your breath on launch cos you will be disappointed. [/quote]
i can't hold my breath for 9 days!!
John.
27-05-2008, 10:22 PM
Originally posted by Sam1994
I would love to live in a black and white house! That would be so cool!
I feel more comfortable in the dark :dance2:
the only colour would be the sky.
the grass would be grey.
everything black and white for 3months, i dont think so
Sam1994
27-05-2008, 10:22 PM
Just hold your breath from about a minute before the launch to the start of the tour :D :wink:
Sam1994
27-05-2008, 10:24 PM
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Sam1994
I would love to live in a black and white house! That would be so cool!
I feel more comfortable in the dark :dance2:
the only colour would be the sky.
the grass would be grey.
everything black and white for 3months, i dont think so
So what clothes would people be wearing? Prison uniforms? Grey grass? Would you get that at B & Q or Homebase or something?
John.
27-05-2008, 10:26 PM
Originally posted by Sam1994
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Sam1994
I would love to live in a black and white house! That would be so cool!
I feel more comfortable in the dark :dance2:
the only colour would be the sky.
the grass would be grey.
everything black and white for 3months, i dont think so
So what clothes would people be wearing? Prison uniforms? Grey grass? Would you get that at B & Q or Homebase or something?
grey astroturf. white jeans, trousers, t'shirts. there are things called clothes shops which sell varieties of white clothing!!
Cody™
27-05-2008, 10:30 PM
You try you weird experiments on yourself and leave some colour in the Big Bro house.
John.
27-05-2008, 10:33 PM
Originally posted by Cody™
You try you weird experiments on yourself and leave some colour in the Big Bro house.
i thought big brother was the one who was supposed to try the experiments!
they seem to have been stuck in a rut for the past three years!!
Cody™
27-05-2008, 10:38 PM
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
You try you weird experiments on yourself and leave some colour in the Big Bro house.
i thought big brother was the one who was supposed to try the experiments!
they seem to have been stuck in a rut for the past three years!!
And you think painting the house black and white will solve the problem? Nice logic.
John.
27-05-2008, 10:41 PM
Originally posted by Cody™
Originally posted by jad22247
Originally posted by Cody™
You try you weird experiments on yourself and leave some colour in the Big Bro house.
i thought big brother was the one who was supposed to try the experiments!
they seem to have been stuck in a rut for the past three years!!
And you think painting the house black and white will solve the problem? Nice logic.
no they should just try new things. not nessasarily the black and white idea!!
pete_bennet
28-05-2008, 09:34 AM
they have did it in previous years
DiamondDogTags
28-05-2008, 10:13 AM
It would be okay if they changed that bedroom, that is pretty awful.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.