Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

BB9 Big Brother 9 in 2008 was won by Rachel Rice.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 27-05-2008, 09:35 PM #1
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
Default What if the house pictures were fakes??

what if the house pictures had been taken months ago, so as too lead us onto a false trail, and the house was totally different??

I don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture changes.

And by fakes i mean properly taken and then the house changed so that it is not the same now!!
John. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:37 PM #2
MR.K!'s Avatar
MR.K! MR.K! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In my happy place
Posts: 6,107
MR.K! MR.K! is offline
Senior Member
MR.K!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In my happy place
Posts: 6,107
Default

well unless they somehow faked the aerial pics too.. then...
MR.K! is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:37 PM #3
JOSHUAH!'s Avatar
JOSHUAH! JOSHUAH! is offline
:')
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,155

Favourites:
X Factor 2009: Stacey Solomon
Strictly 2009: Jade & Ian


JOSHUAH! JOSHUAH! is offline
:')
JOSHUAH!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,155

Favourites:
X Factor 2009: Stacey Solomon
Strictly 2009: Jade & Ian


Default

I doubt it. But if they were, I'd be mad!
JOSHUAH! is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:37 PM #4
*mazedsalv** *mazedsalv** is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 28,015

Favourites (more):
BB2024: Khaled
CBB2024: Louis Walsh


*mazedsalv** *mazedsalv** is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 28,015

Favourites (more):
BB2024: Khaled
CBB2024: Louis Walsh


Default

I doubt it. It looks real to me.
*mazedsalv** is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:38 PM #5
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by KRA!G
well unless they somehow faked the aerial pics too.. then...
no i don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture
John. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:40 PM #6
Cody™'s Avatar
Cody™ Cody™ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,776


Cody™ Cody™ is offline
Senior Member
Cody™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,776


Default

Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
Cody™ is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:40 PM #7
MR.K!'s Avatar
MR.K! MR.K! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In my happy place
Posts: 6,107
MR.K! MR.K! is offline
Senior Member
MR.K!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In my happy place
Posts: 6,107
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by KRA!G
well unless they somehow faked the aerial pics too.. then...
no i don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture
what'd be the point in that ?
MR.K! is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:41 PM #8
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
John. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:43 PM #9
Cody™'s Avatar
Cody™ Cody™ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,776


Cody™ Cody™ is offline
Senior Member
Cody™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,776


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
Cody™ is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:44 PM #10
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by KRA!G
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by KRA!G
well unless they somehow faked the aerial pics too.. then...
no i don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture
what'd be the point in that ?
too fool us all, and give nothing away for this summer!!


it's like they're leavin a false trail.

EDIT: *leaving
John. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:45 PM #11
Conor's Avatar
Conor Conor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Belfast
Posts: 5,427


Conor Conor is offline
Senior Member
Conor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Belfast
Posts: 5,427


Default

Well I'd be extremely happy if the photos were fake. This is one of the worst houses yet!
Conor is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:46 PM #12
Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Default

Wasting money for the sake of a few decoration choices? It would have no impact and no speculation value.

They strategically do things like 8 beds and 8 chairs to try and fool us, not invite 60 Minute Makeover in and blow a few thousand to fool us.
Tom is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:47 PM #13
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
John. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:49 PM #14
Conor's Avatar
Conor Conor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Belfast
Posts: 5,427


Conor Conor is offline
Senior Member
Conor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Belfast
Posts: 5,427


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
It's not stupid wasting thousands of pounds to fool about at the max 5000 people in the UK
Conor is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:50 PM #15
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Conor
Well I'd be extremely happy if the photos were fake. This is one of the worst houses yet!

thank you Conor
John. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:51 PM #16
Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word

http://www.askoxford.com/results/?vi...archtype=exact
Tom is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:52 PM #17
Cody™'s Avatar
Cody™ Cody™ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,776


Cody™ Cody™ is offline
Senior Member
Cody™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,776


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.
Cody™ is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:54 PM #18
Cody™'s Avatar
Cody™ Cody™ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,776


Cody™ Cody™ is offline
Senior Member
Cody™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,776


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Tom
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word

http://www.askoxford.com/results/?vi...archtype=exact
HAHA thanks Tom.
Cody™ is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:55 PM #19
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
John. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:56 PM #20
Cody™'s Avatar
Cody™ Cody™ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,776


Cody™ Cody™ is offline
Senior Member
Cody™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,776


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?
Cody™ is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:57 PM #21
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Tom
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word

http://www.askoxford.com/results/?vi...archtype=exact
well it's not a proper word: it's like jamp.
John. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:57 PM #22
Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
They usually put up camouflage nets. If they would have done that again there would have been no aerial pictures.
Tom is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:58 PM #23
Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Tom
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word

http://www.askoxford.com/results/?vi...archtype=exact
well it's not a proper word: it's like jamp.
You can't argue with the Oxford dictionary. They are the people who decide what is a word and what isn't. It clearly has stupider listed under adjectives, therefore it is a word.
Tom is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:58 PM #24
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?
who builds houses? who designs them?
John. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 27-05-2008, 09:59 PM #25
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
John. John. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,780
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Tom
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Tom
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:
Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:
Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word

http://www.askoxford.com/results/?vi...archtype=exact
well it's not a proper word: it's like jamp.
You can't argue with the Oxford dictionary. They are the people who decide what is a word and what isn't. It clearly has stupider listed under adjectives, therefore it is a word.
well now i feel 'stupider' than Cody but its still a stupid word:
John. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
fakes, house, pictures


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts