View Full Version : Isn't 'vote to save' so much better?
Killian
07-06-2008, 11:07 PM
Personally, I think that a vote to save rather than to evict this series would be so much better. It would get rid of the dull characters early on.
thisisme2008
07-06-2008, 11:07 PM
yeah i think it should start that way this year. some of the awful and boring and forgotten ones would go.
Kate..
07-06-2008, 11:07 PM
Yeah i love vote to save!
Yeah that way the entertaining ones would stay and the boring ones would go.
Indierock&roll
07-06-2008, 11:08 PM
yes!!
that way it keeps the more entertaining ones in because all the good ones end up going even if you hate them its more entertaining to keep them in
Jack_
07-06-2008, 11:09 PM
Yeah, it is. :bigsmile:
Like you said it would get boring housemates out quicker.
I'm not sure if they're going to introduce it this year though, we'll just have to see.
Spike
07-06-2008, 11:12 PM
I want vote to save
If they pass the task and vote to save is used a boring housemate will be out
but if it is vote to evict is used a entertaining housemate will be out, probably Alex or Sylvia
dylissimo
07-06-2008, 11:12 PM
Definitely!
The public always get rid of the people that actually make the show interesting!
I hope this happens!
JeanP!
08-06-2008, 01:32 AM
I'd prefer a vote to save and a vote to evict, like BBAU
CassetteFinger
08-06-2008, 02:12 AM
Yeah, with a 'vote to save' alot of the bigger character's will stay like Alex, Kat, Sylvia, Dennis.....etc.
dotcom
08-06-2008, 07:02 AM
this would be great coz the boring hms like: mohamed, darnell, luke, rex and michael could leave in the first six weeks or so. vote to evict gets rid of the bigger characters.
Yeah, I think the voting is stupid. IT should be vote to stay so that people don't vote out good characters .
xDramatick
08-06-2008, 09:21 AM
I think it should be.
I could vote for Dennis then and not let the vultures get him ;D
CallumJoshuaSturt
08-06-2008, 09:42 AM
LIKE: Luke, Rex, Mohamed, Darnell, Stephanie
OK: Lisa, Mario, Rachel, Sylvia
Dislike: Dale, KATHREYA, Rebecca, Dennis, Jennifer, Alexandre and micheal
Bells
08-06-2008, 09:43 AM
It's miles better! Big characters tend to form split views - people who love them, but then those who can't stand them really can't stand them! As a result, with vote to evict, it's far more likely that people will bother to pick up their phones to vote for their eviction. And we're left with them gone, and a less entertaining house. Voting to save would counteract this problem, because fanbases of bigger BB personalities would vote to save them.
Michael will go much earlier if its a vote to save.
marctierman
08-06-2008, 10:48 AM
jeez these are repetitive posts
they do sometimes do vote to save don't they?
_Seth
08-06-2008, 10:49 AM
Very true point!
Can't really say much more than that, lol.
dylissimo
08-06-2008, 10:50 AM
No never.
marctierman
08-06-2008, 10:51 AM
oh fair dues lmao
weel they shoul alternate then (:
Robyn.
08-06-2008, 10:53 AM
I think they have used it once?
But yeah I would prefer vote to save.
stephanieisstunning
08-06-2008, 11:10 AM
NO.
stonedape
08-06-2008, 11:28 AM
they should've switched to vote to save ages ago...and if they do this year, it will help the series. It did wonders for BBAU, that's for sure.
Arneldo
08-06-2008, 11:36 AM
I would like to see it, but vote to save doesnt necesarly mean the best characters will stay. In CBB3 they had a vote to save, and it really didnt help the show IMO they same people would have gone had it been a vote to evict.
The only way a save votes works is if you have t least three nominees. If you have just two, then it a backwards evict vote. For example if BB8's Charley & Tracey were up against each other in a save vote, then all the Charley haters would just vote to save Tracey and Charley would be evicted.
stonedape
08-06-2008, 11:41 AM
Not necessarily. Even if it's two, if it's a close matchup (not tracey and charley) it could make all the difference and keep in the more interesting one.
Arneldo
08-06-2008, 11:49 AM
Originally posted by stonedape
Not necessarily. Even if it's two, if it's a close matchup (not tracey and charley) it could make all the difference and keep in the more interesting one.
Well it could be close if it was a evict vote, and if both the characters were well liked, or equally hated. However, Charley was a big charcter, and Tracey was not. However, Charley still would have gone in a save vote because Charley haters could vote to save Tracey. With two nominees, a save vote is just a backwards evict vote.
rayheartbliss
08-06-2008, 12:04 PM
i think they could do that as one of their twist
but voting 2 evict is better as there will be ppl in the house who will need to get out!!!!!
caugh* alexandra*
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.