Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
(Post 3098638)
You ought to let go on your own straws then.
Common sense doesn't always stand for proof, and in the case of this its not in your favour anyway. 'If it looks like a duck, then its a duck' springs to mind
Is your experience taking the drug or attempting to use it as plant feed? You've denied taking it, and I doubt you've made any attempt to use it on plants
Industry knowledge is always refutable.
What pharmacological facts?
Do you have any black and white proof?
|
My experience is seeing others use it, as well as knowing people who work in head shops and who deal in research chemicals.
I have already given you pharmacological facts. The drug is classed as a stimulant of the human central nervous system. It's synthesis involves adding 4-methylpropiophenone to bromine, a lot of tinkering I won't bore you with, and adding methylamine hydrochloride and triethylamine. From the ground up it's synthesis is intended to produce a drug of the phenethylamine, amphetamine, and cathinone variety.
It is a drug that targets the brains neurotransmitter Dopmine. That's what it was designed for. Plants don't have dopamine receptors or neurotransmitters, or any possible faculty that Mephedrone could attack in order to stimulate it's growth.
In addition, Mephedrone is not contained in any true plant product. Mephedrone is not sold in any legit gardening store. A search for Mephedrone on Google delivers 1,200,000 results. None discussing it's virtues as plant feeder. If it's discussed on a forum, it's a drug forum. Not a gardening forum. Wikipedia mentions nothing of it ever being used as a plant growth accelerant. Nor does Drugs Forum. Nor does Erowid. Nor does any other trusted drug website.
In addition, it's simply not up to me to prove a negative. It's like me asking you for proof that chopping up a carrot, feeding it to your dog, collecting the
shit and smearing it on your face
won't prevent lung cancer. If the onus is anyone to deliver proof, it's you.
So far, as accomodating as I have been with my arguments, you have not returned the favour. Your only source is watching a nameless news broadcast. The same news channel that was misguided just like you were as to the correct application of Mephedrone. It would be far from the first time a news channel has gotten the wrong end of the stick with relation to legal highs.
Mephedrone is a young chemical, synthesized by cladestine chemists with the sole purpose of getting you high. If it were to be used as plant food primarily, with the additional possible benefit of being able to use it as a psychotropic drug, it would be for sale in gardening stores. People would use it to accelerate plant growth. It would be produced by legit, contactable companies who would feel no need to work in such a cloak and dagger fashion. But none of this is the case.
Why? Because Mephedrone cannot be used as f
ucking plant food.