Ok well I just looked at that post and thats all you said actually so I agree that is odd

I have sent the admin copy of the U2U to you again.

Red

As James said, a mod has to attach a warning to a post by you, they cannot attach a warning via a u2u so just picked a post by you on the forum.You were warned for sending an abusive u2u to another forum member.

Yeah I think that must have been the case. If I had a warning though I would leave it rather than discussing it and digging myself further into trouble....

I think its just best if this is dropped albie. You were given a warning for a reason. Mods dont just go handing them out willy nilly. rather than posting a thread slating mods you could have approached one via a u2u and discussed this away from the forum. It just creates a bad atmosphere!!!!!

I agree Kizwiz:thumbs:

I'm not talking about that warning. I'm talking about the one given for something I posted on the Michael, Mikey and Imogen thread.

And that 'abusive' u2u message is rubbish. Slezer called me a fag on a thread. He said that there was nothing wrong with calling people a fag. I sent him a u2u saying ' If it's ok to call people fags why don't you go and do it on the boards.'

Then I called him a fag.

If it's ok to call me a fag, then why is he complaining to the mods about me calling him one? Now, does that seem so abusive now?

Slezer can't take it that I'm right so he has to be underhanded. Just like his namesake.

Now. Can I please have someone pay real attention to this?

We are paying attention, we are telling you to dicuss it with the mods!

I am! On here. I sent a u2u to one of the top mods and didn't get a reply. To be safe I started this thread.

I got a reply for this thread. Not mu u2u. Yeah?

I got a warning for the mikey imogen michael thread, but there was no red message from the mod on the thread to say why.

That's my point.