ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB9 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=99)
-   -   What if the house pictures were fakes?? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=56570)

Cody™ 27-05-2008 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?
who builds houses? who designs them?
Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh.

Cody™ 27-05-2008 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Tom
Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Tom
Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.
but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!
I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.
why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'
According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word

http://www.askoxford.com/results/?vi...archtype=exact
well it's not a proper word: it's like jamp.
You can't argue with the Oxford dictionary. They are the people who decide what is a word and what isn't. It clearly has stupider listed under adjectives, therefore it is a word.
well now i feel 'stupider' than Cody but its still a stupid word:
I wouldnt dispute that.

Sam1994 27-05-2008 10:05 PM

So what you are basically saying is, that they've spent thousands of pounds on building a house, took about 15 pictures, then took everything away and built a new house? What gain do these people get from this? All they're basically doing is losing thousands of pounds. That is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard.

John. 27-05-2008 10:05 PM

but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star. [/quote]

Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures? [/quote]


who builds houses? who designs them? [/quote]

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes??

xDramatick 27-05-2008 10:06 PM

Ridiculous.

Cody™ 27-05-2008 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures? [/quote]


who builds houses? who designs them? [/quote]

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]

I think you know the answer to that question now.

John. 27-05-2008 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sam1994
So what you are basically saying is, that they've spent thousands of pounds on building a house, took about 15 pictures, then took everything away and built a new house? What gain do these people get from this? All they're basically doing is losing thousands of pounds. That is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard.
no what i'm saying is they've
1. built the house,
2. decorated it
3. taken pictures
4. redecorated it

all in order too fool us. who knows what big brohter is up to.

plus they would spent thousands if they wanted this series to be successful!!

Cody™ 27-05-2008 10:09 PM

Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.

John. 27-05-2008 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?

who builds houses? who designs them? [/quote]

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]

I think you know the answer to that question now. [/quote]

i'm not giving this up!!! they could quite easily have redecorated the place since these pictures were taken!!

therefore that would make these pictures out-of-date, thus meaning they are not true, thus meaning they are FAKE!!!

:tongue:

Jase 27-05-2008 10:11 PM

Iv had thought about fake pics being taken but they wouldnt go tru all the trouble

Sam1994 27-05-2008 10:11 PM

Oh, I thought it was the stupidest idea. Now I just think it's stupid.

Also about the money thing, they don't need that much to make the series a success, it's the housemates and their interactions that count for the most. :bouncy:

John. 27-05-2008 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.
who knows, it could have gone white, that might make a difference.

or green, or orange, you never know with Big Brother

John. 27-05-2008 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sam1994
Oh, I thought it was the stupidest idea. Now I just think it's stupid.

Also about the money thing, they don't need that much to make the series a success, it's the housemates and their interactions that count for the most. :bouncy:
nut you need to give the housemates a good place to interact in. and if C4 want to make BB9 a success they will spend the money.!!

!!this thread is about the possibility of fakes house pictures, not the interactions of housemates.!!

Sam1994 27-05-2008 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.
who knows, it could have gone white, that might make a difference.

or green, or orange, you never know with Big Brother
So, a housemate goes into a room sees a white wall and says "Oh no, a white wall, I need to leave now"

Cody™ 27-05-2008 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?

who builds houses? who designs them?
Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]

I think you know the answer to that question now. [/quote]

i'm not giving this up!!! they could quite easily have redecorated the place since these pictures were taken!!

therefore that would make these pictures out-of-date, thus meaning they are not true, thus meaning they are FAKE!!!

:tongue: [/quote]

Well you keep believing that then. Just dont hold your breath on launch cos you will be disappointed.

Tom 27-05-2008 10:13 PM

The house will probably be slightly different to what we see next Thursday anyway, it always is.

Sam1994 27-05-2008 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom
The house will probably be slightly different to what we see next Thursday anyway, it always is.
Yes, I would agree with that.

But I doubt they would re-decorate the whole place

Jase 27-05-2008 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?

who builds houses? who designs them?
Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]

I think you know the answer to that question now. [/quote]

i'm not giving this up!!! they could quite easily have redecorated the place since these pictures were taken!!

therefore that would make these pictures out-of-date, thus meaning they are not true, thus meaning they are FAKE!!!

:tongue: [/quote]

I think they would do this only as a teaser the the papers a few months before the show starts

Cody™ 27-05-2008 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom
The house will probably be slightly different to what we see next Thursday anyway, it always is.
Yea. They should have more furniture. Im expecting a larger sofa for the lounge area.

John. 27-05-2008 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sam1994
Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.
who knows, it could have gone white, that might make a difference.

or green, or orange, you never know with Big Brother
So, a housemate goes into a room sees a white wall and says "Oh no, a white wall, I need to leave now"
what if absolutly everything was black and white apart from the button to the diary room. no colour would drive a person mad.

John. 27-05-2008 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sam1994
Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.
who knows, it could have gone white, that might make a difference.

or green, or orange, you never know with Big Brother
So, a housemate goes into a room sees a white wall and says "Oh no, a white wall, I need to leave now"
what if absolutly everything was black and white apart from the button to the diary room. no colour would drive a person mad.

John. 27-05-2008 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sam1994
Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.
who knows, it could have gone white, that might make a difference.

or green, or orange, you never know with Big Brother
So, a housemate goes into a room sees a white wall and says "Oh no, a white wall, I need to leave now"
what if absolutly everything was black and white apart from the button to the diary room. no colour would drive a person mad.

Sam1994 27-05-2008 10:19 PM

I would love to live in a black and white house! That would be so cool!

I feel more comfortable in the dark :dance2:

John. 27-05-2008 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
Quote:

Originally posted by Cody™
Quote:

Originally posted by jad22247
but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.
Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?

who builds houses? who designs them?
Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh.
well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]

I think you know the answer to that question now. [/quote]

i'm not giving this up!!! they could quite easily have redecorated the place since these pictures were taken!!

therefore that would make these pictures out-of-date, thus meaning they may not be true, thus meaning they could be FAKE!!!

:tongue: [/quote]

Well you keep believing that then. Just dont hold your breath on launch cos you will be disappointed. [/quote]

i can't hold my breath for 9 days!!

John. 27-05-2008 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sam1994
I would love to live in a black and white house! That would be so cool!

I feel more comfortable in the dark :dance2:
the only colour would be the sky.
the grass would be grey.
everything black and white for 3months, i dont think so


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.