DigitalSid |
15-05-2009 04:26 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by President
Quote:
- I WAS told the 5th of June early last year and incase you were living under a rock or watching something else:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Brother_2008_(UK)
it did.
Quote:
Doctor Who's 2009 4 standalone specials have been planned to air this year since late 2005!
The first two were scheduled before the last series went to air!
Do you really think big broadcasters with 24 hours of schedules to fill and up to 336 shows a week to pencil in do them at the last second do you?
|
I'm not stupid. Of course I know that broadcasts are scheduled months in advance.
But you made it sound like a fact that it would be 5th June.
- Where?
Quote:
A provisional date would have been set as I said, months ago, and then if needed due to unforseen competition or news events changed accordingly later on. Usually (I'd say 8 in 10 times) this provisional date is the same as the final one used.
The longer the show, the earlier it's planned. BB's 13 weeks long, which by UK standards is very long.
Anyone who studies or takes an interest in media could tell you this.
|
I have interest in the media. But as I said above, you made it sound like a fact that it would be June 5th.
- Where?
You could have said the "provisional" date (or target date) was Friday 5trh June.
- :rolleyes: You do realise I was referring to last year, it was both the provisional and final date.
But instead you made it up like a fact. Maybe you should reconsider how you post stuff on the Internet making false claims. It's totally out of order, and you're trying to make an image of yourself as to someone who works in the media having inside info.
- It was a fact.. last year. I won't rise to responding to the last sentence of this paragrah.
But really you're just a College boy with an interest in media, but a dillusional image of himself as some kind of media/insider person.
- Read above :thumbs;
|
Response in the quote ^
Why did you PM this and post it?
|
Maybe you should be clearly next time. You said "last March" so I thought you meant March 2009. and talking about this year's date.
Anyways, I still stand by my general viewpoint about you. All talk, little substance. [/quote]
I was perfectly clear, you just didn't read it properly. What part of the word last confuses you? :laugh:
I've already posted as much proof as I'm able to in another thread on here, not that I need to verify myself, I refuse to pander to your dis-trust because quite frankly your opinions, beliefs and feelings mean sod all to me and not just in the grand scheme of thing.
Anyway, have a nice day President or don't, as I said, I really don't care.
|