Originally Posted by JTM45 (Post 6178205)

Apparently Emma tweeted saying that her "Takes two to tango" comment was in reference to the past four weeks and not the incident in the safehouse.
She's obviously feeling the backlash.

Originally Posted by anne666 (Post 6178243)

Emma has splinters in her backside from sitting on soooo many fences. Can't stand the sycophantic woman.

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 6178202)

Sadly, there are a lot of women around who come across as being cock-pleasers. They always see the other side when it comes to sympathising with a man, but are really hard on other women. I think it's a kind of "Look at me! I'm not like other women... I really understand you boys". Don't really get that. It's okay to criticise Hazel, it's okay not to like her... but some of the things I've read on this forum over the last couple of days have sickened me. And Emma's touchy-feel, very understanding interview with Daley, as he choked back the tears last night... Give me a *******ing break. And the fact that his "girlfriend" was there last night reinforces the idea for me that men like Daley gravitate generally toward women who'll tolerate their behaviour.

I don't want to pretend that Hazel is totally blameless, she was provocative to a degree, and in hindsight I'm sure she realises she could have handled things differently... but nothing could justify Daley's actions. And all the people calling her a ***** and a slut because she flirted with him... WTF...? She is a single woman, if he's got a girlfriend the onus is on HIM to be faithful, not her.

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 6178269)

Not really fair on Emma. She does as she's told by the producers who, in turn, take advice as necessary from the company's lawyers.

I sensed from the hesitations last night that Emma was getting instructions via her earpiece.

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 6178267)

Which is exactly what I said she meant last night, some people really don't listen and clearly don't watch BOTS enough to know what things Emma says regularly

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 6178269)

Not really fair on Emma. She does as she's told by the producers who, in turn, take advice as necessary from the company's lawyers.

I sensed from the hesitations last night that Emma was getting instructions via her earpiece.

Originally Posted by RichardG (Post 6178254)

The people who have double standards are the ones who fully supported Denise pulling the twins shorts down in CBB because they hated them, yet are disgusted at Hazel pulling Daley's shorts down because they hate HER. I remember when the twins were sat in the diary room screaming "we're gonna sue!!" and everyone was moaning about what an overreaction it was, and yet Daley responds by pinning Hazel to the bed by her neck threatening to "nut her" and that's a perfectly fine reaction? There's the real double standards.

Originally Posted by anne666 (Post 6178295)

Pity someone doesn't sue the company for negligence , irresponsibility or whatever.I am not a solicitor but to me they are culpable.

Originally Posted by anne666 (Post 6178295)

Pity someone doesn't sue the company for negligence , irresponsibility or whatever.I am not a solicitor but to me they are culpable.

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 6178322)

I think so too. If Hazel had been genuinely hurt then BB would have been open to all kind of lawsuits for failing to protect a Hm.

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 6178322)

I think so too. If Hazel had been genuinely hurt then BB would have been open to all kind of lawsuits for failing to protect a Hm.

Originally Posted by EyeballPaul (Post 6177655)

Still no excuse for how he handled it.He should have just pulled her pants down,Not threatened to nut her!

Originally Posted by Miranda123 (Post 6178349)

Had he pulled down her pants, he would have been evicted, which is why she should have been evicted too

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 6178346)

The HMs probably have to sign a legal disclaimer. You can be sure that after all these years the legal side of things is tightly drawn.

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 6178306)

I agree with that. And I do think Hazel shouldn't have done that but I do think that a warning was sufficient as it was in Denises case

Originally Posted by Miranda123 (Post 6178368)

Denise was a woman, doing it to a woman, and she did not manage to pull the twins pants down completely so we saw nothing

Hazel pulled Daleys pants all the way down and therefore should have been ejected for sexual assault, which is how it would have played out had she been a guy doing it to a girl who didnt want it done

no one here is trying to justify Daleys actions but please stop trying to justify Hazel cause we are all gonna let her (and the rest of the housemates) know exactly what went on, when we all boo her to f..k on Friday night

Dans face will be a confused picture lololololol

Originally Posted by CaudleHalbard (Post 6178346)

The HMs probably have to sign a legal disclaimer. You can be sure that after all these years the legal side of things is tightly drawn.

Originally Posted by cfromhx02 (Post 6177647)

Hazel pulled Daley's boxers down and slapped him on the bottom.IMO Nothing justifies him pinning her down then gesturing to head butt her.

Is it right that most on BBOTS will do anything to justify cementing opposition against one of their targets, which at the moment is Hazel for what I think too was horrible behaviour how she used to flirt with Daley and was the main one leading things between them.

Is it right they were saying that her pulling down his boxers and slapping him instigated and was partly responsible for him threatening her later by holding her down then threatening to nut her ?

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 6178387)

I don't think so. Its like on I'm a celeb when certain contestants are excused from tasks on medical grounds. As soon as they enter the show the producers have an obligation to protect them and thus BB has been accused of being over protective at times. I think BB knows they kept the camera rolling for a few seconds too long on Sunday and thus the evidence has gone online and the arse licking interview with Daley last night.

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 6178352)

How do you know that? No one has ever in the history of BB been kicked out for doing that

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 6178202)

Sadly, there are a lot of women around who come across as being cock-pleasers. They always see the other side when it comes to sympathising with a man, but are really hard on other women. I think it's a kind of "Look at me! I'm not like other women... I really understand you boys". Don't really get that. It's okay to criticise Hazel, it's okay not to like her... but some of the things I've read on this forum over the last couple of days have sickened me. And Emma's touchy-feel, very understanding interview with Daley, as he choked back the tears last night... Give me a *******ing break. And the fact that his "girlfriend" was there last night reinforces the idea for me that men like Daley gravitate generally toward women who'll tolerate their behaviour.

I don't want to pretend that Hazel is totally blameless, she was provocative to a degree, and in hindsight I'm sure she realises she could have handled things differently... but nothing could justify Daley's actions. And all the people calling her a ***** and a slut because she flirted with him... WTF...? She is a single woman, if he's got a girlfriend the onus is on HIM to be faithful, not her.

Originally Posted by anne666 (Post 6178412)

This .I am fed up with hearing the pant pulling down excuse . That kind of behaviour has been part and parcel of BB since it began

Originally Posted by Miranda123 (Post 6178386)

Emma tells it like it is, she understands (like most girls) exactly what Hazel was up to, unfortunately the men on here seem a but stupid when it comes to girls like this

EMMA WILLIS TELLS IT LIKE IT IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CANT WAIT FOR HAZZELS INTERVIEW (if she gets one)lol

Originally Posted by thesheriff443 (Post 6178435)

when you are a lot older most on here will glad to have someone pulling their pants down to avoid embarrassment:shocked::joker: