| Jack_ |
27-06-2017 06:20 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by sampvt
(Post 9399878)
If you give me 20 mins ill search back to see how many times you have pulled your mates up for vitriolic posts. Isnt that what you are ragging Kaz about. Whats good for the goose, etc. You hunt and rag me loads but all I do is fight with you (metaphorically of course) and I end up in trouble for arguing my points. Isnt this what you mean, your post has so many holes Im having trouble following your points. You cant insult someone for something they did not do just because it upsets your morals.
|
Be my guest, if you quote them here and they display the same qualities that I'm describing (mocking someone's appearance or slutshaming them) I'll denounce them right here and now, because I'm a man of my word and consistent. You must realise however that I'm not going to always see every post, but I can assure you that last year in particular I was criticising people who were mocking Jason's appearance. What I was 'ragging' Kaz about (strange turn of phrase) was more that she was (rightly) saying that threads like these are nasty and unnecessary, but at the same time allowing herself and others to be nasty about the way other housemates look, and call women sluts and slappers.
And let's just get this clear Sam - I don't hunt you at all. The large majority of the time (with a few exceptions that I'll concede), it is you that responds to my posts in an abrasive and patronising manner - and so I respond in kind, that's the way it works. Then you accuse me of the very same thing and make out I started it. Look, I'm sure you're a nice man and I have no desire to constantly argue with you, but more often than not it is you that talks down to me and thus what starts it off. If you responded to my posts in a more civilised manner there honestly wouldn't be an issue. |
