Originally Posted by Rob! (Post 9827536)

This is what Smithy was like at Boots. Mincing around, causing trouble :nono:

Originally Posted by Rob! (Post 9827536)

This is what Smithy was like at Boots. Mincing around, causing trouble :nono:

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 9827538)

Actually I was in charge and it was very smooth sailing :idc:

Originally Posted by Adam. (Post 9827541)

That is not what Trip Advisor says :fan:

Originally Posted by T* (Post 9827547)

tripadvisor is where you review pharmacies?

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 9827316)

It’s a point based system whereby 9 points mean a one day ban (iirc) and then it goes up from there

But each infraction comes with a set number of points, but the problem is people don’t know how many points they have per infraction :shrug:

Originally Posted by Cal. (Post 9827631)

Surely not knowing how many points you have makes it harder for you to be like 'hmm well I have 4 points until I'm banned for a day so I could risk getting a 1 point infraction to call LeatherTrumpet a twat'

Originally Posted by Cal. (Post 9827631)

Surely not knowing how many points you have makes it harder for you to be like 'hmm well I have 4 points until I'm banned for a day so I could risk getting a 1 point infraction to call LeatherTrumpet a twat'

Originally Posted by Cal. (Post 9827641)

Idk if I made much sense then but basically knowing your own infraction points would just allow you to plan when you're gonna be a bitch which sounds lovely for us but would be awful for the mods!

Originally Posted by Cal. (Post 9827641)

Idk if I made much sense then but basically knowing your own infraction points would just allow you to plan when you're gonna be a bitch which sounds lovely for us but would be awful for the mods!

Originally Posted by Jay. (Post 9827330)

I remember getting one for mentioning the name of a shop in soap and without any hesitation I received one 12 hours later, with no reply when I asked why.

Just needs to be more transparent and I'm surprised it isn't already. That idea should work a lot better because it helps us almost police them, so it keeps everything fair.

Originally Posted by Smithy (Post 9827297)

Anyway, on topic :hee: it’s been brought up numerous times but I’m gonna bring it up again because something needs to be done on the site bc it drives members away.

WHY is there no set infraction system on the site? for years now infractions are handed out by mods with zero consistancy at all and as much as mods will say they have no bias, it’s quite blatant that there is and always will be, on top of that there is no appeal system and whenever I personally have replied to an infraction I have never received a response and I imagine many members are in the same boat.

I really don’t understand why mods/admin are so against have a rigid structure of what is classed as a rule break and what isn’t, it’d completely rule out any accusation of bias because it’d be there in black and white as to what is against the rules. It seems like atm there’s far too much of a grey area where depending on who the mod is they can decide what to infract and what rule they want to relate it to.

Originally Posted by Jordan. (Post 9827751)

Who has the infraction system driven away apart from a few racist oldies? if anything that's a reason to keep it how it is :flutter:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 9827508)

But we're then expected to know who is friends with who at a particular time, I've often read posts in the chat thread thinking 2 people are having a laugh and then 2 minutes later one of them is reporting the other one for insults

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 9827511)

See what I mean though, you were joking, I thought you were serious [emoji23]

Originally Posted by Mokka (Post 9827713)

Thanks Smithy... couldn't have summed it up better :clap1:

Originally Posted by Cal. (Post 9827631)

Surely not knowing how many points you have makes it harder for you to be like 'hmm well I have 4 points until I'm banned for a day so I could risk getting a 1 point infraction to call LeatherTrumpet a twat'

Originally Posted by Sullen Girl (Post 9827776)

remember kirk’s cover of hurt by johnny cash

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 9827772)

Well obviously Josy isn't going to accidentally ban someone for 6 years and not 6 days you silly. [emoji23]