As much as you want that to be true, the fact is it's not, is it?

Robinson was a journalist for Rebel media, he was thrown in prison for reporting on a sex grooming gang case as an independent journalist.

He's not going away, trying to shut him up makes him stronger.

Well no they can't if they want to be seen as independent and impartial they can't be relying on sources like that.

If you're not sure what I'm referring to what are you basing your argument on?
Educate yourself and then come back with a more informed opinion.

I see you are feeling suitably roused

Nick Griffin was ended by appearing on Question time, why don't you want Tommy to be given a platform on mainstream television?

Ye have little faith in the people

What sources should they use?

I'm talking generally - if they're reporting on something, of course they're going to use sources, I don't need to know what you're referring to.
So in which article did they cite Breitbart?

Yeah that's part of the reason all sides should support giving platforms to vile people - until that creature appeared on Question Time, the BNP controlled several councils, and they basically evaporated when people saw what he believed.

I don't, you're right... I think that people are easily led... spoonfed rhetoric and prejudice by the alt right via mediums like breitbart. As well as adopting views espoused by robinson.

Not an alt right one..

you are approaching this debate from a position of pure ignorance as you haven't even attempted to research where I'm coming from in relation to this issue. I'm not minded to lay out the facts for you here.

Have you turned into Dezzy or something, why can't you link the article you're talking about? I did a quick google, did you mean this? It's hardly glowing with praise.

And people will say the same about far-left socialist rhetoric and prejudice via mediums like The Guardian. Why not just let the people be free to listen and make up their own mind freely?

Your solution of censoring certain opinions is quite a fascist solution. That doesn't mean I think you're fascist, because I don't think you are, It just means that I think you're wrong on this.

The Guardian is "far left socialist"? :joker:

Breibart is far-right:joker:

Anyone can do that.

The Guardian is not far left socialist rhetoric ... :/

It's not a fascist solution to suggest that an independent broadcaster doesn't give a platform to the alt right.

The Guardian is a mainstream tabloid; it's left, but it's the flipside of something like the Daily Mail, not a niche right-wing opinion piece site like Breitbart.

If you're looking for a lefty comparison to Breitbart, it would be Huffington Post... not The Guardian.

I think the FACT that ALL mainstream media has reported on this, and the FACT that NONE are owned by jews is very telling on the way the public are seeing this.

Did I say it was? or did I say that's what some people say? Just in the same way people say Breitbart is far-right, alt-right.

It gives a platform to far-left socialists to contribute to it, does it not? Do you think it should be stopped from doing that?

[Labour drops investigation into Margaret Hodge
row with Jeremy Corbyn]

https://news.sky.com/story/labour-dr...orbyn-11463699

So he has basically admitted to being a racist old bastard.:shrug:

Nope. If socialists or fascists want to expose themselves, I say give them the platform so we can all see. I'm all for there being more opinions visible, not less.

And if the Graniaud were to turn into an outlet exclusively for the far left, then the market would respond and they'd either lose massive business or gain twice the readership. Either way, it'd be on their heads!

It's not down to personal interpretation. Breitbart is unashamedly far right.

I'm really disappointed in that, should he or any other male MP have delivered such an attack on a female member it would've been a national scandal!
She shouldn't be allowed to be so offensive without recourse.

More fibs about Mrs.Hodge.
Labour first saying that she apologised, now saying she had showed regret. Statements from both her and her solicitors denying both the apology and her “being regretful “.
You couldn’t make it up....oh hang on.:joker:

I think that anyone who puts any stock in any tabloid is a mouth-breathing idiot, quite frankly Alf. I don't think anyone should be "stopped" from doing anything as that would be political censorship, however, I do think people - everyone - should stop buying and reading them.