Originally Posted by Withano (Post 10100036)

But you literally missed it and started talking about something that has nothing to do with the thread :think:

Again, i’ve got to suggest you havent really absorbed the idea of the thread :think:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 10100045)

Like most threads the discussion accommodates directly related issues. Is that so difficult to comprehend. I know you like to see yourself as some kind of thread/speech controller but forgive me if I disagree.

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 10100024)

"Lad" ? I'm a woman :joker:

And the world has gone mad . I used "tall blondes " as an example as people have different preference , there is some people more attracted and sexualky attracted to tall blondes . just like some prefer petite /slim rather than bigger people.

My point is it's a preference ,are those people discriminating against others NO :nono:.

Unless they have hate or unhealthy attitudes ,then there's no issues.

I don't know where you've been. Even in celebrity Big brother back in January , India played the transphobic card :bored: just because Ginuwine was honest and said he WOULDN'T date a trans person .

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 10100048)

:think: no I think you just love changing the topic to something that makes you angry. It's odd.

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 10100051)

What is odd is that it’s obvious that I responded directly to other posts but no such criticism from you about them apparently going off topic. Funny that. :shrug:

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 10100053)

:think: that isn't what happened.

Originally Posted by lime (Post 10100050)

Do you not get that a preferece for blonde's is not the same as a preference to a sexuality or gende


To compare hair colour to gender is weak at best

You are right though you don't where I have been


I can tell you now globally this opinion is by and large considered small minded.


As much as I love BB...I won't base my opinioin on A CBB in INdia

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 10100052)

I think this thread has proven how most people will react to a headline without reading the article in question.... And people get pissy at me for suggesting the public as a whole are rarely informed.

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 10100052)

I think this thread has proven how most people will react to a headline without reading the article in question.... And people get pissy at me for suggesting the public as a whole are rarely informed.

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 10100056)

But you are also a member of the public - just the same as the rest of us. :shrug:

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 10100058)

Well the title of the thread is misleading. But I would say I am informed

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 10100059)

And I can still criticise the public any way I please, just like anyone else can because that's what freedom of speech is.

Instead of trying to deny me that with odd an ineffective ways of trying to shut down my opinion, try arguing against it.

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 10100060)

But you don't represent the public.

Just because you think you are informed doesn't mean much for everyone else. You aren't the public as a whole, you are, like every other individual, a grain of sand in the desert that is the public.

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 10100066)

Well obviously we're all different :shrug: .

Like I said the title of the thread was misleading ,which is probably why some people seem "misinformed" . But the article is there for people to read :idc: .

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 10100068)

They reacted to the thread title without reading the article. That's why so many people in this thread think he has been sacked from the NHS when he simply didn't get a job as an assessor.

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 10100055)

I'm not just comparing hair colour , there's all kinds of dating preference . im not arguing I'm just stating those as examples.

There's people who don't date outside their race .

And I don't think it's a weak comparison, you're missing the point .

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 10100052)

I think this thread has proven how most people will react to a headline without reading the article in question.... And people get pissy at me for suggesting the public as a whole are rarely informed.

Originally Posted by lime (Post 10099967)

Listen I'm a straight mother of 4...the world has not gone crazy lad.....You tlk about having a blonde as as a preferance....blonde is a hair colour ...not a sexual preferance....

BTW Who out of interesd who told you .."you wouldn't be allowed to say you WOULDN'Tdate a trans person"...


Jez talk about dumb logic

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 10100068)

They reacted to the thread title without reading the article. That's why so many people in this thread think he has been sacked from the NHS when he simply didn't get a job as an assessor.

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 10100180)

Anyone can be discruminated against including things like hair colour, weight, looks, intelligence, accent - many things that people are born with and can’t change.

In their head and usually in practice everyone discriminates about something. But for me to make up half the world population, I think it’s a bit more, and still be discriminated against by all, including minority groups, is the worst discrimination of all. It really is coming at you from all directions then and an insitution.

Originally Posted by lime (Post 10100189)

Brillo there is a vast difference between who a preference and discrimination....Surely any adult can see that?