![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Why mention it? Of course it's a possibility. But it's also a possibility it's someone who is Catholic. Or Buddhist. Or an Atheist. Why mention just that one possibility? |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Well it is a very strong possibility to be fair. That it could have been a muslim I mean.
|
Quote:
is not the same as " i am quite sure more people will sit there to "chat" than in its current activist state" For a start I don't insult people with my post unlike you do and secondly, I state its my opinion where as you make out it is the accepted opinion I prefer my approach, perhaps on reflection you will too.. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You know, one of the reasons Pride is still so important, as many an LGBT person will tell you, is because as a community we recognise the issues faced globally, not just locally. Nobody is ignoring it. I am all for dwelling on homophobic incidences in the UK that are religiously motivated, regardless of the religion. Absolutely. However, in this particularly instance, there is no proof it was a religiously motivated attack and so speculation will just breed needless hate. I do get the fine balance between being a country that embraces multiculturalism while ensuring we promote key values of modern Britain, of which many values of Islam faith, for example, really collide with. We need to limit that bleeding into our culture for the safety of the British people, but that doesn't mean speculating and finger-pointing without evidence or need. That's racially motivated for no reason and undermines tackling such issues when it IS relevant. |
Quote:
What a bizarre reply. I'm not having this conversation with you anymore, you're not even considering the context which surrounds this discussion. |
Quote:
Erm, you and your fellow LGBTQ rainbow worshippersare claiming this is an attack on LGBTQ, just cause a rainbow got painted over...No proof whatsoever as to why it was painted over...never miss a chance to make it all about them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/new...inted-10316026 so the whole thread premise is wrong and is based on a false accusation can the poster alter the title? |
Quote:
It is only a moron would think it wasn’t. A homophobic moron with zero critical thinking thought this was a pride bench. |
Not surprising at all to see it being dismissed :joker:
|
Quote:
|
If you’re saying it’s wrong I’m gonna go ahead and keep it how it is. We both know it’s not chap :thumbs:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It’s pretty easy to see why it was vandalised. That much is evident. Obviously not for some |
It's far more likely to have been someone who was homophobic than someone who just prefers to sit on a black bench...............imo
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I mean it’s pretty obvious |
Quote:
|
It’s not cynical to state the obvious
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.