![]() |
The world would be a better place without ANY religion.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Although if you do watch his rivers' of blood speech, it'a hard to say he got it wrong. And most of what he said is happening. |
Quote:
NON-RELIGIOUS WARS (source: Steve Perry): 1.) The Seven Years’ War (Britain & France) 2.)The American Revolution 3.)The French Revolution 4.)The Napoleonic Wars (France & Europe) 5.)The Revolutions in the Americas 6.)The Wars to create and preserve the British Empire (Boer War, Irish Revolution, and the Great Game with Russia would all be examples) 7.)The American Civil War 8.)The Crimean War 9.)The Spanish-American War 10.)The Great War, The War to End All Wars, or World War I. 11.)The Italian invasion of Ethiopia 12.)The Spanish Civil War 13.)Stalin’s invasions of Finland, the Baltic states, and Poland 14.)World War II 15.)The Chinese Revolution 16.)The Cold War, including but not limited to the Korean War, the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Vietnam War, the American intervention in Grenada, and the Soviet campaign in Afghanistan 17.)The Cultural Revolution in China 18.)Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge Revolution 19.)The Falklands War 20.)The Persian Gulf War between Iran & Iraq 21.)The Persian Gulf War between the United Nations and Iraq The Breakup of Yugoslavia (beginning with Slovenia). More: Philip and Axelrod’s three-volume Encyclopaedia of Wars, is an extensive work which analyses 1,763 wars which have been fought since the beginning of recorded human history, and concludes that only 123 as being religious in nature. This is a mere 6.98% of all wars, but if one removes wars waged in the name of Islam (66), this already low percentage falls by half to just 3.23%. Irrefutably then, non-religious motivations and secular ideologies are to blame for nearly all wars – not Religion. But the above only deals with war and the statement was that “The world would be a better place without ANY religion.” So I’ll continue: What of atrocities, genocide, and other examples of ‘Man’s Inhumanity To Man’ outside of the accepted definition of ‘war’ - as in ‘Dictatorships’?: From R. J. Rummel’s work ‘Lethal Politics and Death by Government’:. Non-Religious Dictator Lives Lost • Joseph Stalin - 42,672,000 • Mao Zedong - 37,828,000 • Adolf Hitler - 20,946,000 • Chiang Kai-shek - 10,214,000 • Vladimir Lenin - 4,017,000 • Hideki Tojo - 3,990,000 • Pol Pot - 2,397,0003 Rummel says: “Almost 170 million men, women and children have been shot, beaten, tortured, knifed, burned, starved, frozen, crushed or worked to death; buried alive, drowned, hung, bombed or killed in any other of a myriad of ways governments have inflicted death on unarmed, helpless citizens and foreigners. The dead could conceivably be nearly 360 million people. It is though our species has been devastated by a modern Black Plague. And indeed it has, but a plague of Power, not germs.” What of Non-State murders? Abul Djabar killed 65 men and boys in Afghanistan by strangling them with turbans while raping them and was suspected of over 300 murders. Javad Iqbal Mughal killed 100 boys Lahore, Pakistan. Luis Garavo killed 172 children in Colombia but suspected of over 400 murders. The historical list totals many thousands and include many more familiar names, from Americans such as Gary Ridgeway (90 victims) and Jeffrey Dahmer, to home-grown monsters such as Harold Shipman (up to 297 victims) and Peter Sutcliffe and Fred and Rose West, and all with not a religious motive in sight. But hey, let’s not stop here; perhaps our streets and homes would be safer if we rid the world of all religion? Let’s just look at a couple of statistics from The Office of National Statistics for 2014: • Latest figures from the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) show that, for the offences it covers, there were an estimated 7.0 million incidents of crime against households and resident adults (aged 16 and over) in England and Wales • The numbers of rapes (24,043) and other sexual offences (48,934) are the highest recorded by the police since 2002/03. 7 Million Incidents of crime in one year, and this is just ‘reported’ crime. But would this crime decrease without religion in the world or increase? Here’s why I firmly believe that crime would escalate: A) Throughout history religion is only to blame for a miniscule percentage of all the atrocities, strife and troubles perpetrated by men against fellow men. B) Without religion, all instances of ‘Man’s In humanity To Man, and all wars and crimes, would be thousands of times greater, because the simple fact is, that the greater billions of religious faithful throughout recorded history have been peaceful and law abiding specifically because of their religious beliefs – and this includes Christians, Muslims, Jews, and other faiths. I’ll leave the last words to the much maligned (on here) Jesus Christ: “For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed the evil thoughts, fornications, thefts, murders, adulteries, deeds of coveting and wickedness, as well as deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride and foolishness. All these evil things proceed from within and defile the man” (Mark 7:21–23). : |
Quote:
I rest my case. |
Quote:
Take God out of the equation and presume that all religion is groundless fantasy, and we are still left with the truth that religion is not responsible for the vast majority of all the ills in the world, and therefore, removing all religion would not render the world a better place, but quite probably would render it a far, far, more terrible place. Thanks for responding anyway. |
The christian god of the bible killed around 25 million in his book and of course happily watches 20,000 children die each day of the year from hunger
around 7.3 million a year or 730 million in the last 100 years hi again kirk |
Quote:
But the statement under discussion referred to religion. If there was no God and no religion, the world would not be a better place, and 20,000 children would still die each day of the year from hunger. And according to Islam there is no God but Allah, so does your claim pertain to him? |
Quote:
No religion would be great as it would mean humans could face up to life and responsibility and it would encourage learning :spin: |
Quote:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp You copied and pasted most of this trash from Conservapedia, which is a far-Right Christian fundamentalist web site: http://www.conservapedia.com/Obama's_Religion Rational Wiki sums them up in a frank and funny way: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conservapedia You should also research Conservapedia's so-called sources. Stop being lazy. |
:hehe:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Rapists murderers cancer etc... Why would a god or any god for that matter create such things????? Additionally the world is flat and a man can survive 3 days at the bottom of the ocean inside a whale. Another man can part the ocean apparently.You can feed 5000 with only 5 fish too. Talking snakes are also real. It's in the bible so it must be true? Santa must be true too and we all know it ain't.:joker::joker::joker: |
If you think about it. Lets say that God created everything. In such a high position of authority why did he not make every human being and animal immortal. He had that option apparently but decided against it.:joker:
|
Quote:
1 Timothy 2:14 And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression. |
Quote:
Where do you learn information from? Serious question, and how would you post collated information from several different sources? When it comes to lists, apart from editing out any irrelevant parts, why would anyone try to rewrite them in their entirety? There are only so many words one can use. Where is this lazy? Posting links is lazy. I have read dozens of articles on this, and cross checked what I posted. I also stated that I have read the usual rebuttal articles too, but after evaluating what I'd read and watched, I believe what I've posted. I tried to post links to the YouTube vids I watched, and I suppose you think they're fake as well? So why don't you post what you regard as the truth then, if you consider the information in my post is 'crap'? Are you saying Obama wasn't and isn't a Muslim? Are you saying he didn't repeatedly lie about his Muslim faith and go to great lengths to conceal it? Are you saying that knowledge gleaned from a 'Right Wing Christian Website' is invalid just because it's a 'Right Wing Christian Website'? I'd be really interested in seeing your evidence which rebuts the information which you dismiss as crap, so please post. I'd have more respect if you did, rather than you merely diving in to discredit without offering your version of the 'truth' - with corroboration. In fact, why don't you take the lists in my post and address each point individually, stating why they're 'crap' and rebutting them with what you maintain is the truth? I call sniping lazy - not the researching and collating of information from multiple sources. |
Quote:
I am disappointed Johnny. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Follow it up by a link showing that the world is actually flat?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.