As a regular to some dingy establishments and back street boozers i disagree about the gay adoption claim as most people i come across would probably shrug and say each to their own before rapidly changing the subject, but i strongly agree about the refugee/ immigrant bit.

Still no answer to this MrWong?

You clearly don't frequent the boozers I do.:laugh:

Oh I know.

It is as shallow as a puddle and I am hoping they will grow out of it.

No mate, i probably do.:joker:

I do copy - and I get the same paper 3 times :joker:

You can play dumb and pretend that they don't exist. That's ok.

So you can't point them out. Thought not.:laugh:


If you want to accuse people of homophobia then at least have the cojones to back up what you are saying.

I'm not doing the legwork for a WUM.

I saw your response when someone kindly did the legwork for you yesterday.

Your claim, your burden.

You have made a serious accusation. Back it up or retract it, like an adult would.

If you are referring to posts that I suspect you are then I see nothing homophobic in them whatsoever. So it is simply your opinion.

Yeh, you've thrown around your out of date numbers a lot, its important for you to understand that your argument means zero when you do this.
Your assumptions that Nancy got less votes than Winston isn't worth my time either, because although it is probably incorrect, it is something neither of us can prove.

Hm this whole post is a lot of nothing really.

The numbers were originally posted by someone on your side of the argument, in order to prove that 53% were for gay adoption.

It is so amusing to watch you dismiss them now.:joker:

Of course I'm dismissing those numbers, they've vastly improved in two years because of the historically significant moments that has happened in the LGBT community since then which you must have slept through.

Are you lot now discussing Gay / straight issues now because the threads story seems to be non existent now.

So what are new figures? And why did one of your lads use the 2013 figures?

You do realise that 2013 was like only a few years ago. What has changed since then?

This is from 2014

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/...e-9173271.html

What Winston said was stupid, but he said it outside the house!

If he had said it INSIDE the house then I can understand the reaction from HMs and the viewers.

But the fact he said it OUTSIDE the house and then for BB to bring it up on the show and for BB to milk it for maximum effect the way they did in that task was a malicious act from BB. They are stirring up hatred in the name of 'entertainment' yet again.

I disagree with Winston's views on gay adoption 100%.

I also disagree with BB's methods of DELIBERATELY sending in a HM, knowing the HM said something unpleasant in the past only to then DELIBERATELY drop the bomb on them inside the house.

Winston was stupid in what he said but it was his opinion which he is entitled to, like it or not.

BB have not been stupid, they have been quite nasty in the way they have dropped him in it like this, and quite distasteful in using his past comment (made away from the BB house) as a form of entertainment. It's pretty sick from BB.

Winston's opinion was distasteful. So is this self appointed 'trial by media' from BB for crucifying their selected HMs for comments they made separately from the show! It's appalling treatment from BB for their 'guests'.

BB planned to humiliate and Destroy Winston from day 1

Who really cares what Winston thinks its not going to make any difference...:nono:

There are plenty of haters of many things in this life...

True. About 20 million people agree with Winston that gay adoption is wrong.

He made his homophobia clear in his VT so he wanted his views known before going into the house. He probably wanted the publicity. He didn't look destroyed to me after the interview and BOTS, he looked just as pompous and arrogant as ever.

BB had no right to bring his comments up and let it dictate his time in the house

Totally.

When you analyse it, it's far more nasty than what Winston said.

Winston made a tasteless comment away from the house, expressing his personal opinion outside the BB house, it was a disagreeable view but it was nothing to do with the show.

BB have deliberately got him in there, (I bet they were all 'two-faced' nice to him behind the scenes, making him feel comfortable about being on the show, all the while luring him in like a lamb to the slaughter), then they dropped the comment bombshell on him in a task, and then fanned the flames of hatred in the name of entertainment. That's an awful, sneaky thing to do.

Well they must have the right or they would be sued. :shrug:
Personally I don't care about a homophobe who used to run a pub which was closed down in a police raid for being a haven for arms and drug dealers. He gets no sympathy from me.

The thing that got me about the other Housemates was that they all kept repeating "I've got a gay friend" which comes off like they're pleading for the gay vote imo, because if I was in there I would've took the Danniella route and just said "I don't agree with your views so that's why I'm voting you out" as that's what true anti-homophobia people would say roundabouts I feel.