But the prosecution didn’t do experiments? They just claimed the DNA was here, there and everywhere, the experiments done show that what they claimed isn’t possible without tampering

I think you should watch part 2 Niamh, and then come back and let us know what you think.

Watch it with an open, but also critical mind.

They cant claim theres DNA without a scientist testing it, are you saying the lawyers just said there was DNA with no tests? I don't think so [emoji1787]

I will do Alf. I watched 2 episodes but tbh it was a bit boring

No my point is that although they’ve tested for DNA and the DNA is obviously present the tests which have been done show that the levels of DNA present are what should be expected and are so far off the charts that it’s obviously planted

According to the defences experts

No, according to independent individuals who conducted the experiments

They claimed there was human bones and it turned out to be a guess

Independent indeed

Who says though?

The phone recording that was left on zellners answer machine by accident from Mark Williams.

They claimed for years they were in possession of a pelvic bone and the recording has him saying not to reply to zellner until they have a look to see if the bone is actually there.

The message was supposed to go to fallon but they called zellner by mistake

Guilty

Or was it by mistake? Maybe it was deliberate?

Why would they deliberately reveal themselves to be liars?

I don't know, but why would they make that type of mistake?

Panic? Due to being asked to hand over the bone and them not actually having it? :shrug: who knows lol

I need to re watch this documentary cause I had them all down as guilty but I don't think I've ever seen the whole video. .it's one if those where you have seen it a few times but only bits n bobs of it..

No one educated me, I have my own mind

Yes they were bent for sure .. Im still waiting to see the blood on the bedding and mattress ,but it was never even mentioned and poor Brendan in prison because of Fassbender getting him to say they slit her throat and stabbed her

This is one that gets me. Other than the "confession" there is absolutely no evidence that her throat was cut or that she was stabbed, all of the evidence shows that she was shot, so to account for him "confessing" to the knife attacks in the bedroom the investigators had to claim that they stabbed her and cut her throat but she was still alive, so they then dragged her outside - with her throat cut - and shot her... leaving no blood trail. It doesn't make sense AT ALL... it's quite clear that the knife attack never happened, which makes it pretty clear that the rest of Brendan's statement is nonsense too. It should have been completely disregarded in the first place.

EXACTLY TS !! not a spot of blood anywhere

Niamh you really must watch series 2 ,you are not seeing the "evidence" on which Avery was charged and found guilty on being ripped to shreds

I really really must watch this. Its something I have been meaning to do for a long time tbh...