[chuff me dizzy]

At long last this poor man has won the right to appeal in the biggest cover up crime Ive ever known

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-...tzpY3nZmACrysc

[Niamh.]

Guilty as sin imo

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Guilty as sin imo

NO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Theresas brother and ex boyfriend are who i think did it ,did you watch it all on Netflix ?

[Smithy]

Great News

Kathleen will DESTROY the attempted prosecution case, the amount of evidence tampering and rules which they broke was insane

[Marsh.]

"Poor man"

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

NO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Theresas brother and ex boyfriend are who i think did it ,did you watch it all on Netflix ?

I watched the first series then did a load of reading up afterwards and I think he definitely did it. I started watching the second but I found it so biased It annoyed me. Peter Hyatt did a good statement analysis on him. Also, I wouldn't say "poor" him anything he's done some horrible **** besides that (that were very glossed over in the documentary. Brendan dassey also told his mother in a recorded phone conversation that Steve sexually abused him

http://statement-analysis.blogspot.c...entencing.html

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

NO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Theresas brother and ex boyfriend are who i think did it ,did you watch it all on Netflix ?

Why would her brother want to kill her? Makes zero sense and also, I found how netflix tried to point blame at the victims family was disgusting. I think we all forgot who the actual victim was in that story through the documentary and it wasn't the cat torturing, woman assaulter ..........

Did you know that Teresa specifically told her boss that Steve creeped her out and she didn't want to go to do his cars anymore, he gave a fake name that last time, he then phoned her 3 times that day hiding his number and once after she'd disappeared when he didn't hide his number

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

I watched the first series then did a load of reading up afterwards and I think he definitely did it. I started watching the second but I found it so biased It annoyed me. Peter Hyatt did a good statement analysis on him. Also, I wouldn't say "poor" him anything he's done some horrible **** besides that (that were very glossed over in the documentary. Brendan dassey also told his mother in a recorded phone conversation that Steve sexually abused him

http://statement-analysis.blogspot.c...entencing.html

Put him on trial for those crimes then, not something he didn’t do

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Smithy

Put him on trial for those crimes then, not something he didn’t do

He did do it imo

[Niamh.]

although no matter what he would be charged with now he'd think he'd get off with it now probably

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Why would her brother want to kill her? Makes zero sense and also, I found how netflix tried to point blame at the victims family was disgusting. I think we all forgot who the actual victim was in that story through the documentary and it wasn't the cat torturing, woman assaulter ..........

Did you know that Teresa specifically told her boss that Steve creeped her out and she didn't want to go to do his cars anymore, he gave a fake name that last time, he then phoned her 3 times that day hiding his number and once after she'd disappeared when he didn't hide his number

In S2 they don’t point at the victims family, they point to another member of Stevens, they also imply the boyfriend was aware of the framing as he had her diary which was in her car the day she went missing

[Denver]

He was already framed once by the police so I'm not sure if he is guilty or has been framed again

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Adam.

He was already framed once by the police so I'm not sure if he is guilty or has been framed again

He wasn't actually "framed" by the Police the first time (although they didn't act on it when another prisoner years later confessed). Steve was known to the Police in the area ( no matter how the documentary tried to excuse his bad behaviour before the rape case) He was sent to prison because the woman who was raped mistakenly identified him (he did look similar to the guy who actually did it) Also, part of that sentence was for something he did do which was running a woman off the road and pulling a gun on her

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

He wasn't actually "framed" by the Police the first time (although they didn't act on it when another prisoner years later confessed). Steve was known to the Police in the area ( no matter how the documentary tried to excuse his bad behaviour before the rape case) He was sent to prison because the woman who was raped mistakenly identified him (he did look similar to the guy who actually did it) Also, part of that sentence was for something he did do which was running a woman off the road and pulling a gun on her

But they had the evidence to prove he didn't do it at the time and disregarded it

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Adam.

But they had the evidence to prove he didn't do it at the time and disregarded it

Was that a ticket stub for something or a receipt? They also had the victim saying it was him

[Niamh.]

Here's a good article for balance

http://thefederalist.com/2018/12/11/...uilty-as-hell/

[Glenn.]

Just shut up with your stupid opinion Nimah he’s innocent

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Just shut up with your stupid opinion Nimah he’s innocent

People could atleast read the other side not just swallow Netflixs narrative. The amazing Kathleen Zellner only agreed to take the case after the documentary made him famous, she'd been ignoring his case for 4 years previous ....probably because she knew he was guilty as sin

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

People could atleast read the other side not just swallow Netflixs narrative. The amazing Kathleen Zellner only agreed to take the case after the documentary made him famous, she'd been ignoring his case for 4 years previous ....probably because she knew he was guilty as sin

How dare you speak ill of Kathleen. She says in s2 that she wouldn’t have taken the case if she believed he was guilty. And she literally ripped the case to pieces. She is a queen.

[Marsh.]

Ok I have my doubts about Avery.

But don't you DARE start on our Kath!!!

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

How dare you speak ill of Kathleen. She says in s2 that she wouldn’t have taken the case if she believed he was guilty. And she literally ripped the case to pieces. She is a queen.

How dd she rip the case to pieces? By trying to blame Brendans brother? Read the article I posted or continue to defend an animal torturing, paedo rapist, whatever

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Ok I have my doubts about Avery.

But don't you DARE start on our Kath!!!

It's ok I don't blame her for wanting a bit of lime light

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Was that a ticket stub for something or a receipt? They also had the victim saying it was him

Also 10 unconnected people who saw him there at the time the ticket said so

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

How dd she rip the case to pieces? By trying to blame Brendans brother? Read the article I posted or continue to defend an animal torturing, paedo rapist, whatever

Ok I will

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Adam.

Also 10 unconnected people who saw him there at the time the ticket said so

Yeah but the woman genuinely believed that it was Steve, they did look alot alike tbf.

What's ironic is that the new DNA evidence that saved Steve that time is what he's trying to tell us is unreliable now ...........