![]() |
What are you on about? Google Translation works fine....
"Merci pour le compliment ! Moi aussi je suis fatigué car j'ai bu et fumé aussi, un peu trop. Bisous !" "Merci pour le compliment !" Mercy pour the compliments!" "Moi aussi je suis fatigué car" My Aussie Jesus's tired car" "j'ai bu et fumé aussi, un peu trop. Bisous !" runs on butt fumes from Aussies, one fart per tropicana. Cheesy surrender kisses! Thanks you google translator! |
Quote:
It's morning time and laughing at my mistakes :P |
Quote:
There are plenty of languages that are simpler morphologically than English – Afrikaans, Thai, Vietnamese, Norwegian, just to name a few. And why have all these Francophones got this attitude that synthesis equals difficulty. Chinese is the epitome of analysis and it’s probably the hardest language anyone can learn and it’s one of the most morphologically simple languages in the world. French, stuck under the tyranny of “L’Académie Francaise” is going stagnant. English on the other hand is free to change. Although it’s currently semi-analytical, it will become more synthetic at some point in the future when the prepositions merge on to the noun into case prefixes, which will then deteriorate over time, which will make way for postpositions with the language back in its analytical state. Then the postpositions will merge onto the noun into case suffixes which will make English synthetic again, having gone full circle. English is free to develop in circles of analysis to synthesis to analysis like all natural languages are doing and have always done: Synthetic (suffixes) [Anglo-saxon] -> Analytical (prepositions) [Modern English] -> Synthetic (prefixes) [in the future] -> Analytical (postpositions) [in the future] -> Synthetic (suffixes) [in the future] etc… and we will have gone full circle and will continue to do so! French on the other hand will die out eventually since it’s so tightly regulated and isn’t allowed to evolve naturally. Inflections derive from particles that merge onto nouns turning into prefixes or suffixes. So, why don’t you proud Frenchies let your language evolve?! So get rid of your egoistic attitude of: “Synthesis = Superiority” and “Analysis = Inferiority”! Languages go through cycles of analysis and synthesis; it just happens to be that English is currently semi-analytical and French is currently semi-synthetic. |
Je m'appelle Deirdre. J'ai 15 ans. J'ahbite a Ireland.. that's probably all wrong but I do french in school and i like it:colour:
|
Vivo en harrogate, Es muy pintoresco y grande. Me encanta harrogate <3
|
I know this is back tracking a bit but someone said French is one of the hardest languages to learn.
I personally think that English must be HORRIBLE to learn. |
Quote:
|
Jeeeez, he's back. :rolleyes:
Because of course he speaks French better than AMA and I do but it's alright. Fom, French is very hard to learn, that's a fact. Its full of twists and rules which doesn't exists in English. English, on the other hand, is quite easy: we don't separate gender, tenses are easy (have, have, has, have, have, have) etc... And I love how it sounds (but that's a personal opinion) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.