Why doesn't Winston just give us a straight answer?
 

He starts rambling on about stuff that has nothing to do with it.

I agree with Winston so what is it you want an answer to?

that's why Emma got frustrated with him, he never gives straight answers or explains things.. he brings up irrelevant stuff

A common reaction from someone who doesn't know what they're talking about

Because he knows that his views are awful, so will just say anything in the hope that people back off.

:clap1:

Ok for those who agree with Winston maybe you can answer the question - why is it abuse for a same sex couple to adopt? Please be specific and highlight why exactly it would be abuse.

Because you are deliberately, with forethought, putting a child in a home without a mother.

How the **** can that be a good thing?

Because y'all can't handle the truth. (his truth)

I don't see an issue so please explain why its bad?

I'm going to enjoy this.

Hello Thrice, so what part of Gay adoption is child abuse? Thats what I really want to know, what part of children being scared, hurt, injured and tormented physically and mentally is comparable to putting them in a house with two loving parents?

For someone so against the gays he sure can't give a straight answer :shrug:

Gay mafia does not allow any other point of view.

*arranges for a unicorn head on Paul's pillow*

Why does he have to? He does not need to justify his view on gay adoption to anyone on this show. He explained himself. People didnt like his answer. There is NOTHING he can say on the subject that people will like so why even bother?

his view on gay adoption is irrelevant to this show so thats quite fitting

Do you think a child having no mum is healthy? Would you deliberately put a child into such a situation?

I keep hearing that everyone has the right to have children. The fact is that that is a selfish view. Children have the right to a mother.

Its polite to answer a questions when asked. Especially as when asked if he stood by what he said. he said as I recall 'Hell Yes' If he's that adamant he should be able to explain why he takes this stance.

Just because someone is female doesn't make them a perfect mother, i can think of a lot of child abuse cases where mothers have been the spawn of satan (and i'm not religious).

Just as long as a child has caring parents whether they be a gay couple, a single parent, or those with religious beliefs, as long as the child will be loved and cared for in a secure and loving home, what does it really matter?

They don't have a mother in a care home either. And as someone who knows a gay man who's adopted a child, I can assure you that there is plenty of 'forethought'. No one just wakes up one day and says 'I think I'll adopt a kid today, and yipee i'm gay so they won't have a mum'. Life's not a fairy tale mate, and any child in care would be lucky to have a loving home to go to, regardless of how many parents and what gender/sexual orientation they are.

But the children in care who would be adopted have no parents. It is selfish of you to deny children a loving home.

Its certainly not unhealthy? What about all those hundreds of people who have abusive mothers who beat up their children? Two dads and two mums can do just as good as a job as a man and a woman, its the person inside not the persons identity.

Its not a selfish view at all, providing people have one loving parent, that is fine for me.

Wanna kill him? Hang him?

It's because he's a politician. Most of them do the same thing. Having irrelevant answers to questions so they don't look as bad. :rolleyes:

Would you rather they stay in a childrens home with no mother or father?

Children need a mother. That is why nature has seen women giving birth to children and nursing them for the last 100,000 years.

he explained himself in the house. If Emma wanted answers, she should watch the tapes. He was being goaded into saying more controversial stuff so this show would have further material to attack him with. If you give an idiot a rope, they'll hang themselves. He did his best not to let them put him in a position to do that bc anything he would have said would have been met with scrutiny. Opposers of him may want to deny that but you know its true

I'd love to have gay parents, they always seem to bring there children up in such a pleasant manner and go the extra mile.

ALL YOU NEED IS 2 LOVING PARENTS! IT DOESN'T ****ING MATTER ABOUT THEIR GODAMN SEXUALITY, IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE.

:hehe:

Children need a mother to be born congratulations, doesn't mean that they need a mother and a father does it? I've never felt appreciated with my Dad, I've coped extremely well with one loving parent, so why should a child be denied of loving parents just because they didn't squeeze them out of their fanny? (Obviously lesbians want to adopt too and should be allowed to, more loving parents are what we should be encouraging.)

No. I would rather they went to a mother and father.

Its not just this, he doesn't give a straight answer to anything from what I have seen, always rambly. Very...politician like :p

No. HE started waffling on about boxing, his support for the homeless, all Emma did was get him back on track.

As for giving him enough rope to hang himself? No one forced him into saying what he said so I dont get that he was lead in any way or baited. He made his comment with little provocation and failed to stand by them.,

If a mother was deceased or couldn't handle children and the dad was on his own it would be child abuse?

it's only fair since Tila got removed over her comments.

Its not even worth trying to explain something to you, its obvious you are stuck in your ancient discriminating ways and seem to pride yourself on deciding that gays shouldn't be allowed to adopt, you're probably one of those imbeciles who think gays shouldn't be allowed to donate blood incase they spread gayness

He won't give a straight answer because likely the real truth and real answer is he does hold the view that gay adoption is child abuse.
Also that he stands firmly by his distorted and prejudiced comments which by the fact he will not retract any part of it, shows the quote is in fact totally his.