![]() |
The Simpsons give 50 reasons not to reelect donald trump in next halloween episode
Quote:
|
:clap1:
|
desperate.
Did the media not learn their lesson last time around? Try to tell us who to vote for and we don't like it. |
Quote:
|
Sounds a bit cringey, but whatever, it's their cartoon.
|
does anyone still watch the Simpsons?
|
Quote:
|
I'm not even a Trump supporter, but this once again highlights how dumbfoundedly awful The Simpsons has grown into in recent years. It was already proven in 2016 that whenever the media blatantly encouraged anti-Trump vendetta, it caused that to be one reason he was elected in protest by people of being sick of being told what to vote for, and this show was one of the examples that caused it, clearly learning nothing now. The Simpsons is meant to just entertain and humour people, it's not supposed to be a political vacuum of bias. In fact, there were almost no jokes in this anti-Trump promo by them, so it doesn't even feel remotely like the show really :skull:. And in the past when it has ventured into politics, as far as the classic era of the show goes at least, it kept things impartial and made fun of everything to therefore appeal to everyone.
Mess and it's supposed to be a Treehouse of Horror halloween episode, is the joke supposed to be that Trump's presidency is "scary"? It's just so preachy and transparent, and ultimately won't do anything to stop people voting Trump. |
Haven’t watched The Simpson’s for years. I’ve seen clips of the South Park Pandemic Special and that looks pretty funny.
|
|
Quote:
Clearly an anti-Trump show but they're at least going about it a more intelligent and sharp way in the episodes |
Quote:
|
The Trump cult will be triggered as hell but no one else will care either way.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'd also like to add that in the video's 50 reasons diatribe, one of the points are on Manchester, embarrassingly misspelling it as... "Machester" :skull:
|
Quote:
|
There's only 50?:shocked:
|
Quote:
Spoiler: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
In short, his very presence in that position of power legitimizes trolling and anti-intellectualism and THAT is doing a lot of damage. |
Quote:
He ignored warnings from his own intel to take the words of dictators, including not even challenging Russia about putting bounties on US troops. The DoJ is supposed to be America's protection, but they've ended up as his own personal lawyers, defending him in court. He's had more of his staff indicted than any president in history, including Nixon. He's consistently put his re-election and business interests ahead of the US interests, and that just to mention a few of the illegal things he's done. It's crazy to suggest he's no different from the others. |
Quote:
I'm neither pro nor anti, I don't really care either way tbh. It'd be just as annoying if a list of reasons to reelect him included "he had a cameo in Home Alone" and "he's LITERALLY making America great!!!111" |
TBH I think "selfishly" the main reason the UK needs to care at the moment is that we're already in a minefield with post-Brexit stuff and, ideally, we want to be dealing with a half-way-sensible US administration when hammering this stuff out. Don't get me wrong - I think the US has us over a barrel with trade either way - but Trump is volatile and unpredictable and will happily offer and then snatch back deals based on other political events. "Well I know we had a great deal on the table but you didn't support us with [X, Y, Z] so forget it" will be constant under Trump.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.