What if the house pictures were fakes??
 

what if the house pictures had been taken months ago, so as too lead us onto a false trail, and the house was totally different??

I don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture changes.

And by fakes i mean properly taken and then the house changed so that it is not the same now!!:wink:

well unless they somehow faked the aerial pics too.. then...

I doubt it. But if they were, I'd be mad!

I doubt it. It looks real to me.

no i don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture

Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.

what'd be the point in that ?

but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!

I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.

too fool us all, and give nothing away for this summer!!


it's like they're leavin a false trail.

EDIT: *leaving

Well I'd be extremely happy if the photos were fake. This is one of the worst houses yet! :sad:

Wasting money for the sake of a few decoration choices? It would have no impact and no speculation value.

They strategically do things like 8 beds and 8 chairs to try and fool us, not invite 60 Minute Makeover in and blow a few thousand to fool us.

why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'

It's not stupid wasting thousands of pounds to fool about at the max 5000 people in the UK :whistle:

thank you Conor :wink:

According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word

http://www.askoxford.com/results/?vi...archtype=exact

Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.

HAHA thanks Tom.

but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.

Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?

well it's not a proper word: it's like jamp.

They usually put up camouflage nets. If they would have done that again there would have been no aerial pictures.

You can't argue with the Oxford dictionary. They are the people who decide what is a word and what isn't. It clearly has stupider listed under adjectives, therefore it is a word.

who builds houses? who designs them?

well now i feel 'stupider' than Cody but its still a stupid word:

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh.

I wouldnt dispute that.

So what you are basically saying is, that they've spent thousands of pounds on building a house, took about 15 pictures, then took everything away and built a new house? What gain do these people get from this? All they're basically doing is losing thousands of pounds. That is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard.

but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star. [/quote]

Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures? [/quote]


who builds houses? who designs them? [/quote]

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes??

Ridiculous.

Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures? [/quote]


who builds houses? who designs them? [/quote]

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]

I think you know the answer to that question now.

no what i'm saying is they've
1. built the house,
2. decorated it
3. taken pictures
4. redecorated it

all in order too fool us. who knows what big brohter is up to.

plus they would spent thousands if they wanted this series to be successful!!

Re-painting a wall from red to blue is hardly going to make a difference to the series.

who builds houses? who designs them? [/quote]

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]

I think you know the answer to that question now. [/quote]

i'm not giving this up!!! they could quite easily have redecorated the place since these pictures were taken!!

therefore that would make these pictures out-of-date, thus meaning they are not true, thus meaning they are FAKE!!!

:tongue:

Iv had thought about fake pics being taken but they wouldnt go tru all the trouble

Oh, I thought it was the stupidest idea. Now I just think it's stupid.

Also about the money thing, they don't need that much to make the series a success, it's the housemates and their interactions that count for the most. :bouncy:

who knows, it could have gone white, that might make a difference.

or green, or orange, you never know with Big Brother

nut you need to give the housemates a good place to interact in. and if C4 want to make BB9 a success they will spend the money.!!

!!this thread is about the possibility of fakes house pictures, not the interactions of housemates.!!

So, a housemate goes into a room sees a white wall and says "Oh no, a white wall, I need to leave now"

Well its definitely not the Daily Star. And if people who designed the house would leak the designs then why wouldnt they do so weeks before? Its because they are contractually bound. So no, they cannot take pictures of the house and get them published for extra dosh. [/quote]

well all i was asking was that what if the pictures were fakes?? [/quote]

I think you know the answer to that question now. [/quote]

i'm not giving this up!!! they could quite easily have redecorated the place since these pictures were taken!!

therefore that would make these pictures out-of-date, thus meaning they are not true, thus meaning they are FAKE!!!

:tongue: [/quote]

Well you keep believing that then. Just dont hold your breath on launch cos you will be disappointed.