Isn\'t \'vote to save\' so much better?
 

Personally, I think that a vote to save rather than to evict this series would be so much better. It would get rid of the dull characters early on.

yeah i think it should start that way this year. some of the awful and boring and forgotten ones would go.

Yeah i love vote to save!

Yeah that way the entertaining ones would stay and the boring ones would go.

yes!!
that way it keeps the more entertaining ones in because all the good ones end up going even if you hate them its more entertaining to keep them in

Yeah, it is. :bigsmile:

Like you said it would get boring housemates out quicker.

I'm not sure if they're going to introduce it this year though, we'll just have to see.

I want vote to save
If they pass the task and vote to save is used a boring housemate will be out
but if it is vote to evict is used a entertaining housemate will be out, probably Alex or Sylvia

Definitely!

The public always get rid of the people that actually make the show interesting!

I hope this happens!

I'd prefer a vote to save and a vote to evict, like BBAU

Yeah, with a 'vote to save' alot of the bigger character's will stay like Alex, Kat, Sylvia, Dennis.....etc.

this would be great coz the boring hms like: mohamed, darnell, luke, rex and michael could leave in the first six weeks or so. vote to evict gets rid of the bigger characters.

Yeah, I think the voting is stupid. IT should be vote to stay so that people don't vote out good characters .

I think it should be.
I could vote for Dennis then and not let the vultures get him ;D

LIKE: Luke, Rex, Mohamed, Darnell, Stephanie
OK: Lisa, Mario, Rachel, Sylvia
Dislike: Dale, KATHREYA, Rebecca, Dennis, Jennifer, Alexandre and micheal

It's miles better! Big characters tend to form split views - people who love them, but then those who can't stand them really can't stand them! As a result, with vote to evict, it's far more likely that people will bother to pick up their phones to vote for their eviction. And we're left with them gone, and a less entertaining house. Voting to save would counteract this problem, because fanbases of bigger BB personalities would vote to save them.

Michael will go much earlier if its a vote to save.

jeez these are repetitive posts

they do sometimes do vote to save don't they?

Very true point!

Can't really say much more than that, lol.

No never.

oh fair dues lmao
weel they shoul alternate then (:

I think they have used it once?
But yeah I would prefer vote to save.

NO.

they should've switched to vote to save ages ago...and if they do this year, it will help the series. It did wonders for BBAU, that's for sure.

I would like to see it, but vote to save doesnt necesarly mean the best characters will stay. In CBB3 they had a vote to save, and it really didnt help the show IMO they same people would have gone had it been a vote to evict.

The only way a save votes works is if you have t least three nominees. If you have just two, then it a backwards evict vote. For example if BB8's Charley & Tracey were up against each other in a save vote, then all the Charley haters would just vote to save Tracey and Charley would be evicted.

Not necessarily. Even if it's two, if it's a close matchup (not tracey and charley) it could make all the difference and keep in the more interesting one.

Well it could be close if it was a evict vote, and if both the characters were well liked, or equally hated. However, Charley was a big charcter, and Tracey was not. However, Charley still would have gone in a save vote because Charley haters could vote to save Tracey. With two nominees, a save vote is just a backwards evict vote.

i think they could do that as one of their twist
but voting 2 evict is better as there will be ppl in the house who will need to get out!!!!!

caugh* alexandra*