ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Cervical Cancer Jab - May Not Safe for 14 year olds (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=119773)

arista 29-09-2009 05:06 PM

Cervical Cancer Jab - May Not Safe for 14 year olds
 
On London Local ITV News
and you Girl can not walk
ever since she started the jabs.


And the Death of that other young girl
is still to be worked out.


But this Rebbeca on London Local ITV News
would have been safe if she did not take the New Labour backed
jab.


At 14
Girls can not take that Toxic jab.
It is to young.

Scarlett. 29-09-2009 05:08 PM

So its unsafe? :shocked:

It should have been properly tested before it was given out!

arista 29-09-2009 05:12 PM

[rquote=2613755&tid=148290&author=Mr.Corrie]So its unsafe? :shocked:

It should have been properly tested before it was given out![/rquote]


This is the problem
the Makers of that Jab claim it got good results in tests.


This has gone Wrong
14 is to young for this Toxic jab.
You can not have a Jab that is a Lucky Dip
like you may be OK, you may Die , or you may no longer be able to walk.

This Stinks.

Scarlett. 29-09-2009 05:15 PM

I agree, it should have been perfected before they even thought of sending it out

arista 29-09-2009 05:27 PM

ITV News also has a Update on this.

Scarlett. 29-09-2009 05:37 PM

I'm watching

It doesnt matter how many have been done safely, this is putting young girls lifes at risk

Twilight 29-09-2009 10:59 PM

I'm not having that jab thats for sure

Tom4784 29-09-2009 11:33 PM

Arista don't make blanket statements like that, for all we know it could have just been an unfortunate rare allergic reaction of some sort. It's to early to damn the injections just yet. We'd have a lot more victims if it were down to just the jabs.

andyman 30-09-2009 01:51 AM

[rquote=2613752&tid=148290&author=arista]On London Local ITV News
and you Girl can not walk
ever since she started the jabs.


And the Death of that other young girl
is still to be worked out.


But this Rebbeca on London Local ITV News
would have been safe if she did not take the New Labour backed
jab.


At 14
Girls can not take that Toxic jab.
It is to young.[/rquote]But under the Torries everything would be safe.. In Arista's strange world.

The benefits out weigh any risks..


Fom 30-09-2009 05:52 AM

I agree with Dean, this could be a very rare reaction and the amount of lives that have been saved with the jab does out weight it a little bit. It is way too early to decide if it has anything to do with the actual jab.

Beastie 30-09-2009 11:47 AM

Im 20 and was thinking of having the jab? but I dont want my life at risk like this :S also after you have the jab and in the future will this effect having a baby at all? like the cancer immune jab wont effect having a baby? ahh i dont know.. was just thinking about the side affects. At the end of the day I dont "sleep around" and when im 25 or before hand if i feel something is wrong I know I will go to the doctor straight away.

Jade Goody could have survived but I think she ignored the abnormal cells or was too scared or something to go for another smear?

arista 30-09-2009 12:00 PM

Yes at 20 these Toxic jabs may be OK.


But at 13 and 14
it is unsafe.

Beastie 30-09-2009 12:02 PM

[rquote=2615354&tid=148290&author=arista]Yes at 20 these Toxic jabs may be OK.


But at 13 and 14
it is unsafe.[/rquote]

Oh right.. thanks :D it is stupid that you have to pay £400 if you are over 18 though! I have 2 cousins... 1 who is 12, one who is nearly 14! I might ask them if they have had the jab done yet? I dont want to see them getting hurt!

Tom4784 30-09-2009 03:51 PM

[rquote=2615354&tid=148290&author=arista]Yes at 20 these Toxic jabs may be OK.


But at 13 and 14
it is unsafe.[/rquote]

You don't know that Arista, stop spreading falsities around. The research is still ongoing so nobody can make any conclusions so far.

Iceman 30-09-2009 05:25 PM

Was it not said that she had serious underlying health issues?

Scarlett. 30-09-2009 05:27 PM

[rquote=2615893&tid=148290&author=Iceman]Was it not said that she had serious underlying health issues?[/rquote]Which brings up the question of why they wasnt considered before giving her the jab

Iceman 30-09-2009 05:28 PM

[rquote=2615896&tid=148290&author=Mr.Corrie][rquote=2615893&tid=148290&author=Iceman]Was it not said that she had serious underlying health issues?[/rquote]Which brings up the question of why they wasnt considered before giving her the jab[/rquote]

Exactly but Arista didn't mention this, he seems to have selective input syndrome.....only puts what he wants to be heard into his posts.........reminds me of the Tories....:love:

arista 30-09-2009 06:31 PM

[rquote=2615709&tid=148290&author=Dezzy][rquote=2615354&tid=148290&author=arista]Yes at 20 these Toxic jabs may be OK.


But at 13 and 14
it is unsafe.[/rquote]

You don't know that Arista, stop spreading falsities around. The research is still ongoing so nobody can make any conclusions so far.[/rquote]


Yes More Research is Needed.
But in the meantime
you follow what you think is best.


That Young Girl on ITV London News
on got like that from taking the Jab.
That is Shocking,
and I base what was shown as a view.

arista 30-09-2009 06:35 PM

[rquote=2615897&tid=148290&author=Iceman][rquote=2615896&tid=148290&author=Mr.Corrie][rquote=2615893&tid=148290&author=Iceman]Was it not said that she had serious underlying health issues?[/rquote]Which brings up the question of why they wasnt considered before giving her the jab[/rquote]

Exactly but Arista didn't mention this, he seems to have selective input syndrome.....only puts what he wants to be heard into his posts.........reminds me of the Tories....:love:[/rquote]

Go back to the 1st post
I said it was about the Girl on ITV London News.
Not the one that died.

{And the Death of that other young girl
is still to be worked out.}
Thats what I posted as at the time of my 1st post
that current info was not out.


Stop being a Lazy Poster
check what you are taling about , first.

pinkmichk 01-10-2009 10:58 AM

the girl that died had a tumour on her lung which noone knew about and that was the cause of death not the jab
i personally think older age should be having the jab over the younger ones given that they dont do smears until 25 anyway surely the first group to be getting it shouldnt be 14 yr olds but those in the 20+ group

pinkmichk 01-10-2009 10:58 AM

the girl that died had a tumour on her lung which noone knew about and that was the cause of death not the jab
i personally think older age should be having the jab over the younger ones given that they dont do smears until 25 anyway surely the first group to be getting it shouldnt be 14 yr olds but those in the 20+ group

Beastie 02-10-2009 02:02 PM

[rquote=2617144&tid=148290&author=pinkmichk]the girl that died had a tumour on her lung which noone knew about and that was the cause of death not the jab
i personally think older age should be having the jab over the younger ones given that they dont do smears until 25 anyway surely the first group to be getting it shouldnt be 14 yr olds but those in the 20+ group [/rquote]

I think it is because most people 20+ are sexually active. When I was college, the girls 16-18 who I was friendly with had the jab but they were already sexually active. They say the jab might not have an affect if you have already had unprotected sex because you would have already caught the virus? Anyway it is being offered at boots now for 18-54 year olds for about £400 and from your gp!

Iceman 02-10-2009 02:55 PM

[rquote=2616029&tid=148290&author=arista][rquote=2615897&tid=148290&author=Iceman][rquote=2615896&tid=148290&author=Mr.Corrie][rquote=2615893&tid=148290&author=Iceman]Was it not said that she had serious underlying health issues?[/rquote]Which brings up the question of why they wasnt considered before giving her the jab[/rquote]

Exactly but Arista didn't mention this, he seems to have selective input syndrome.....only puts what he wants to be heard into his posts.........reminds me of the Tories....:love:[/rquote]

Go back to the 1st post
I said it was about the Girl on ITV London News.
Not the one that died.

{And the Death of that other young girl
is still to be worked out.}
Thats what I posted as at the time of my 1st post
that current info was not out.


Stop being a Lazy Poster
check what you are taling about , first.[/rquote]

Arista I dont read half your posts becuase I cant make

sense of them becuase they

are sread out

like CRAP

andyman 05-10-2009 11:14 PM

Mod please close this thread or change the title as we now know the truth..


Thanks.

Nicky. 09-10-2009 10:08 PM

I'm not having mine, I've had too many allergies in my time, I'm not risking becoming ill from it... my mum says she's not 100% comfortable with me having it, and my best friends mum, who is a nurse, isn't letting her have it either...

We were supposed to have our first one the day after the girl had died 'from it'... or so it was at the time. But they're like, she was ill aswell... but I'm not a daredevil LOL

I think it's something like 100+ people in America have died after having the jab... just seems to suspicious to me. I will just be careful in the future, by going for tests etc.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.