FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
On London Local ITV News
and you Girl can not walk ever since she started the jabs. And the Death of that other young girl is still to be worked out. But this Rebbeca on London Local ITV News would have been safe if she did not take the New Labour backed jab. At 14 Girls can not take that Toxic jab. It is to young. Last edited by arista; 09-10-2009 at 11:18 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
|
|||
Senior Moment
|
So its unsafe?
![]() It should have been properly tested before it was given out! |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2613755&tid=148290&author=Mr.Corrie]So its unsafe?
![]() It should have been properly tested before it was given out![/rquote] This is the problem the Makers of that Jab claim it got good results in tests. This has gone Wrong 14 is to young for this Toxic jab. You can not have a Jab that is a Lucky Dip like you may be OK, you may Die , or you may no longer be able to walk. This Stinks. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
|
|||
Senior Moment
|
I agree, it should have been perfected before they even thought of sending it out
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
ITV News also has a Update on this.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
|
|||
Senior Moment
|
I'm watching
It doesnt matter how many have been done safely, this is putting young girls lifes at risk |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
****
|
I'm not having that jab thats for sure
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Arista don't make blanket statements like that, for all we know it could have just been an unfortunate rare allergic reaction of some sort. It's to early to damn the injections just yet. We'd have a lot more victims if it were down to just the jabs.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
Classic
|
[rquote=2613752&tid=148290&author=arista]On London Local ITV News
and you Girl can not walk ever since she started the jabs. And the Death of that other young girl is still to be worked out. But this Rebbeca on London Local ITV News would have been safe if she did not take the New Labour backed jab. At 14 Girls can not take that Toxic jab. It is to young.[/rquote]But under the Torries everything would be safe.. In Arista's strange world. The benefits out weigh any risks.. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I agree with Dean, this could be a very rare reaction and the amount of lives that have been saved with the jab does out weight it a little bit. It is way too early to decide if it has anything to do with the actual jab.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Im 20 and was thinking of having the jab? but I dont want my life at risk like this :S also after you have the jab and in the future will this effect having a baby at all? like the cancer immune jab wont effect having a baby? ahh i dont know.. was just thinking about the side affects. At the end of the day I dont "sleep around" and when im 25 or before hand if i feel something is wrong I know I will go to the doctor straight away.
Jade Goody could have survived but I think she ignored the abnormal cells or was too scared or something to go for another smear? |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Yes at 20 these Toxic jabs may be OK.
But at 13 and 14 it is unsafe. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2615354&tid=148290&author=arista]Yes at 20 these Toxic jabs may be OK.
But at 13 and 14 it is unsafe.[/rquote] Oh right.. thanks ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
[rquote=2615354&tid=148290&author=arista]Yes at 20 these Toxic jabs may be OK.
But at 13 and 14 it is unsafe.[/rquote] You don't know that Arista, stop spreading falsities around. The research is still ongoing so nobody can make any conclusions so far. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
|
||||
REVIVAL
|
Was it not said that she had serious underlying health issues?
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
|
|||
Senior Moment
|
[rquote=2615893&tid=148290&author=Iceman]Was it not said that she had serious underlying health issues?[/rquote]Which brings up the question of why they wasnt considered before giving her the jab
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |||
|
||||
REVIVAL
|
[rquote=2615896&tid=148290&author=Mr.Corrie][rquote=2615893&tid=148290&author=Iceman]Was it not said that she had serious underlying health issues?[/rquote]Which brings up the question of why they wasnt considered before giving her the jab[/rquote]
Exactly but Arista didn't mention this, he seems to have selective input syndrome.....only puts what he wants to be heard into his posts.........reminds me of the Tories.... ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2615709&tid=148290&author=Dezzy][rquote=2615354&tid=148290&author=arista]Yes at 20 these Toxic jabs may be OK.
But at 13 and 14 it is unsafe.[/rquote] You don't know that Arista, stop spreading falsities around. The research is still ongoing so nobody can make any conclusions so far.[/rquote] Yes More Research is Needed. But in the meantime you follow what you think is best. That Young Girl on ITV London News on got like that from taking the Jab. That is Shocking, and I base what was shown as a view. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2615897&tid=148290&author=Iceman][rquote=2615896&tid=148290&author=Mr.Corrie][rquote=2615893&tid=148290&author=Iceman]Was it not said that she had serious underlying health issues?[/rquote]Which brings up the question of why they wasnt considered before giving her the jab[/rquote]
Exactly but Arista didn't mention this, he seems to have selective input syndrome.....only puts what he wants to be heard into his posts.........reminds me of the Tories.... ![]() Go back to the 1st post I said it was about the Girl on ITV London News. Not the one that died. {And the Death of that other young girl is still to be worked out.} Thats what I posted as at the time of my 1st post that current info was not out. Stop being a Lazy Poster check what you are taling about , first. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
the girl that died had a tumour on her lung which noone knew about and that was the cause of death not the jab
i personally think older age should be having the jab over the younger ones given that they dont do smears until 25 anyway surely the first group to be getting it shouldnt be 14 yr olds but those in the 20+ group |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
the girl that died had a tumour on her lung which noone knew about and that was the cause of death not the jab
i personally think older age should be having the jab over the younger ones given that they dont do smears until 25 anyway surely the first group to be getting it shouldnt be 14 yr olds but those in the 20+ group |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
[rquote=2617144&tid=148290&author=pinkmichk]the girl that died had a tumour on her lung which noone knew about and that was the cause of death not the jab
i personally think older age should be having the jab over the younger ones given that they dont do smears until 25 anyway surely the first group to be getting it shouldnt be 14 yr olds but those in the 20+ group [/rquote] I think it is because most people 20+ are sexually active. When I was college, the girls 16-18 who I was friendly with had the jab but they were already sexually active. They say the jab might not have an affect if you have already had unprotected sex because you would have already caught the virus? Anyway it is being offered at boots now for 18-54 year olds for about Ł400 and from your gp! |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |||
|
||||
REVIVAL
|
[rquote=2616029&tid=148290&author=arista][rquote=2615897&tid=148290&author=Iceman][rquote=2615896&tid=148290&author=Mr.Corrie][rquote=2615893&tid=148290&author=Iceman]Was it not said that she had serious underlying health issues?[/rquote]Which brings up the question of why they wasnt considered before giving her the jab[/rquote]
Exactly but Arista didn't mention this, he seems to have selective input syndrome.....only puts what he wants to be heard into his posts.........reminds me of the Tories.... ![]() Go back to the 1st post I said it was about the Girl on ITV London News. Not the one that died. {And the Death of that other young girl is still to be worked out.} Thats what I posted as at the time of my 1st post that current info was not out. Stop being a Lazy Poster check what you are taling about , first.[/rquote] Arista I dont read half your posts becuase I cant make sense of them becuase they are sread out like CRAP |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |||
|
||||
Classic
|
Mod please close this thread or change the title as we now know the truth..
Thanks. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |||
|
||||
M C F L Y <3
|
I'm not having mine, I've had too many allergies in my time, I'm not risking becoming ill from it... my mum says she's not 100% comfortable with me having it, and my best friends mum, who is a nurse, isn't letting her have it either...
We were supposed to have our first one the day after the girl had died 'from it'... or so it was at the time. But they're like, she was ill aswell... but I'm not a daredevil LOL I think it's something like 100+ people in America have died after having the jab... just seems to suspicious to me. I will just be careful in the future, by going for tests etc.
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|