ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB11 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=551)
-   -   BB Voters Get it Wrong (as usual) (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=157610)

PantherBlack 21-08-2010 05:16 PM

BB Voters Get it Wrong (as usual)
 
BB voters, well, what can I say, your idiocy was confirmed during last nights evictions.

Bar Steve, (the only good choice to be evicted because he didn't do anything interesting in the house apart from one argument with Ben about warfare), you messed up.

All of the 'safe' housemates like Mario, JJ and Andrew should have been the evicted ones!

John James, Sam and Corin have provided arguments and they should have stayed.

Shame on you pathetic voters for being the cretinous morons you really are. You wouldn't know entertainment if it bit you on the arse :joker:

Mystic Mock 21-08-2010 05:19 PM

i think john james and corin should have stayed, but sam and steve deserved to go for being *****s.

PantherBlack 21-08-2010 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedward fever (Post 3695872)
i think john james and corin should have stayed, but sam and steve deserved to go for being *****s.

What are you on about? Sam brought loads of arguments in the house, aka he provided TV Gold! You don't understand good TV.

Barbie 21-08-2010 05:26 PM

I agree, if ever we have had a wipeout of entertaining housemates, its now (except Steve). The public never learns and i blame it on being vote to evict. The producers could have stopped this happening with vote to save.

Shiner 21-08-2010 05:30 PM

It's not the public's fault. Blame the producers for engineering a predictable outcome. A vote to evict when all HMs (bar the golden girl) were up will only see the controversial/entertaining ones eliminated first.

Josielover 21-08-2010 05:33 PM

I don't think you can blame the public. The housemates that got saved are there because it was a vote to evict. I don't care enough about JJ/andrew/mario to pick up the phone and pay to get them out. If it had been a vote to save then it would be a different, more interesting final.

stonedape 21-08-2010 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josielover (Post 3695922)
I don't think you can blame the public. The housemates that got saved are there because it was a vote to evict. I don't care enough about JJ/andrew/mario to pick up the phone and pay to get them out. If it had been a vote to save then it would be a different, more interesting final.

The finalists are lame because it was vote to evict AND the public are predictable twats who always evict the more interesting option near finals. Enough blame to go around for the producers and the public.

ifyoureadthisyouarecool 21-08-2010 05:43 PM

Yayyyyy you guys are aawwesssoommmeeeeee. I really think Big Brother Producers did **** this one right up matey. But then again the public should have really picked up those phones to get out the boring bastards.

Abhorsen 21-08-2010 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PantherBlack (Post 3695865)
BB voters, well, what can I say, your idiocy was confirmed during last nights evictions.

Bar Steve, (the only good choice to be evicted because he didn't do anything interesting in the house apart from one argument with Ben about warfare), you messed up.

All of the 'safe' housemates like Mario, JJ and Andrew should have been the evicted ones!

John James, Sam and Corin have provided arguments and they should have stayed.

Shame on you pathetic voters for being the cretinous morons you really are. You wouldn't know entertainment if it bit you on the arse :joker:

RLMAO.

Get over it, your faves have gone.

The best HMs stayed in, Dave, Mario and Andrew and the trash was thrown out - Sam and John James - now they can go get a room together. LOL. The only one who should have stayed that didn't was Corin.

Abhorsen 21-08-2010 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stonedape (Post 3695927)
The finalists are lame because it was vote to evict AND the public are predictable twats who always evict the more interesting option near finals. Enough blame to go around for the producers and the public.

RLMAO.

It is so funny watching all the John James and Sam fans whinge all over the place.

John James and Sam fans = :bawling:

Abhorsen 21-08-2010 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PantherBlack (Post 3695883)
What are you on about? Sam brought loads of arguments in the house, aka he provided TV Gold! You don't understand good TV.

Did you actually read that before you posted it? Really?

PantherBlack 21-08-2010 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barbie (Post 3695903)
I agree, if ever we have had a wipeout of entertaining housemates, its now (except Steve). The public never learns and i blame it on being vote to evict. The producers could have stopped this happening with vote to save.

They could have stopped it by scrapping evictions altogether. Replacing them with mean tasks would have been better, i.e. vote to send (housemate's name) to the punishment chamber where they have to slag off their housemates to the camera, all the while the housemates are watching them, or show everyone their nominations etc etc.

PantherBlack 21-08-2010 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shiner (Post 3695914)
It's not the public's fault. Blame the producers for engineering a predictable outcome. A vote to evict when all HMs (bar the golden girl) were up will only see the controversial/entertaining ones eliminated first.

I blame both the producers and the public. Read my above post to see what they COULD have implemented.

PantherBlack 21-08-2010 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stonedape (Post 3695927)
the public are predictable twats who always evict the more interesting option near finals. Enough blame to go around for the producers and the public.

^ agreed.

PantherBlack 21-08-2010 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abhorsen (Post 3695973)
Did you actually read that before you posted it? Really?

^ NON fan alert. NON fan alert! :joker:

alc09 21-08-2010 05:56 PM

Who ever went, the final would still have a poor line up as it's the worst set of HMs in the history of the show.

stonedape 21-08-2010 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abhorsen (Post 3695967)
RLMAO.

It is so funny watching all the John James and Sam fans whinge all over the place.

John James and Sam fans = :bawling:

I wish I could say the same about the one person who's so deluded they thought the result last night was good for the show. But it's not that funny. There's a reason no ones agreeing with you.

Shiner 21-08-2010 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stonedape (Post 3695991)
I wish I could say the same about the one person who's so deluded they thought the result last night was good for the show. But it's not that funny. There's a reason no ones agreeing with you.

Sorry Abhorsen but... http://forums.di.fm/images/smilies/clap.gif

Jack_ 21-08-2010 06:23 PM

I agree. Then again, they've always been like this. We should've learnt by now that none of them possess any sort of ****ing intelligence.

Just clueless.

luminoussun 21-08-2010 07:22 PM

I believe it was done to make sure mario got to the finale.
I think he has been fixed the whole program and has played a gay rachel rice role

Captain.Remy 21-08-2010 07:31 PM

and people are still surprised we evict the entertaining ones, it's been like that for 10 years, it wasn't going to change.
John James was too much of a ***** to get to the end, he wasn't even a good entertaining, he was a whining bitch.
I'm very surprised at Sam's eviction, I honestly thought he could have been a bit of a competition to Josie (he'd have eventually ended as first runner-up).
Not surprised about Corin (the usual jealous girls vote) and Steve.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.