About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

PantherBlack · 21-08-2010, 05:16 PM

BB voters, well, what can I say, your idiocy was confirmed during last nights evictions.

Bar Steve, (the only good choice to be evicted because he didn't do anything interesting in the house apart from one argument with Ben about warfare), you messed up.

All of the 'safe' housemates like Mario, JJ and Andrew should have been the evicted ones!

John James, Sam and Corin have provided arguments and they should have stayed.

Shame on you pathetic voters for being the cretinous morons you really are. You wouldn't know entertainment if it bit you on the arse

Mystic Mock · 21-08-2010, 05:19 PM

i think john james and corin should have stayed, but sam and steve deserved to go for being *****s.

PantherBlack · 21-08-2010, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jedward fever

i think john james and corin should have stayed, but sam and steve deserved to go for being *****s.

What are you on about? Sam brought loads of arguments in the house, aka he provided TV Gold! You don't understand good TV.

Barbie · 21-08-2010, 05:26 PM

I agree, if ever we have had a wipeout of entertaining housemates, its now (except Steve). The public never learns and i blame it on being vote to evict. The producers could have stopped this happening with vote to save.

Shiner · 21-08-2010, 05:30 PM

It's not the public's fault. Blame the producers for engineering a predictable outcome. A vote to evict when all HMs (bar the golden girl) were up will only see the controversial/entertaining ones eliminated first.

Josielover · 21-08-2010, 05:33 PM

I don't think you can blame the public. The housemates that got saved are there because it was a vote to evict. I don't care enough about JJ/andrew/mario to pick up the phone and pay to get them out. If it had been a vote to save then it would be a different, more interesting final.

stonedape · 21-08-2010, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josielover

I don't think you can blame the public. The housemates that got saved are there because it was a vote to evict. I don't care enough about JJ/andrew/mario to pick up the phone and pay to get them out. If it had been a vote to save then it would be a different, more interesting final.

The finalists are lame because it was vote to evict AND the public are predictable twats who always evict the more interesting option near finals. Enough blame to go around for the producers and the public.

ifyoureadthisyouarecool · 21-08-2010, 05:43 PM

Yayyyyy you guys are aawwesssoommmeeeeee. I really think Big Brother Producers did **** this one right up matey. But then again the public should have really picked up those phones to get out the boring bastards.

Abhorsen · 21-08-2010, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PantherBlack

BB voters, well, what can I say, your idiocy was confirmed during last nights evictions.

Bar Steve, (the only good choice to be evicted because he didn't do anything interesting in the house apart from one argument with Ben about warfare), you messed up.

All of the 'safe' housemates like Mario, JJ and Andrew should have been the evicted ones!

John James, Sam and Corin have provided arguments and they should have stayed.

Shame on you pathetic voters for being the cretinous morons you really are. You wouldn't know entertainment if it bit you on the arse

RLMAO.

Get over it, your faves have gone.

The best HMs stayed in, Dave, Mario and Andrew and the trash was thrown out - Sam and John James - now they can go get a room together. LOL. The only one who should have stayed that didn't was Corin.

Abhorsen · 21-08-2010, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stonedape

The finalists are lame because it was vote to evict AND the public are predictable twats who always evict the more interesting option near finals. Enough blame to go around for the producers and the public.

RLMAO.

It is so funny watching all the John James and Sam fans whinge all over the place.

John James and Sam fans =

Abhorsen · 21-08-2010, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PantherBlack

What are you on about? Sam brought loads of arguments in the house, aka he provided TV Gold! You don't understand good TV.

Did you actually read that before you posted it? Really?

PantherBlack · 21-08-2010, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barbie

I agree, if ever we have had a wipeout of entertaining housemates, its now (except Steve). The public never learns and i blame it on being vote to evict. The producers could have stopped this happening with vote to save.

They could have stopped it by scrapping evictions altogether. Replacing them with mean tasks would have been better, i.e. vote to send (housemate's name) to the punishment chamber where they have to slag off their housemates to the camera, all the while the housemates are watching them, or show everyone their nominations etc etc.

PantherBlack · 21-08-2010, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shiner

It's not the public's fault. Blame the producers for engineering a predictable outcome. A vote to evict when all HMs (bar the golden girl) were up will only see the controversial/entertaining ones eliminated first.

I blame both the producers and the public. Read my above post to see what they COULD have implemented.

PantherBlack · 21-08-2010, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stonedape

the public are predictable twats who always evict the more interesting option near finals. Enough blame to go around for the producers and the public.

^ agreed.

PantherBlack · 21-08-2010, 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abhorsen

Did you actually read that before you posted it? Really?

^ NON fan alert. NON fan alert!

alc09 · 21-08-2010, 05:56 PM

Who ever went, the final would still have a poor line up as it's the worst set of HMs in the history of the show.

stonedape · 21-08-2010, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abhorsen

RLMAO.

It is so funny watching all the John James and Sam fans whinge all over the place.

John James and Sam fans =

I wish I could say the same about the one person who's so deluded they thought the result last night was good for the show. But it's not that funny. There's a reason no ones agreeing with you.

Shiner · 21-08-2010, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stonedape

I wish I could say the same about the one person who's so deluded they thought the result last night was good for the show. But it's not that funny. There's a reason no ones agreeing with you.

Sorry Abhorsen but...

Jack_ · 21-08-2010, 06:23 PM

I agree. Then again, they've always been like this. We should've learnt by now that none of them possess any sort of ****ing intelligence.

Just clueless.

luminoussun · 21-08-2010, 07:22 PM

I believe it was done to make sure mario got to the finale.
I think he has been fixed the whole program and has played a gay rachel rice role

Captain.Remy · 21-08-2010, 07:31 PM

and people are still surprised we evict the entertaining ones, it's been like that for 10 years, it wasn't going to change.
John James was too much of a ***** to get to the end, he wasn't even a good entertaining, he was a whining bitch.
I'm very surprised at Sam's eviction, I honestly thought he could have been a bit of a competition to Josie (he'd have eventually ended as first runner-up).
Not surprised about Corin (the usual jealous girls vote) and Steve.

Site Navigation

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com