ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Max Clifford Guilty Verdict from 1966 to 1985 : 8 years in prison (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=224091)

arista 26-04-2013 05:46 PM

Max Clifford Guilty Verdict from 1966 to 1985 : 8 years in prison
 
Breaking News

Was just on BBC London Live News


28th of May
he goes to court.


Max has said these are false assault claims
of course.

Nedusa 26-04-2013 05:54 PM

He needs a publicist to put over his side of the story... Wonder who he'll use ??

Kazanne 26-04-2013 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 5953953)
Breaking News

Was just on BBC London Live News


28th of May
he goes to court.


Max has said these are false assault claims
of course.

Just seen this arista ,are you shocked?

arista 26-04-2013 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 5953959)
Just seen this arista ,are you shocked?


On SkyNewsHD now. And Ch4News Live now





Yes I thought Max was a Good Guy

arista 26-04-2013 06:08 PM

1 girl aged 14 in 1966
1 women aged 18 on 1974/75
3 girl aged 15 in 1977/78
1 women aged 19 in 1978
2 girl aged 16 or 17 in 1981/82
1 women aged 19 in 1980/81
2 women aged 18 in 1984/85


From Ch4News

Kazanne 26-04-2013 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 5953965)
1 girl aged 14 in 1966
1 women aged 18 on 1974/75
3 girl agewd 15 in 1977/78
1 women aged 19 in 1978
2 girl aged 16 or 17 in 1981/82
1 women aged 19 in 1980/81
2 women aged 18 in 1984/85


From Ch4News

Oh dear,he has been busy.if it's true:puzzled:

arista 26-04-2013 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 5953969)
Oh dear,he has been busy.if it's true:puzzled:



Yes Ch4News asked him to go live
but he said he was to tired after the police session

Vanessa 26-04-2013 06:16 PM

I've never liked him, but i didn't expect this! :eek:

Nedusa 26-04-2013 06:25 PM

The first case of underage sexual misconduct/indecent assault was back in 1977/78 over 35 years ago. With the best will in the world I cannot see how any sort of meaningful trial could proceed with such a long time gap.

I have mixed feelings about these current celeb sex abuse claims. Whilst I recognise the CPS would not bring charges without the realistic prospect of a conviction , I struggle to see given the huge amount of time that has passed how any solid conviction could possibly be obtained.

Why did none of these girls/woman ever come forward thirty, twenty, ten or five years ago...????

MTVN 26-04-2013 06:25 PM

He's always been a bit of a dodgy geezer

Patrick 26-04-2013 06:37 PM

Shocked. The bloke always seemed like a nice guy.

Never the less, I'm fed up hearing about these 'scandals' now - the Jimmy Saville story got boring very quickly, now it's simply Police and the Press going around any old celebrity they think is 'abit dodgy' - and either hoping some attention seeking *****, will make a statement claiming they were assaulted by them in the 70s, as if it's at all relevant now - or the Police will try their hardest to find someone willing to 'confess' to being touched by a man.

It's pathetic now. Just let it go. If the girls were in that much distress they would of ******ing came forward decades ago, they don't need Police and the Media all over the show, squeezing them like a lemon, for some sort of juicy X-Rated gossip about Max Clifford's cock.

arista 26-04-2013 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nedusa (Post 5953980)
The first case of underage sexual misconduct/indecent assault was back in 1977/78 over 35 years ago. With the best will in the world I cannot see how any sort of meaningful trial could proceed with such a long time gap.

I have mixed feelings about these current celeb sex abuse claims. Whilst I recognise the CPS would not bring charges without the realistic prospect of a conviction , I struggle to see given the huge amount of time that has passed how any solid conviction could possibly be obtained.

Why did none of these girls/woman ever come forward thirty, twenty, ten or five years ago...????

Because they may have thought no one would trust there words

Nedusa 26-04-2013 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 5954000)
Because they may have thought no one would trust there words

Really...??? Surely 35 years ago Max Clifford was just another aspiring wannabe celeb type, not famous at all so why would any woman/ girl who had been assaulted by him not come forward immediately ??

joeysteele 26-04-2013 07:04 PM

Like Nedusa I wonder at all the people no saying anything at the time that were the victims or involved.

I guess though since the Police have been looking at Saville and others that likely many names have been given as also doing these acts.
Really,nothing now surprises me as to the names of 'celebrities' suspected or investigated and charged from decades ago though.

Kazanne 26-04-2013 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 5954017)
Like Nedusa I wonder at all the people no saying anything at the time that were the victims or involved.

I guess though since the Police have been looking at Saville and others that likely many names have been given as also doing these acts.
Really,nothing now surprises me as to the names of 'celebrities' suspected or investigated and charged from decades ago though.

Some surprising names in there Joey,Rolf harris being one of them,their careers are ruined whether they are guilty or not.

Mystic Mock 26-04-2013 07:19 PM

Tbh I've always thought that Max Clifford was a bit dodgy so I wouldn't be surprised if his guilty.

And how many of these guys gonna keep being suspected of raping young girls in the past? It's getting quite disturbing how The Police never suspected anything back then.

Jack_ 26-04-2013 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Mockinator (Post 5954029)
It's getting quite disturbing how The Police never suspected anything back then.

Ah come on Mock that's a bit unfair, Sting was a very busy man at the time

joeysteele 26-04-2013 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 5954018)
Some surprising names in there Joey,Rolf harris being one of them,their careers are ruined whether they are guilty or not.

I am still completely stunned Kazanne that Rolf Harris is even suspected, that is a massive shocker if it is really true, apparantly his is just a single allegation at this time. I really hope it is wrong.

Mystic Mock 26-04-2013 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 5954033)
Ah come on Mock that's a bit unfair, Sting was a very busy man at the time

:joker:

Very good Jack.

Livia 26-04-2013 07:54 PM

I'm with Nedusa on this one.

Having said that... although he's brilliant at what he does, Max Clifford is an odious individual. Of course being odious isn't against the law, unfortunately.

joeysteele 26-04-2013 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 5954033)
Ah come on Mock that's a bit unfair, Sting was a very busy man at the time

:joker: That was really good and quick Jack.

arista 26-04-2013 08:11 PM

http://news.sky.com/story/1083538/ma...1-sex-assaults


http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/ap...decent-assault

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...t-assault.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ile-abuse.html

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/...66_306x527.jpg
Today talking to the Media

Suze 26-04-2013 08:14 PM

I have never really liked him, but that doesn't mean I am apt to believe any or some of the stuff against him or the few others they have been looking into. Anyway, did he suddenly stop all the activity in 85' then? I have no idea what is or isn't true anyway with the names coming out in it all. So many that I can't help that feel there is some bandwagon jumping in amongst the allegations and a few truths maybe.

King Gizzard 26-04-2013 08:18 PM

Not particularly shocked, not that I thought he'd be capable of stuff like this, but he always seemed quite slimey

Z 26-04-2013 08:31 PM

I do agree that coming forward several decades later seems a bit dodgy, but then again, I've technically been the victim of a sexual assault. Sexual assault isn't always a life ruining rapist attacking a victim in public, or a creepy uncle abusing his family connections. In my case, I was very drunk and was forced to do things that I would never have agreed to do in a sober frame of mind with the person who forced themselves upon me. I'm no worse off for the experience - I was very drunk at the time and I can only remember sketchy details, but I later found out from other people that there had been some bragging about what had happened so other people knew what had gone on. As mad as it sounds, I don't want to ruin someone else's life over something that could well have just been a drunken mistake. They might never do that ever again in their lives. I'm not in need of surgery or therapy over the incident, I don't want to ruin someone else's life over something like that...

However, if, some time down the line, I heard that this person was being taken to court over sexual assault, I would seriously reconsider my position on the matter. That, I imagine, is how these situations come to be. Lots of victims who don't necessarily feel victimised, thinking they are isolated incidents. Perhaps they're even friends with the person who committed the assault. I sometimes see the person who assaulted me socially and I don't harbour any ill will towards them. These things can be incredibly complex...


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.