No handcuffs in bed then?
 

I guess they are allowed to remove the handcuffs when in bed then because Luisa was laying in bed with her arm up and it had no handcuffs on it :shrug:

Not that I think it's a bad thing infact I know I would be going mental having to be handcuffed to someone I barely knew all night in bed.

They'd be waking up with their hands in all kinds of places otherwise

I think so cause a video I saw earlier Evander said he went to the toilet and when he came back Luisa was on the floor :joker:

Yep,Accidental "finger banging" would be a nightmare BB would not want to deal with.lol

Why do the production team treat the viewers like imbeciles?
It was obvious from the beginning that they would not be handcuffed 24/7
and the mere fact that the handcuffs go from 6" to 6feet at the shower shows that they do think the viewers will accept anything they say.

Marcus pointed out at the beginning of the highlights that handcuffs would extend to let the housemates have a little privacy in the bathroom etc.

They did say they were extended in tonight's HL's and you still have to be around the same person so it still can't be fun

Did he indeed! and how do they manage that? it is not like a dog lead as was stated on another thread , otherwise they'd just let them "extend" as they (the handcuffed) wished or are they remotely controlled? No Live feed no trust in the production company!

> http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=243386

Spring loaded chains on the handcuffs? :elephant::dance::elephant: :hugesmile: :joker: :devil::nono:

Maybe they gave them extentions?

Maybe they don't want the viewers to see how they do it?

Why would they even bother telling us that they longer chains on them then?

Maybe because we can see the difference?

What's your theory then fingers, they are constantly being told to put their handcuffs either off or on depending on when they feel like filming something they want to air?

The housemates were probably given a set of rules (not aired on screen) and told they can only use the extender while washing, going to the toilet or for the diary room - then if they use the extenders any time outside of those rules then they will be punished.

No need to really show the viewers that. We all have eyes, I'm sure most of us can work out what is going on!

If you're not being facetious , then something like that, unless you are privy to the production room schemes?

Not really Reality TV, then?

Lets face it they were never going to be cuffed in bed, though why we were told there was a 10 minute window for them to get their PJs on is a bit of a mystery, i think most people would have accepted them being unchained going to bed!

How does them being allowed to have some privacy for carrying out intimate tasks translate into not being reality TV?

At least I'm not the only one

Eh? It's called privacy. You know, some people like to shower naked without a stranger...

That is not what I said or implied, just carry on believing what you see. I will not post on this subject again.

And what does 24/7 mean?

It was what you said though fingers, we were having a discussion and I wondered how you came to that conclusion, if you don't want to explain that then fair enough.

It's probably a safety issue, it could be possible to get constricted by the cord if one person in the pair is an active sleeper. Unlikely, but possible.