Do you agree with sticking five up?
 

Despite only two receiving the most nominations?

Well it was Liz and Jim who received the highest nominations, then Evander, Jazmine and Lusia tied for the third most, so yeah, it's fine.

Vote To Save should always have 3+ up, otherwise it's just a reverse VTE, as proven in the past.

Selfishly...No.

I think there is more of a chance of Jasmine or Luisa going now :(

would rather it was just Jim vs. Liz, yeah.

No, it should be the two or more with the most nominations, if everyone only got two then fair enough, but really Evander and whoever the other one was who only got two Noms shouldn't be up :shrug:

Agreed, kind of beats the concept, might as well follow the IAC format

I think the twist means they need more up this week.

They have to have at least 3 up so they can save one and reopen the lines and the hoo har that has gone on in the past when 2big characters went head to head I think this is better

The other one with two nom's was Jasmine :notimpressed:

It should have been Jim/Liz/Luisa up.

3 were up Cherie

5 nom's each for Liz and Jim and 3 for Luisa.

I honestly don't get why you guys are complaining. More people up means more chance of getting rid of the dull ones. A 2 person VTS is just a reverse VTE (see BB13 for examples).

VTS and the 3 or more with the highest number of noms is perfect. Hope C5 never change this format again.

But dull people are rarely placed up for eviction

Noo cus it gives Luisa an excuse for being up. If it had been only three up and she was one of them, then she'd be more paranoid. It would have been nice to see her squirm.

Oh ... They did the 2 or more moms in the summer too I think the more up the better

Haven't seen tonight's yet, but I saw the title of this thread and thought Jasmine had been talking about her sex life again.

I'm glad they're doing the 3 or more with a vote to Save, it's the best way to have the voting system imo, I just wish they'd do it for the civilian series

Stickling up 5....Are we not sick of talking about lee yet.

Yes I did laugh at the title :laugh: sorry

same here lol

I think it makes it more interesting.

Its stupid ,I said so when they first started doing this, its all for money

I guess I wouldn't have a problem with it if there were at least consistent rules, but the rules for how nominations are counted and how many people go up seem to change from week to week so it's ridiculous at this point.

yes, I think there should always be more than 2 up or else it essentially turns into a vote to evict and the 'nice' one stays over the entertaining one.

Yes I agree.

I myself am not too happy that it only takes 2 noms to have someone up for eviction, I would prefer the minimum amount of noms to be 3.
I do like more housemates up however and would always prefer to see 3 or more up every week.