FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
09-01-2014, 08:53 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
-
|
Despite only two receiving the most nominations?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 08:55 PM | #2 | |||
|
||||
Inactive
|
Well it was Liz and Jim who received the highest nominations, then Evander, Jazmine and Lusia tied for the third most, so yeah, it's fine.
Vote To Save should always have 3+ up, otherwise it's just a reverse VTE, as proven in the past.
__________________
Last edited by Headie; 09-01-2014 at 09:05 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 08:55 PM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Too glam to give a damn
|
Selfishly...No.
I think there is more of a chance of Jasmine or Luisa going now
__________________
Last edited by Braden; 09-01-2014 at 08:59 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 08:56 PM | #4 | |||
|
||||
Ż\_(ツ)_/Ż
|
would rather it was just Jim vs. Liz, yeah.
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 08:56 PM | #5 | |||
|
||||
IntoxiKated
|
No, it should be the two or more with the most nominations, if everyone only got two then fair enough, but really Evander and whoever the other one was who only got two Noms shouldn't be up
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 08:57 PM | #6 | |||
|
||||
-
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 08:59 PM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I think the twist means they need more up this week.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 08:59 PM | #8 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
They have to have at least 3 up so they can save one and reopen the lines and the hoo har that has gone on in the past when 2big characters went head to head I think this is better
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 09:02 PM | #9 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
It should have been Jim/Liz/Luisa up. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 09:04 PM | #10 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 09:07 PM | #11 | |||
|
||||
Inactive
|
I honestly don't get why you guys are complaining. More people up means more chance of getting rid of the dull ones. A 2 person VTS is just a reverse VTE (see BB13 for examples).
VTS and the 3 or more with the highest number of noms is perfect. Hope C5 never change this format again.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 09:08 PM | #12 | |||
|
||||
-
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 09:08 PM | #13 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
Noo cus it gives Luisa an excuse for being up. If it had been only three up and she was one of them, then she'd be more paranoid. It would have been nice to see her squirm.
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 09:10 PM | #14 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Oh ... They did the 2 or more moms in the summer too I think the more up the better
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 09:11 PM | #15 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Haven't seen tonight's yet, but I saw the title of this thread and thought Jasmine had been talking about her sex life again.
__________________
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhuser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 09:12 PM | #16 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
I'm glad they're doing the 3 or more with a vote to Save, it's the best way to have the voting system imo, I just wish they'd do it for the civilian series
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 09:19 PM | #17 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Stickling up 5....Are we not sick of talking about lee yet.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 09:22 PM | #18 | |||
|
||||
nope
|
Yes I did laugh at the title sorry
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 09:22 PM | #19 | |||
|
||||
mizzy25
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 09:27 PM | #20 | |||
|
||||
BB Sees All 👀
|
I think it makes it more interesting.
__________________
Thanks to Littlegreen for my lovely sig |
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 09:28 PM | #21 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Its stupid ,I said so when they first started doing this, its all for money
|
||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 09:29 PM | #22 | |||
|
||||
As Told by Troy
|
I guess I wouldn't have a problem with it if there were at least consistent rules, but the rules for how nominations are counted and how many people go up seem to change from week to week so it's ridiculous at this point.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 10:14 PM | #23 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
yes, I think there should always be more than 2 up or else it essentially turns into a vote to evict and the 'nice' one stays over the entertaining one.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 11:14 PM | #24 | |||
|
||||
Z
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
09-01-2014, 11:22 PM | #25 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
I myself am not too happy that it only takes 2 noms to have someone up for eviction, I would prefer the minimum amount of noms to be 3.
I do like more housemates up however and would always prefer to see 3 or more up every week. |
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|