Vote to Save?
 

A little thought i had.

If we had to vote to save rather than to Evict - Could it make the show more interesting? Less Interesting? Or would it change a lot?

The reason i ask is 'I'm a Celeb' has Save voting and there have been so many shocks and surprises in the Evictions, some good and some bad. Would it have the same effect on BB? The 'I'm a Celeb' voting usually means we see the less entertaining characters voted out early e.g Mike Read, Tommy Cannon and Chris Bisson.

I would love to have seen the outcome of some of the Evictions had to vote been to save - like Sezer's, Lisa's, Mikey/Susie's and Nikki's.

We have had Save voting before like in CBB3. It had the same outcome as the polls predicted had it been a Evict vote so had no effect, same with the Michael/Spirals eviction in Week 10 of BB7.

Maybe for CBB5 we should try the Aussie voting. This year in Australia they introduced a new voting system. Viewers could vote to Save and Evict. When the votes closed all the save votes were deducted from a housemates evict votes leaving us with a merged vote.

I think vote to save is best!
Nikki wouldnt have gone!

Yeah vote to save is better! Get the boring ones out. And voting to save is nicer anyways. People voting would be a nice thing!

i like the voting to evict personally

BTW bb4eva i love your Davina sig!

I would have voted for everyone else just to see Nikki gone.

Me too Red!!!

Naah...I like voting to evict!!!!!!!

Vote to evict's better, I think. The public has more control over who goes.

i also think that :xyxwave:

I think it would be better to vote to save, then we wouldn't loose housemate's like Science and Victor. But also vote to evict is better then we get rid of annoying housemate's like Nikki.

im not sure because people like suzie would have gone earlier but vote to evict gets rid of the ones you dont like as well im half between both