Why doesn't Winston just give us a straight answer?
 

He starts rambling on about stuff that has nothing to do with it.

I agree with Winston so what is it you want an answer to?

that's why Emma got frustrated with him, he never gives straight answers or explains things.. he brings up irrelevant stuff

A common reaction from someone who doesn't know what they're talking about

Because he knows that his views are awful, so will just say anything in the hope that people back off.

:clap1:

Ok for those who agree with Winston maybe you can answer the question - why is it abuse for a same sex couple to adopt? Please be specific and highlight why exactly it would be abuse.

Because you are deliberately, with forethought, putting a child in a home without a mother.

How the **** can that be a good thing?

Because y'all can't handle the truth. (his truth)

I don't see an issue so please explain why its bad?

I'm going to enjoy this.

Hello Thrice, so what part of Gay adoption is child abuse? Thats what I really want to know, what part of children being scared, hurt, injured and tormented physically and mentally is comparable to putting them in a house with two loving parents?

For someone so against the gays he sure can't give a straight answer :shrug:

Gay mafia does not allow any other point of view.

*arranges for a unicorn head on Paul's pillow*

Why does he have to? He does not need to justify his view on gay adoption to anyone on this show. He explained himself. People didnt like his answer. There is NOTHING he can say on the subject that people will like so why even bother?

his view on gay adoption is irrelevant to this show so thats quite fitting

Do you think a child having no mum is healthy? Would you deliberately put a child into such a situation?

I keep hearing that everyone has the right to have children. The fact is that that is a selfish view. Children have the right to a mother.

Its polite to answer a questions when asked. Especially as when asked if he stood by what he said. he said as I recall 'Hell Yes' If he's that adamant he should be able to explain why he takes this stance.

Just because someone is female doesn't make them a perfect mother, i can think of a lot of child abuse cases where mothers have been the spawn of satan (and i'm not religious).

Just as long as a child has caring parents whether they be a gay couple, a single parent, or those with religious beliefs, as long as the child will be loved and cared for in a secure and loving home, what does it really matter?

They don't have a mother in a care home either. And as someone who knows a gay man who's adopted a child, I can assure you that there is plenty of 'forethought'. No one just wakes up one day and says 'I think I'll adopt a kid today, and yipee i'm gay so they won't have a mum'. Life's not a fairy tale mate, and any child in care would be lucky to have a loving home to go to, regardless of how many parents and what gender/sexual orientation they are.

But the children in care who would be adopted have no parents. It is selfish of you to deny children a loving home.

Its certainly not unhealthy? What about all those hundreds of people who have abusive mothers who beat up their children? Two dads and two mums can do just as good as a job as a man and a woman, its the person inside not the persons identity.

Its not a selfish view at all, providing people have one loving parent, that is fine for me.