![]() |
John "We Need To Name and Shame"
He said this about the knickers :umm2:
|
He also, without a hint of irony said to Tiff 'I would never try to humiliate a young girl' when she confronted him about knickergate. :umm2:
|
She's a filthbag but John was loving being pack leader there.Got him abit of the attention he so badly craves.
|
He completely denied it....he instigated the whole thing...LIAR!
PLAY IT...TO TIFF...:cheer2: |
These are EXACTLY the same tactics the odious rodent employed when, BEHIND HER BACK as she sat alone in the garden, HE instigated most of the trouble against Tiffany and implored the others listening in the group to ostracize her and isolate her, only to then go to Tiffany and say; "THEY have said" and "THEY have decided", and THEY asked me to tell you".
They are ALL a bunch of two-faced, spineless and spoilt cry-babies, but King Rat John is THE Master Manipulator. Queen Gemma is his female counterpart. |
Chris, Darren or Scotty to win. None of the three have really been active in the house, but those three are the least offensive of all the inmates.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Spoiler: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I had no idea what he and Tiffany were talking about on LF but I do remember him looking at Tiff and saying how wrong she was to think he was the type of person to humiliate a young girl.....really disappoited with his name and shame comment.
|
Quote:
|
yes john used those words but all other HMs were slagging steph off to varying degrees. john said that also before it was known whos knickers they were. the 3 girls were slagging steph off abt knickergate. they were the worst culprits so why is john gettin all the stick for simply sayin 'name & shame'. it is disgusting anyway to leave dirty underwear lying around for all to see & on a table were someone might put a plate down with food on. thats why he said that, its disgusting leaving soiled knickers on a table for all to see, think hygiene
|
Quote:
|
Yep he's a nasty piece of work
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
David was ill in the house for one. Nothing soiled in any way should be left anywhere were anyone else can come across them. There are few general things that I would make a great fuss about but this whether it be womens or mens effects is one of them. Stephanie when they first asked,denied they were hers, had she gone out and took responsibility right off, there may have been no reason for the greater fuss that came about. Name and shame indeed should have been done,she should be thoroughly ashamed and in fact disgusted with herself. Even moreso to let Jeremy go and wash them, all she had to do was wash then when she changed clothing. This is all her fault and no one elses. Maybe that naming and shaming will make her think before ever doing such a filthy and disgusting thing again where other people are. Had I ever found anything like that,I'd have been furious with the eventually identified culprit. |
Why are people surprised? The man has shown these evil tendencies right from the beginning. Look how he demanded everybody leave the house in protest if Tiffany doesn't leave.
He has to be the most vile housemate they have ever had. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
How did they identify them as Steph's?
Did they run a DNA test? A sniffing test? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.