Ingrid Seward, Dickie Arbiter and others caught lying about the Oprah interview.
 

Royal Correspondents Dickie Arbiter, Victoria Arbiter, Ingrid Seward and Richard Fitzwilliams have all been caught reviewing the Oprah interview, before they’ve seen it or know the contents of it.



Don’t get how any of these 4 can ever be taken seriously again after being caught lying.

This is the problem with "experts" on tv

most are self-proclaimed and money-grabbing charlatans

It’s interesting to see that they’d lie for a pay day, I sadly doubt it’ll have any impact on their reputations, but none of them should be labelled an expert ever again.

you watch they will all be on the tv next week

Those people quoted are all Royal correspondents that Jet has quoted in the past as being very well informed. Now they are "experts" who just want to be on tv?

[QUOTE=jet;10785628]Reactions of respected people who have known the royals for many years.

Ingrid Seward, editor in chief of Majesty Magazine:
“It appears to be a gratuitous and ungracious swipe at the Queen.”

Angela Levin, Harry’s official Biographer:
I fear she has put a sliver of ice in Harry’s heart.

Tom Bower, Charles’s Biographer:
Their comments smack of spiteful fury. I fear it will get worse.

Dickie Arbiter, former spokesman for the Queen:
Harry knows the rules. Meghan knows the rules. It’s been made very clear to them.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
“They didn’t get what they wanted. They are clearly not happy and there is a hint of suppressed rage.

Angela Levin, Harry’s Biographer:
Harry and Meghan are almost stumbling in their rush to join a world of rich, self - centred celebrities.

Penny Junor, Royal Biographer and friend of Prince Charles:
I’m worried about Prince Harry….I fear something is seriously amiss and he’s on a trajectory of self destruction.

Mmmm :suspect:

[QUOTE=AnnieK;11011644]Those people quoted are all Royal correspondents that Jet has quoted in the past as being very well informed. Now they are "experts" who just want to be on tv?

im not jet

take it up with him

and i dont think any of the 3 are or have ever been royal correspondents

:shrug:

and all 3 have have known the royals for many years

its not in doubt.

Well well well

i would add I do think after they have watched the interview the same conclusions will probably be drawn by them and the watching public...

:skull:

Anything they say will be met with negativity regardless. That’s what irrational hatred creates.

They're just saying whatever will bring in the most clicks and people who are too warped by their own confirmation bias will confuse it for fact because it suits their narrative. These 'experts' don't know jack**** and are just telling the gullible what they want to hear.

There’s no doubt they have known the royals, but they have thrown away any credibility they had with this interview imo, how can they be trusted when they’re so willing to lie.

Who are the two blokes asking the questions?

Two YouTubers, they’ve previously done videos on Katie Hopkins, Carole Baskin and others.

to be fair to them

they are talking to 2 unknown wee youtube laddies who they think are mug punter enough to pay them


would they have done this for the BBC/Times/ITV?

no

Does that mean they are not knobs

no

and dont forget we have the actual "interview" pretending to be an actual interview and most people will lap it up as if it is a real interview

that is a whole hill of beans worse


:skull:

So, maybe Im not getting this....but when these two You Tubers asks questions about their comments on William and Meghans love of Animals...have they just made that up?

They asked a very specific question there about something that is allegedly said about William? Were they briefed about what the interview contained before hand as it doesn’t look like they went into the questions cold? Would they have answered that question without knowing what was supposed to have been said :laugh:

I never heard of any of these apart from the Majesty Editor woman :smug:

Have you watched the video? They asked them if they had seen the interview, they said no. They asked them to comment on the interview anyway and fed them bits that they said meghan mentioned in the interview. The two lads have not seen the interview either, but the respected journalists lied to make it look like they had. Thus proving that they will spin anything to suit the narrative they want to push it (as any journalist does).

To be honest if they had integrity, they wouldn't and shouldn't have answered any questions without seeing it first.

I had only heard of them as Jet has quoted them before. I wouldn't have known any of them otherwise :laugh: Then again I probably couldn't name many journalists apart from the news readers :worry:

They are not "respected journalists"

One is a niche magazine editor and the others are television and radio commentators

Hmmm, very odd and well, I agree, very unprofessional indeed if they haven't had previews of the interview. I don’t know who Richard Fitzwilliams is or Victoria whoever either.

The one I’m surprised at is Ingrid Seward, the editor of Majesty magazine . Dickie Arbiter was press secretary to the Queen years ago.
On the other hand, it doesn't mean that the opinions of those 2 I know of, past or future, are not worth listening to. Because they can still have informed opinions. But they are not, and never have been, royal commentators or reporters. :shrug:

I’d be much more surprised if those who have links and access to royal sources, like Jennie Bond or Richard Kay, for instance, did this.

CNN have got egg on their face..

:hehe:

Jenny Bond would never