ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   200-acre North Hampshire solar farm met with backlash by Nimby locals (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=380127)

arista 20-03-2022 09:38 AM

200-acre North Hampshire solar farm met with backlash by Nimby locals
 
[Plans to build a huge solar farm in
North Hampshire,
capable of powering 17,000 homes,
are facing opposition from local residents.
Enso Energy has submitted plans to build
the 200-acre farm on land between Silchester
and Bramley which, if built, would be
the size of 140 football pitches.

According to the energy company,
the farm would take 25,000 tonnes
of carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere
every year – an equivalent reduction
of 8,000 cars on the road – and supply
almost 50MW of clean renewable
electricity to the National Grid.]




Why moan at essential
Power we need.



https://www.newburytoday.co.uk/news/...ocals-9194399/

glib 20-03-2022 09:43 AM

140 football pitches is a lot

Oliver_W 20-03-2022 09:59 AM

Wasting that green space for a solar farm in England is a bit stupid.

arista 20-03-2022 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 11147766)
Wasting that green space for a solar farm in England is a bit stupid.



You are Wrong
that is Electric power to a whole county - that is Essential
They are Fields doing nothing,




China has the biggest Solar Farm in the world
it has some pig farmers under them.

Kizzy 20-03-2022 12:37 PM

I don't agree either... which may be surprising.

Putting those on existing structures and using the land for housing would be a better use of the space if it's availiable.

Oliver_W 20-03-2022 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 11147781)
They are Fields doing nothing,

Being 200 acres of green space is what they're doing, and that's worth a lot more than some numbers on a screen.

If they have the money and resources to do put the panels over the fields, they can put them on roofs.

arista 20-03-2022 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 11147802)
Being 200 acres of green space is what they're doing, and that's worth a lot more than some numbers on a screen.

If they have the money and resources to do put the panels over the fields, they can put them on roofs.


No putting on roofs costs much more.


Solar FARMS are Great
That green space is not being used


It is our Future

arista 20-03-2022 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 11147801)
I don't agree either... which may be surprising.

Putting those on existing structures and using the land for housing would be a better use of the space if it's available.



No new housing needs Electric Power
from this New Big Solar Farm



Kizzy a Nimby



Shocking

Oliver_W 20-03-2022 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 11147807)
No putting on roofs costs much more.


Solar FARMS are Great
That green space is not being used


It is our Future

The green space is being used - it's green space.

While brownfields sites still exist, there is no excuse for destroying the countryside, especially for something as barely-useful as solar.

Toy Soldier 20-03-2022 12:54 PM

"an equivalent reduction of 8,000 cars on the road"

:facepalm: the phrase "piss in the ocean" comes to mind - there are nearly 40 million registered vehicles on the road in the UK and you can easily assume 15-20 million actively on the road regularly. "8000 cars" is nothing.

arista 20-03-2022 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 11147812)
The green space is being used - it's green space.

While brownfields sites still exist, there is no excuse for destroying the countryside, especially for something as barely-useful as solar.


It is wasted Green Space

This Location is Ideal
for Electric connections to the grid


This should go Front Page
when it gets approved

Oliver_W 20-03-2022 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 11147817)
wasted Green Space

Contradiction of terms.

Kizzy 20-03-2022 01:12 PM

Why greenfield and not brown?... it makes no sense.
Unless it's seen by landowners as the soft option. They then don't have to commit to the more pernanant changes of agriculture or urbanisation.

arista 20-03-2022 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 11147827)
Why greenfield and not brown?... it makes no sense.
Unless it's seen by landowners as the soft option. They then don't have to commit to the more pernanant changes of agriculture or urbanisation.



They may do one
a brownfield zone


This massive Solar farm
is perfect there
and a supply that will be used right away.

bitontheslide 20-03-2022 01:27 PM

they need to be more imaginative in how they locate solar panels. Using green field sites is wrong

Kizzy 20-03-2022 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 11147810)
No new housing needs Electric Power
from this New Big Solar Farm



Kizzy a Nimby



Shocking

It's not in my back yard so that's not my concern, I just don't see the point.

arista 21-04-2022 06:27 AM

The council last night
Refused this plan.

[Bramley solar farm plan rejected
by Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council
A plan to build a solar farm on land equivalent
to the size of 100 football pitches has been refused.

The company behind the project planned for
Bramley, Hampshire, said it would have
provided enough energy to power 11,700 family homes.

About 680 people formally said they
were opposed to it going ahead.

Councillors rejected it on the grounds
of the impact on the public right of way
and hampering exploration of the
area's Roman history.
The proposed development at
Minchens Lane - known as Bramley Frith - would have
been operational for up to 40 years
and span 85 hectares (210 acres) of agricultural land.]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...shire-61170550

bitontheslide 21-04-2022 06:56 AM

good

Cherie 21-04-2022 07:09 AM

Glad this got the heave ho what about the wildlife and plants
, plenty existing roofs to put panels on...do that

Toy Soldier 21-04-2022 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 11147835)
they need to be more imaginative in how they locate solar panels. Using green field sites is wrong

Really they should be fitting them to houses (for free) and then once costs are covered, the houses they're on should only pay a nominal fee for network maintenance (say £20 a month or something like that).

They won't do that though, not enough £££ in it.

bitontheslide 21-04-2022 08:48 AM

they could attach solar panels on apartment blocks etc, where they could genuinely make a difference and not interfere with green space

Kizzy 21-04-2022 10:10 AM

I've seen ads for amazon where they are boasting of their 'green' energy solar farms. It powers only their operations it suggests in the ad. It's a shame everyone can't afford to buy huge swathes of land to go off grid!
Similarly with macdonalds their ad explains how their oil powers their trucks.. neatly bypassing the tax the rest of us pay on fuel.

arista 21-04-2022 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 11156007)
Glad this got the heave ho what about the wildlife and plants
, plenty existing roofs to put panels on...do that


No Cherie
that is not for this project
they will need to find another large area.

Kizzy 21-04-2022 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 11156059)
No Cherie
that is not for this project
they will need to find another large area.

As has been said brownfield not agricultural land is ideal there must be plenty of that in the UK?

bitontheslide 21-04-2022 10:57 AM

arista doesnt want to admit he was wrong, so it's pointless kizzy :laugh:


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.