ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Fiona Bruce stepping back from her role as Refuge Charity (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=384590)

arista 13-03-2023 12:22 PM

Fiona Bruce stepping back from her role as Refuge Charity
 
Just on SkyNewsHD


https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/u...arity-26459672

Liam- 13-03-2023 12:23 PM

She should have been let go from it after her pathetic display

arista 13-03-2023 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam- (Post 11271526)
She should have been let go from it after her pathetic display


Her job is to point out the Facts.
That is what she did with Brute Stanley Johnson.

So viewers were updated

user104658 13-03-2023 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 11271529)
Her job is to point out the Facts.
That is what she did with Brute Stanley Johnson.

So viewers were updated

I understand her obligation to explain the "unencumbered" facts legally, but there was more info given than needed. Maybe someone was in here ear - I don't know - but consider this part;

Ms Bruce then said: “I’m not disputing what you’re saying, but just so everyone knows what this is referring to, Stanley Johnson’s wife spoke to a journalist, Tom Bower, and she said that Stanley Johnson had broken her nose and that she’d ended up in hospital as a result.

“Stanley Johnson has not commented publicly on that.


All of that part is fine to be said for context, and would have been ample, there's no need to say more than that. But there was one more part:

"Friends of his have said it did happen, but it was a one-off."

THIS is the part that's unecessary and minimising. It doesn't matter - at all - if it was "a one off" or not. It's a terrible thing to say about a domestic violence issue. Again I dunno if it came from her own thinking or someone in her ear and her just parrotting without thinking.

Crimson Dynamo 13-03-2023 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy (Post 11271530)
I understand her obligation to explain the "unencumbered" facts legally, but there was more info given than needed. Maybe someone was in here ear - I don't know - but consider this part;

Ms Bruce then said: “I’m not disputing what you’re saying, but just so everyone knows what this is referring to, Stanley Johnson’s wife spoke to a journalist, Tom Bower, and she said that Stanley Johnson had broken her nose and that she’d ended up in hospital as a result.

“Stanley Johnson has not commented publicly on that.


All of that part is fine to be said for context, and would have been ample, there's no need to say more than that. But there was one more part:

"Friends of his have said it did happen, but it was a one-off."

THIS is the part that's unecessary and minimising. It doesn't matter - at all - if it was "a one off" or not. It's a terrible thing to say about a domestic violence issue. Again I dunno if it came from her own thinking or someone in her ear and her just parrotting without thinking.

but he could have broken her nose by accident?

Or do we actually know he hit her specifically with intent?

user104658 13-03-2023 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11271533)
but he could have broken her nose by accident?

Or do we actually know he hit her specifically with intent?

I have a teapot for sale if you're interested LT, £100.

https://videos.metro.co.uk/pix/met/2...7706913004.jpg

It's an antique.

Crimson Dynamo 13-03-2023 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy (Post 11271537)
I have a teapot for sale if you're interested LT, £100.

https://videos.metro.co.uk/pix/met/2...7706913004.jpg

It's an antique.

Its actually a very important point to establish if you are going to go on tv and call someone a wife-beater

arista 13-03-2023 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11271533)
but he could have broken her nose by accident?

Or do we actually know he hit her specifically with intent?



It was not
she went to hospital

Crimson Dynamo 13-03-2023 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 11271541)
it was not
she went to hospital

you go to hospital in both scenarios tho

Crimson Dynamo 13-03-2023 01:00 PM

I have read on wiki that it was an allegation made by his ex wife as told to someone else who then made this public so I guess Mt Johnson could deny this happened?

user104658 13-03-2023 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11271539)
Its actually a very important point to establish if you are going to go on tv and call someone a wife-beater

He can go after the person who said it for defamation if he wants to - or his ex wife if he's so inclined for saying it to a journalist in the first place. Again all Bruce had to do was clarify the facts (that his ex wife apparently alleged it in a conversation with a journalist, and that he has declined to comment on it publicly). If he had ever flat out denied it she would have had to say "he has denied it". But he hasn't.

"Pals say it's true" is extra information that isn't needed, and "they say it was a one off" is information that isn't needed AND is irrelevant. "Err I am not a murderer, I only killed one person!!" is clearly not how it works - if he smacked her in the face once, he is a wife beater.

user104658 13-03-2023 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11271539)
Its actually a very important point to establish if you are going to go on tv and call someone a wife-beater

He can go after the person who said it for defamation if he wants to - or his ex wife if he's so inclined for saying it to a journalist in the first place. Again all Bruce had to do was clarify the facts (that his ex wife apparently alleged it in a conversation with a journalist, and that he has declined to comment on it publicly). If he had ever flat out denied it she would have had to say "he has denied it". But he hasn't.

"Pals say it's true" is extra information that isn't needed, and "they say it was a one off" is information that isn't needed AND is irrelevant. "Err I am not a murderer, I only killed one person!!" is clearly not how it works - if he smacked her in the face once, he is a wife beater.

Tom4784 13-03-2023 01:15 PM

Honestly, it just goes to show how broken the BBC is that the Gary Linekar situation went the way it did yet Fiona Bruce, the host of question time, can try to waive off domestic violence because it makes the tories look bad.

The Slim Reaper 13-03-2023 01:16 PM

Not sure if it was the same wife, but one of his ex wives has stated he hit her on the regular.

It is not likely to be a one off, and even if it was, I agree with TS on the minimising aspect of it.

Crimson Dynamo 13-03-2023 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper (Post 11271552)
Not sure if it was the same wife, but one of his ex wives has stated he hit her on the regular.

It is not likely to be a one off, and even if it was, I agree with TS on the minimising aspect of it.

Yes that is the same one that i read in wiki (who knows how reliable that is tbh)

user104658 13-03-2023 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom4784 (Post 11271551)
Honestly, it just goes to show how broken the BBC is that the Gary Linekar situation went the way it did yet Fiona Bruce, the host of question time, can try to waive off domestic violence because it makes the tories look bad.

I reckon it's worse than that, I don't think it was Fiona Bruce, I think she had a BBC exec literally in her ear. She repeats "...was required to say..." multiple times in that "apology", definitely came from higher up, probably came from a bloke but she'll take the full flak.

arista 13-03-2023 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper (Post 11271552)
Not sure if it was the same wife, but one of his ex wives has stated he hit her on the regular.

It is not likely to be a one off, and even if it was, I agree with TS on the minimising aspect of it.


https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/10...1753790593.jpg
Father Stanley and mother Charlotte.
Boris, centre, is pictured with his brother
and sisters in the seventies.
Mr Bower describes Stanley’s first marriage,
to Mr Johnson’s mother Charlotte,
as violent and unhappy,
quoting her as saying:
‘He broke my nose. He made me feel like I deserved it’



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-affairs.html

Alf 13-03-2023 01:20 PM

January 6 was a con job hoax.

America's government is locking up innocent citizens because they're political opponents.

Crimson Dynamo 13-03-2023 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy (Post 11271549)
He can go after the person who said it for defamation if he wants to - or his ex wife if he's so inclined for saying it to a journalist in the first place. Again all Bruce had to do was clarify the facts (that his ex wife apparently alleged it in a conversation with a journalist, and that he has declined to comment on it publicly). If he had ever flat out denied it she would have had to say "he has denied it". But he hasn't.

"Pals say it's true" is extra information that isn't needed, and "they say it was a one off" is information that isn't needed AND is irrelevant. "Err I am not a murderer, I only killed one person!!" is clearly not how it works - if he smacked her in the face once, he is a wife beater.

how would Fiona Bruce have all the facts tho?

arista 13-03-2023 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alf (Post 11271557)
January 6 was a con job hoax.

America's government is locking up innocent citizens because they're political opponents.


No Alf
they Broke in


Fact.

arista 13-03-2023 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11271558)
how would Fiona Bruce have all the facts tho?


It is from a Book.


It was in all press



Just posted a Link

user104658 13-03-2023 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 11271558)
how would Fiona Bruce have all the facts tho?

She wouldn't but all she had to say was that he hasn't commented on the allegation - people can draw whatever they want from that. I appreciate that legally the show couldn't say nothing at all - but she needed to say LESS not more, that's impartiality, and isn't that what all of this recent furor is about.

user104658 13-03-2023 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 11271555)
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/10...1753790593.jpg
Father Stanley and mother Charlotte.
Boris, centre, is pictured with his brother
and sisters in the seventies.
Mr Bower describes Stanley’s first marriage,
to Mr Johnson’s mother Charlotte,
as violent and unhappy,
quoting her as saying:
‘He broke my nose. He made me feel like I deserved it’



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-affairs.html

God he looks just like BoJo doesn't he. Those arsehole genes must be unfortunately strong ones.

The Slim Reaper 13-03-2023 01:24 PM

Is this real life :laugh:

Alf 13-03-2023 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 11271559)
No Alf
they Broke in


Fact.

You are fake news

Fact


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.