What if the house pictures were fakes??
 

what if the house pictures had been taken months ago, so as too lead us onto a false trail, and the house was totally different??

I don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture changes.

And by fakes i mean properly taken and then the house changed so that it is not the same now!!:wink:

well unless they somehow faked the aerial pics too.. then...

I doubt it. But if they were, I'd be mad!

I doubt it. It looks real to me.

no i don't mean radical changes just lots of colour changes and furniture

Yea.. they would blow thousands of pounds just to temporarily fool a bunch of internet users and Daily Star readers.

what'd be the point in that ?

but big brother is supposed to be SHARPER this year then they would!!

I think this would prove they are STUPIDER this year.

too fool us all, and give nothing away for this summer!!


it's like they're leavin a false trail.

EDIT: *leaving

Well I'd be extremely happy if the photos were fake. This is one of the worst houses yet! :sad:

Wasting money for the sake of a few decoration choices? It would have no impact and no speculation value.

They strategically do things like 8 beds and 8 chairs to try and fool us, not invite 60 Minute Makeover in and blow a few thousand to fool us.

why would they be 'STUPID' off them, with big brother you have to expect the unexpected.

PLUS: 'STUPIDER' IS NOT A WORD IT'S 'MORE STUPID THAN'

It's not stupid wasting thousands of pounds to fool about at the max 5000 people in the UK :whistle:

thank you Conor :wink:

According to the Oxford dictionary, stupider is a word

http://www.askoxford.com/results/?vi...archtype=exact

Why dont you get it, they would not gain anything from fooling 'some' people. If they actually wanted nobody to know what the house looks like then they would not have released the house pictures. That would be a simple solution to prevent wasting thousands of pounds.

HAHA thanks Tom.

but they would have had too before someone else did!! look at the aerial photos taken by the daily star.

Ariel pictures are different. How do you think somebody would get inside the house and take pictures?

well it's not a proper word: it's like jamp.

They usually put up camouflage nets. If they would have done that again there would have been no aerial pictures.

You can't argue with the Oxford dictionary. They are the people who decide what is a word and what isn't. It clearly has stupider listed under adjectives, therefore it is a word.

who builds houses? who designs them?

well now i feel 'stupider' than Cody but its still a stupid word: