Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
Joey he had no interest in keeping evidence or proof of what they were doing, he was as invested in keeping it a secret as MJ was, so why on earth would he keep them? He admits to being complicit in covering it up, but you don't believe it because he didn't keep evidence for a later date? Again it feels like you don't really understand what child grooming is, and that victims of it are not "hiding things away looking for a way out". They often want to protect the abuser and Wade Robson talks about this constantly throughout the entire 4 hour show. To say that you find it odd that he didn't keep evidence only shows that you weren't actually listening, or were unwilling to listen.
My honest advice would be to read up (properly, academically) on the psychology of child grooming. Not for the purposes of being convinced in this case, just because it's clear that you don't understand it or how it works and it's something that everyone should be aware of.
|
Goodness me.
I've read all there is to know on child grooming thank you.
Don't be so assuming I haven't.
I've dealt with those affected by child grooming too.
I was actually asked for what evidence could there have been.
I gave an instance.
So I answered that particular question.
You can hold to the view all you wish, he wanted to cover up all for Jackson.
I'll hold to my view he didn't, as I'm not convinced there was anything to cover up.