Quote:
Originally Posted by Swan
After watching quite a bit recently on Andrew Tate (since his new found fame) and having followed Jordan Peterson for a while now, i wouldn't lump them in the same category at all. Peterson does speak for struggling young men, but his approach is nothing like Tate's.
Tate plays a character, Joe Rogan put it quite well recently, he said Tate is like a wrestling bad guy/a heel. He plays up to it. I see Tate as someone who pretends he wants the best for young men (top G's, ugh) but really it's just about profit and making money. His Hustler University rubbish, is just a big con. Peterson on the other hand genuinely cares. Thing is with Peterson is his emotions always sit just below the surface. He can sometimes come across erratic. But he's passionate, and caring imo. Tate spouts hate, and it's all just a game to him. He's phoney, and a dick. Peterson is much more complex, his intentions are good though, imo anyway.
|
I don't really think they are the same but I think some of what JP says may encourage the Andrew tates of the world.
Just in regards to your comments about Joe Rogan calling him a wrestling baddie or whatever. I like Joe but I think it's very minimising of him to make a statement like that considering the things AT says, advising on how to traffic girls/women and now having been arrested for apparently doing that in Romania? Come on!