View Single Post
Old 05-09-2008, 11:06 PM #1
SiaSiaSia's Avatar
SiaSiaSia SiaSiaSia is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,847

Favourites:
The Apprentice 2013: Jason
X Factor 2009: John & Edward


SiaSiaSia SiaSiaSia is offline
Senior Member
SiaSiaSia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,847

Favourites:
The Apprentice 2013: Jason
X Factor 2009: John & Edward


Default Big Brother winners tend to be boring/offend the least amount of people.

Does anyone agree?
Every year we've had very boring winners: Anthony BB6 didn't really do much apart from be arrogant and quiet, Pete BB7 was alright & nice but still pretty quiet, and Brian, BB8. well. Oh and Cameron, BB4. And now Rachel, BB9.

My mum said usually the winners are the politically correct ones or the ones who don't offend anyone. (Also the whole sympathy vote thing / voting for some one "different" - i.e. Nadia was a transexual and Pete had tourettes)
Now i think that Nadia was a brilliant winner, as she had amazing personality. Pete was a good winner, and was at least fun, but I wonder what the outcome would have been without his tourettes.

Just wondering if anyone agreed, really?

[/rant]
SiaSiaSia is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote