View Single Post
Old 20-10-2010, 06:31 PM #22
Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by angus58 View Post
The incoming government was always going to take the heat for the "medicine" that is necessary to "cure" the economic sickness inherited by the incompetent, reckless and totally ammoral outgoing Labour government.

And Alan Johnson's (shadow chancellor) solution if Labour get back in power? Yes, you guessed it, to put up taxes and keep on borrowing - they just never learn do they? I hope to goodness Labour never get the chance to screw up the economy again.

The bottom line is that savage cuts are necessary, and unfortunately some are going to have to suffer more than others. It's deja vu all over again - every time Labour are kicked out of office, the new government has the unenviable task of cleaning up their mess.
The cuts do need to happen, I'm not refuting that for one second, but for example to lose 700-1000 police officers in the space of 3 years is quite alarming. The cuts should be a bit more gradual, that would inevitably mean even further cuts down the line but at least theres an adjustment period. Removing £83bn in one go is unnecessary, they should have tried for around £40-50bn.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck.pass View Post
So now we're talking about the physics involving a piece of frozen **** in a hot cup of tea. TiBB
Tom is offline