Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex
ok, then explain why she was convicted then???
i'm open to hearing your point of view. (bear in mind that she was later aquitted because there was no forensic evidence against her.... but i can't wait to hear your theory as to why she was convicted in the first place)
She has been proven innocent now, but i really wanna hear your theory as to why she was convicted first??
|
Well, as I said I haven't really been following the case. The only thing I read about it was this :
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...asons-why.html
and to me the 5 reasons why she is guilty seem more likely then the ones for why she is innocent.