Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick
Tom, Laura and Andrew - whilst dull; they did not win and were evicted. So there's no reason for us to hate them.
Rachel from BB11 was not dull, and she had a nice rack.
Louise was at least involved in a romance and was funny at times.
Harry was a legend who was involved in arguments and a great moment in BB12 - how on earth is he dull?
A Dullard should never win Big Brother, and Rachel did - and hopefully that won't happen again now that we have Vote to Save.
In Big Brother 9 - because it was the best series, every housemate was brilliant TV.
Out of all those 16 [or whatever amount] of housemates that could of won, who provided brilliant TV for that whole Summer - and Rachel won. Who did ****** all but sit down, look after Mikey and Kat, break up good arguments, cook rice and offer grapes to people.
That is why she is hated.
|
Paddy, what you fail to see, which does not surprise me is that if every winner was the same each year it would be just as boring. I like the fact that every year the winners have all been different types of people. We were due a nice, friendly, non OTT and rational winner and she may not have been the most entertaining, but to hate her for that is absolutely ridiculous. I wish you would listen to yourself sometimes, you come out with some stupid crap.