[Patrick]

Originally Posted by TheManWhoLaughs

I don't know how anyone could argue that she was duller than Tom and Louise (or Harry really. He just stood in the background and did the dishes except for his "hilarious" bananas prank). Let alone BB11's Rachel, Laura, Andrew etc.

Tom, Laura and Andrew - whilst dull; they did not win and were evicted. So there's no reason for us to hate them.
Rachel from BB11 was not dull, and she had a nice rack.
Louise was at least involved in a romance and was funny at times.
Harry was a legend who was involved in arguments and a great moment in BB12 - how on earth is he dull?

A Dullard should never win Big Brother, and Rachel did - and hopefully that won't happen again now that we have Vote to Save.

Originally Posted by Black Dagger

I know, I mean, okay, she wasn't even the best house-mate in BB9 but she wasn't this beyond awful winner that most paint her as.

I could name like 10 housemates who were more boring than her.

In Big Brother 9 - because it was the best series, every housemate was brilliant TV.
Out of all those 16 [or whatever amount] of housemates that could of won, who provided brilliant TV for that whole Summer - and Rachel won. Who did ****** all but sit down, look after Mikey and Kat, break up good arguments, cook rice and offer grapes to people.

That is why she is hated.