Quote:
Originally Posted by alex_front2
No, women are driven to attraction more by personality, charisma, success, money and power than a man's physique. They tried to do sex mags for women with hunky guys but the readership nearly always ends up being gay men. The male equivalent of Page 3 girls would never work for women. Women's taste are idiosyncratic whereas provided the females got a generic attractive face and big boobs men will fancy them. 90% of straight guys fancy Danica and Rhian. Generically pretty. Check. Slim waist. Check. Big boobs. Check. The personalities are irrelevant. Georgia Salpa was dull in the last series yet made it onto FHM's Sexiest Females top 10. I reckon only a handful of women fancy the Prince, Ashley, Harvey or the Situation. Women's taste are more diverse and harder to guess as personality and perceived power and money play a huge part.
Hence rich ugly men get women whilst good looking penniless guys may be single against will. Unattractive successful women also struggle as men go mainly for looks
|
Interesting, but I dont fully agree.
I agree women are attracted to money, power and success but not personality and charisma.
I dont think too many women would turn down a good looking man for the night in much the same way men wouldn't turn down a good looking woman.
I agree that money and power play a part. I have a friend who a millionaire. He a decent looking guy but no Brad Pitt. Its amazing how many women are suddenly interested in him when they see where he lives and what car he drives. This does not make women more discerning or more diverse in their taste. If anything it makes them more basic in what they want from a man. .