[alex_front2]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

I think women like to think they are more discerning than men and men are only ruled by basic instincts. Thus you get these fake surveys in fake mags like Cosmo saying 70% of women think personality is more important in a partner than looks where as with men its only 20%. Each one of those articles is utter bullsheeet. Women are just as shallow as men its just that men will admit it. Men are simply more honest when it comes to things like that.

No, women are driven to attraction more by personality, charisma, success, money and power than a man's physique. They tried to do sex mags for women with hunky guys but the readership nearly always ends up being gay men. The male equivalent of Page 3 girls would never work for women. Women's taste are idiosyncratic whereas provided the females got a generic attractive face and big boobs men will fancy them. 90% of straight guys fancy Danica and Rhian. Generically pretty. Check. Slim waist. Check. Big boobs. Check. The personalities are irrelevant. Georgia Salpa was dull in the last series yet made it onto FHM's Sexiest Females top 10. I reckon only a handful of women fancy the Prince, Ashley, Harvey or the Situation. Women's taste are more diverse and harder to guess as personality and perceived power and money play a huge part.

Hence rich ugly men get women whilst good looking penniless guys may be single against will. Unattractive successful women also struggle as men go mainly for looks